Answer:
b. rises.
Explanation:
In the case when the future income increased on permanently basis so as per the life cycle and the hypothesis of permanent income the current income rises because in this case the people rises their level of consumption patterns over their lifecycle
Therefore in the given situation, the rises is the answer and the same is to be considered
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
1.
Selling Price = Sales ÷ Units Sold
Current Selling Price = $385,000 ÷ 5500
= $70
Now
Expected Selling Price per unit = $70 + ($70× 10%)
= $77
Now
Expected Sales = 5500 × $77
= $423,500
Now
Net Income = Sales - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost
= $423,500 - $250,000 - $94,000
2.
Sales = $385000
Variable cost = $385,000 × 56% = $215,600
Sales $385,000
Less: variable cost -$215,600
Contribution Margin $169,400
Les: fixed cost -$94,000
Net Income $75,400
As we can see that if there is an increase in Selling Price by 10% so it would produce highest Net Income.
Comparing two scenarios for Carla Vista Company: one of increasing the selling price by 10%, and the other of reducing the variable costs to 56% of sales, the former scenario of increasing the selling price provides a higher net income and is the better strategy.
The question asks us to calculate the net income under two different scenarios for Carla Vista Company, and then determine which option produces the higher net income.
To do this, we first need to understand the company's current situation.
Its current net income is calculated as follows: Sales ($385,000) - Variable Costs ($250,000) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $41,000.
Under the first alternative, management plans to increase the selling price by 10% without any changes in total variable costs or units sold.
So the new sales figure will be $385,000 + 10% of $385,000 = $423,500.
The net income then becomes: New Sales ($423,500) - Variable Costs ($250,000) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $79,500.
Under the second alternative, management plans to reduce variable costs to 56% of sales.
So, the new variable costs will be 56% of $385,000 = $215,600.
The net income then becomes: Sales ($385,000) - New Variable Costs ($215,600) - Fixed Costs ($94,000) = $75,400.
Comparing the two alternatives, we see that the first alternative, increasing the selling price by 10%, gives a higher net income and should thus be the advisable course of action.
Learn more about Net Income here:
#SPJ3
B. The present value (PV) of the amount deposited
C. The duration of the deposit (N)
D. The trend between the present and future values of an investment
Answer:
D. The trend between the present and future values of an investment
Explanation:
The future value of an investment formula is:
FV = PV (1 + i)^n
Where:
We can determine that the trend between the present and future values of an investment is not needed to find the future value of an investment, because such trend is not part of the future value of an investment formula, while all the other variables are part of it.
How much money will the owners invest in the business start-up?
How will the salespeople for this business be compensated?
What are the unique features of this business’s merchandise?
Answer:
Hence,
The money which the owners invest in the business start-up is by Financial statements.
The salespeople for this business be compensated is by Marketing & sales management.
The unique features of this business’s merchandise are by Service or product line.
Explanation:
Financial statements show how much money will the owners invest in the business start-up.
Marketing & sales management shows how will the salespeople for this business be compensated.
Service or product line shows What are the unique features of this business’s merchandise
In a business plan, the 'Financial Statements' section provides information about the owner's start-up investment, compensation of salespeople is detailed in the 'Marketing & Sales Management' section, and unique merchandise features could be found in the 'Service or Product Line' section.
In a business plan, you would typically find the answers to your questions in the following sections:
Learn more about Business Plan here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
POAR= 170% of the direct material cost.
Explanation:
Explanation:
The predetermined overhead absorption rate (POAR: The overhead absorption is a rate which is used to charge overheads to production units. Note that this rate is computed using estimated figures
The rate is computed as follows:
Predetermined overhead absorption rate
POAR
= (Budgeted overhead for the period/Budgeted direct material cost)× 100
= $680,000/400,00 × 100
= 170% of the direct material cost.
Hey There!:
Sample Mean = 4.4823
SD = 0.1859
Sample Size (n) = 7
Standard Error (SE) = SD/root(n) = 0.0703
alpha (a) = 1-0.99 = 0.01
t(a/2, n-1 ) = 3.7074
Margin of Error (ME) = t(a/2,n-1)x SE = 0.2606
99% confidence interval is given by:
Sample Mean +/- (Margin of Error)
4.4823 +/- 0.2606 = (4.222 , 4.743)
Hope this helps!