The dependent variable in this scenario is the outcome or result that you are trying to measure or analyze based on the student's skateboarding activity.
Since the student goes skateboarding a few times a week, the dependent variable could be any aspect related to their skateboarding experience or its effects.
Examples of possible dependent variables could include:
1. Improvement in skateboarding skills (e.g., measured by tricks learned, levels of proficiency).
2. Physical fitness (e.g., measured by changes in endurance, strength, or flexibility).
3. Time spent skateboarding per session.
4. The number of skateboarding injuries or accidents.
5. Overall enjoyment or satisfaction with skateboarding.
6. Changes in stress levels or mood before and after skateboarding sessions.
7. Social interactions and friendships formed through skateboarding.
The specific dependent variable would depend on the research question or hypothesis you are investigating in relation to the student's skateboarding activity.
Answer:
Statement 3 is correct.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle explains that the measurement of an observable quantity in the quantum domain inherently changes the value of that quantity
Explanation:
Classical mechanics is the study of motion of big, relatable bodies that we come in contact with in our day to day lives.
Quantum mechanics refers to this same study, but for particles on a subatomic level.
Obviously, Classical mechanics' theories and principles were first discovered and they worked for their intended uses (still work!). But when studies on particles on a sub-atomic level intensified, it became impractical to apply those theories and principles to these sub-atomic particles that displayed wave-particle duality nature properly.
Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle came in a time that explanations and justifications were needed to adapt these theories to sub-atomic particles.
The principle explains properly that it is impossible to measure the position and velocity (momentum) of a sub-atomic particle in exact terms and at the same time.
Mathematically, it is presented as
Δx.Δp ≥ ℏ
Where ℏ= adjusted Planck's constant.
ℏ= (h/2π)
And Δx and Δp are the uncertainties in measuring the position and momentum of sub-atomic particles.
The major reason for this is the wave-particle duality of sub-atomic particles. They exist as waves and particles at the same time that a complete knowledge of their position mean that a complete ignorance of their velocity and vice versa.
Taking the statements one at a time
Statement 1
Quantum Mechanics studies sub-atomic particles which are mostly always in motion. So, this is false.
Statement 2
It is impossible to calculate with accuracy both the position and momentum of particles in quantum mechanics not classical mechanics. As stated above, the reason for the uncertainty is the wave-particle duality of sub-atomic particles which the particle in classical mechanics do not exhibit obviously enough.
Statement 3
Any attempt to measure precisely the velocity of a subatomic particle, will knock it about in an unpredictable way, so that a simultaneous measurement of its position has no validity.
An essential feature of quantum mechanics is that it is generally impossible, even in principle, to measure a system without disturbing it. This is basically the uncertainty principle rephrased. This is the only true statement.
Hope this Helps!!!
Answer:
1.2 s
Explanation:
Given:
v₀ = 8.0 m/s
v = -4.0 m/s
a = -10 m/s²
Find: t
v = at + v₀
(-4.0 m/s) = (-10 m/s²) t + (8.0 m/s)
t = 1.2 s
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply to the concepts related to energy conservation. For this purpose we will consider potential energy and kinetic energy as the energies linked to the body. The final kinetic energy is null since everything is converted into potential energy, therefore
Potential Energy can be defined as,
Kinetic Energy can be defined as,
Now for Conservation of Energy,
Therefore the highets position the car reaches above the bottom of the hill is 40.02m
a. +5 με
b. +10 μC
c. +20 μC
d. +40 με
d
Explanation:
because they made contact that means their new force will be the same
Sphere Z is initially charged with +40 C. When it is touched to three other spheres, the charge is evenly distributed among them. The resulting charge on sphere Y is +10 μC.
The initial charge on sphere Z is +40 C. When sphere Z is touched to sphere W, the charge is evenly distributed between the two spheres, resulting in each sphere having a charge of +20 C. Then, when sphere Z is touched to sphere X, the total charge is evenly distributed between all three spheres, resulting in each sphere having a charge of +13.33 C. Finally, when sphere Z is touched to sphere Y, the total charge is evenly distributed between all four spheres, resulting in each sphere having a charge of +10 C. Therefore, the resulting charge on sphere Y is +10 μC (option b).
#SPJ3
b 2.5 m/s
c 10 m/s
d 5.2 m/s
Answer:
Explanation:
Step one:
given data
mass of ball m1=5kg
initial velocity of ball u1=10m/s
mass of pin m2=2kg
initial velocity of pin u2= 0m/s
final velocity of ball v2=8m/s
final velocity of pin v2=?
Step two:
The expression for elastic collision is given as
m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2
substituting we have
5*10+2*0=5*8+2*v2
50+0=40+2v2
50-40=2v2
10=2v2
divide both sides by 2
v2=10/2
v2=5m/s
The pin's final velocity is 5m/s
Answer:
the googles are 5.3 m from the edge
Explanation:
Given that
depth of pool , d = 3.2 m
Now, let i be the angle of incidence
a laser pointer 0.90 m above the edge of the pool and laser beam enters the water 2.2 m from the edge
⇒tan i = 2.2/0.9
solving we get
i = 67.8°
Using snell's law ,
n1 ×sin(i) = n2 ×sin(r)
n1= refractive index of 1st medium= 1
n2= refractive index of 2nd medium = 1.33
r= angle of reflection
therefore,
r = 44.1°
Now,
distance of googles = 2.2 + d×tan(r)
distance of googles = 2.2 + 3.2×tan(44.1)
distance of googles = 5.3 m
the googles are 5.3 m from the edge