Answer:
a. Della will lose because he did not sign a contract.
Explanation:
The UCC are a set of guidelines that is used for trade transactions to resolve disputes and ensure equity between the buyer and seller.
There are various criteria used to qualify a valid transaction. One of them is that for a non movable asset, it's sale must be under a written contract.
A verbal contract will not suffice and is not binding.
In this scenario where Joe verbally contracts with Delia to sell his farm to Delia, they did not sign a contract and makes a down payment. But Joe decides after several months to sell his farm to Eli.
Since there is no written contract if Delia objects to the second sale she will lose
Answer:
The correct answer is $1,370
Explanation:
The computation of net present value is shown below:-
For computing the net present value first we need to find out the present value of inflow
Present Value of Inflow of 3 Years at 9% = Net cash flow × Number of years
= $27,800 × 2.5313
= $70,370
Net Present Value = Present value of inflow - Initial Outflow
= $70,370 - $69,000
= $1,370
Therefore for computing the net present value we simply deduct the initial outflow from present value of inflow.
Determine the new selling price to break even next round.
Answer:
$18.80
Explanation:
New selling price = Old selling price - Adjustments
Old selling price = $19.00, Adjustments = 1 quarter of reduced raw material costs difference
New selling price = $19.00 - ($8.13 - $7.33)/4
New selling price = $19.00 - $0.20
New selling price = $18.80
So, the new selling price to break even next round is $18.80.
Answer:
The correct answer is: comparative advantage.
Explanation:
In Business, comparative advantage is an advantage that a company has over its competitors. The strategy relies on the company being able to produce at a lower comparative cost. This is achieved by lowering production costs or by introducing more efficient manufacturing strategies.
In Canada's case, the reopening of Voisey's Bay mine implies an opportunity to lower the costs of the commercialization of nickel since there will be more of that resource available for extraction.
Canada, being a significant nickel producer with the reopening of Voisey's Bay mine, is said to have a comparative advantage. This term refers to a country's ability to produce goods at lower opportunity costs compared to others, which allows Canada to efficiently produce and export nickel.
Canada's position as the world's second-largest producer of nickel, paired with the reopening of the Voisey's Bay mine, equips Canada with what is known as a comparative advantage in the global nickel market. A comparative advantage refers to a country's ability to produce a certain good or service at lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. In this case, due to the vast resources of nickel-bearing ore at Voisey's Bay, Canada has a cost advantage, which enables Canada to produce and export nickel more efficiently than other countries.
#SPJ3
Answer:
a. The statement is false because a policy motivated by good intentions may have unintended negative consequences.
d. The statement is false because sound economic reasoning is required to anticipate unintended consequences of policies that are motivated by good intentions.
Explanation:
It is important to have good intentions when creating policies but a sound policy requires more than just good intentions.
To create a sound policy, sound economic principles and reasoning must be employed. This is important to predict and tackle unintended negative consequences that may arise, irrespective of how good the intentions were in creating the policies.
Merely having good intentions does not guarantee sound policy, particularly in economics. Sound economic reasoning is needed to anticipate possible consequences. Thus, the claim that good intentions lead to sound policy in economics is not entirely accurate.
The statement 'The economic way of thinking stresses that good intentions lead to sound policy' is not entirely valid. Merely having good intentions is not enough to ensure a sound policy, especially in an economic context. Economic reasoning is needed to ascertain the possible implications, both positive and negative, of a policy. As such, the elements a. and d. of the given options are correct:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Total= $34,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
West Units produced and sold 31,000 units
Selling price per unit $ 6
Variable costs per unit 2
Direct fixed cost 49,000
Common fixed cost 41,000
Segment margin:
Sales= 186,000
Variable costs= 62,000
Direct fixed costs= 49000
Common fixed costs= 41000
Total= $34,000
Answer:
1. $67,500
2. $69,500
3. $69,500
Explanation:
1. The computation of bad debt expense is shown below:-
Bad debt expense = Credit sales × Debt percentage
= $4,500,000 × 1.5%
= $67,500
2. The computation of receivable written off is shown below:-
receivable written off = Allowance Beginning balance + bad debt expense - Allowance ending balance
= $42,000 + $67,500 - $40,000
= $69,500
3. The computation of bad debt expense be for 2013 is shown below:-
= receivable written off
= $69,500