(a) 24.6 Nm
The torque produced by the net thrust about the center of the circle is given by:
where
F is the magnitude of the thrust
r is the radius of the wire
Here we have
F = 0.795 N
r = 30.9 m
Therefore, the torque produced is
(b)
The equivalent of Newton's second law for a rotational motion is
where
is the torque
I is the moment of inertia
is the angular acceleration
If we consider the airplane as a point mass with mass m = 0.741 kg, then its moment of inertia is
And so we can solve the previous equation to find the angular acceleration:
(c)
The linear acceleration (tangential acceleration) in a rotational motion is given by
where in this problem we have
is the angular acceleration
r = 30.9 m is the radius
Substituting the values, we find
The intensity of the electromagnetic wave which travels in an insulating magnetic material in a medium is 5.766×10⁻⁸ W/m².
The intensity of a wave is the total power delivered per unit area. It can be given as,
It can also be given as,
Here, () is relative permeability, () is physical constant, (k) is dielectric constant, (E) is the amplitude of electric field, and is the permittivity of free space.
Here, the electromagnetic wave with frequency 65.0hz travels in an insulating magnetic material that has dielectric constant 3.64 and relative permeability 5.18 at this frequency.
As the electric field has amplitude 7.20×10−3v/m. Thus, put the values in the above formula to find the intensity as,
Hence, the intensity of the electromagnetic wave which travels in an insulating magnetic material in a medium is 5.766×10⁻⁸ W/m².
Learn more about the intensity of the wave here;
b. What is the distance Δymax-min between the second maximum of laser 1 and the third minimum of laser 2, on the same side of the central maximum?
Answer:
a)Δy = 81.7mm
b)Δy = 32.7cm
Explanation:
To calculate the distance between any point of the interference pattern, simply use the trigonometric ratio of the tangent:
where D is the separation between the slits and the screen where the interference pattern is observed.
a) In this case:
Δy = |y1max (λ1) − y1max (λ2)|
Δy =
Δy =
Δy =
Δy =
Δy = 81.7mm
The separation between these maxima is 81.7 mm
b)
Δy = |y₂max (λ1) − y₂max (λ2)|
Δy =
Δy =
Δy = 32.7cm
The separation between the maximum interference of the 2nd order (2nd maximum) of the pattern produced by the laser 1 and the minimum of the 2nd order (3rd minimum) of the pattern produced by the laser 2 is 32.7 cm.
We can solve the problem using the concepts of waveinterference and the formulas for maxima and minima positions (i.e., y = L*m*λ/d and y = L*(m+1/2)*λ/d respectively). The difference between the first maxima of the two patterns is 4.9/60 m and the difference between the second maximum of laser 1 and the third minimum of laser 2 is also 4.9/60 m.
The problem described deals with wave interference and can be addressed using the formulas for path difference and phasedifference.
To answer part a, we need to find the difference between the positions of the first maxima for the two lasers. The position of any maxima in an interference pattern can be found using the formula: y = L * m * λ / d, where L is the distance from the slits to the screen, m is the order of the maxima, λ is the wavelength, and d is the slit separation.
So for the first laser (λ1=d/20) the position of the first maxima would be y1 = 4.9m * 1 * (d/20) / d =4.9/20 m.
And for the second laser (λ2 = d/15) the position of the first maxima would be y2= 4.9m * 1 * (d/15) / d =4.9/15 m.
Then, the distance Δ ymax-max between the first maxima of the two patterns is y2-y1= 4.9/15 m - 4.9/20 m = 4.9/60 m.
Answering part b involves finding the positions of the second maximum of laser 1 and the third minimum of laser 2. The position of any minimum in an interference pattern can be calculated using the formula: y = L * (m+1/2) * λ / d. For the second maximum of laser 1, we have y1max2 = 4.9 m * 2 * (d/20) / d = 4.9/10 m. For the third minimum of laser 2, we have y2min3 = 4.9m * (3.5) * (d/15)/d = 4.9*7/30 m. The difference Δymax-min is y2min3-y1max2= 4.9*7/30 m - 4.9/10 m = 4.9/60 m.
#SPJ12
Answer:
The speed must a ball be thrown vertically from ground level to rise to a maximum height is 28.35 m/s.
Explanation:
Given;
maximum vertical height of the throw, H = 41 m
Apply the following kinematic equation;
V² = U² + 2gH
where;
V is the final speed with which the ball will rise to a maximum height
U is the initial speed of the ball = 0
g is acceleration due to gravity = 0
V² = U² + 2gH
V² = 0² + 2gH
V² = 2gH
V = √2gH
V = √(2 x 9.8 x 41)
V = 28.35 m/s
Therefore, the speed must a ball be thrown vertically from ground level to rise to a maximum height is 28.35 m/s.
In order to solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to Newton's second law and the respective representation of the Forces in their vector components.
The horizontal component of this force is given as
F_x = Fcos(6.7)
While the vertical component of this force would be
F_y = Fsin(6.7)
In the vertical component, the sum of Force indicates that:
The Normal Force would therefore be equivalent to the weight and vertical component of the applied force, therefore:
In the horizontal component we have that the Force of tension in its horizontal component is equivalent to the Force of friction:
Using the previously found expression of the Normal Force and replacing it we have to,
Replacing,
Finally the acceleration would be by Newton's second law:
Therefore the greatest acceleration the man can give the airplane is
resistance not neglected) is 10 sec. The time of
descent of the mass from the same height will be
Answer:
10s
Explanation:
The time to get to the maximum would be the same as the time to get down to the maximum unless somehow gravity’s changes during the duration it goes up to and from maximum height.
I attached a Diagram for this problem.
We star considering the system is in equlibrium, so
Fm makes with vertical
Fm makes 70 with vertical
Applying summatory in X we have,
We know that W is equal to
Substituting,
For the second part we know that the reaction force Fj on deltoid Muscle is equal to Fm, We can assume also that