Answer:sorry I don't think itis possible with elimination method if it is possible you can post it in the comment section
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Estimate the maximum volume for this box?
b. What cutout length produces the maximum volume?
To answer this question it is necessary to find the volume of the box as a function of "x", and apply the concepts of a maximum of a function.
The solution is:
a) V (max) = 36.6 in³
b) x = 1.3 in
The volume of a cube is:
V(c) = w×L×h ( in³)
In this case, cutting the length "x" from each side, means:
wide of the box ( w - 2×x ) equal to ( 7 - 2×x )
Length of the box ( L - 2×x ) equal to ( 9 - 2×x )
The height is x
Then the volume of the box, as a function of x is:
V(x) = ( 7 - 2×x ) × ( 9 -2×x ) × x
V(x) = ( 63 - 14×x - 18×x + 4×x²)×x
V(x) = 4×x³ - 32×x² + 63×x
Tacking derivatives, on both sides of the equation
V´(x) = 12×x² - 64 ×x + 63
If V´(x) = 0 then 12×x² - 64 ×x + 63 = 0
This expression is a second-degree equation, solving for x
x₁,₂ = [ 64 ± √ (64)² - 4×12*63
x₁ = ( 64 + 32.74 )/ 24
x₁ = 4.03 this value will bring us an unfeasible solution, since it is not possible to cut 2×4 in from a piece of paper of 7 in ( therefore we dismiss that value)
x₂ = ( 64 - 32.74)/24
x₂ = 1.30 in
The maximum volume of the box is:
V(max) = ( 7 - 2.60) × ( 9 - 2.60)×1.3
V(max) = 4.4 × 6.4 × 1.3
V(max) = 36.60 in³
To chek for maximum value of V when x = 1.3
we find the second derivative of V V´´, and substitute the value of x = 1.3, if the relation is smaller than 0, we have a maximum value of V
V´´(x) = 24×x - 64 for x = 1.3
V´´(x) = 24× 1.3 - 64 ⇒ V´´(x) < 0
Then the value x = 1.3 will bring maximum value for V
Related Link: brainly.com/question/13581879
The maximum volume of the box that can be formed is approximately 17.1875 cubic inches. The cutout length that would result in this maximum volume is approximately 1.25 inches.
To solve this problem, we will use optimization in calculus. Let's denote the length of the square cutout as 'x'. When you cut out an x by x square from each corner and fold up the sides, the box will have dimensions:
So the volume V of the box can be given by the equation: V = x(9-2x)(7-2x). We want to maximize this volume.
To find the maximum, differentiate V with respect to x, equate to zero and solve for x. V' = (9-2x)(7-2x) + x(-2)(7-2x) + x(9-2x)(-2) = 0. We obtain x=1.25 inches, but we need to verify whether this value gives us a maximum. Second differentiation, V'' = -12 is less than zero for these dimensions so the V is maximum.
a. So, when we solve, the maximum volume will be approximately 17.1875 cubic inches.
b. The cutout length that would produce the maximum volume is therefore about 1.25 inches.
#SPJ12
Answer:
true
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
true?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
111°
Step-by-step explanation:
By exterior angle theorem:
Answer:
x = 111
Step-by-step explanation:
180- 82 -29 is 69 and 180-69 is x which x is equal to 111
Answer:x = negative 4
Step-by-step explanation:
The given equation is expressed as
1/4 × x - 1/8 = 7/8 + 1/2 × x
x/4 - 1/8 = 7/8 + x/2
First step is to find the lowest common multiple of the left hand side of the equation and the right hand side of the equation. Then, we would multiply both sides of the equation by the lowest common multiple. The lowest common multiple is 8. Therefore
x/4 × 8 - 1/8 × 8 = 7/8 × 8 + x/2 × 8
2x - 1 = 7 + 4x
7 + 4x = 2x - 1
Subtracting 2x and 7 from the left hand side of the equation and the right hand side of the equation, it becomes
7 - 7 + 4x - 2x = 2x - 2x - 1 - 7
2x = - 8
x = - 8/2 = - 4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-4
a. Let be the CDF of . The CDF of is
which is to say, is also normally distributed, but with different parameters. In particular,
b. Using the appropriate CDFs, we have
c. The 99th percentile for any distribution is the value of such that , i.e. all values of below make up the lower 99% of the distribution.
We have
d. On the other hand, the 99th percentile for is
e. We have
which suggests that is normally distributed, or is log-normally distributed. Recall that the moment-generating function for is
But we also have
Then
and