Answer:
0.25( m1m1) , 0.75( m2m2)
Explanation:
Noted the formula for kinetic energy is 1/2(Mass × Velocity).
Therefore the original value of the mass is 0.5, giving half away makes it 0.25 to another mass which is primarily 0.5. This now makes the new mass 0.25+0.5=0.75.
Thank you.
Complete Question
An electron is accelerated by a 5.9 kV potential difference. das (sd38882) – Homework #9 – yu – (44120) 3 The charge on an electron is 1.60218 × 10−19 C and its mass is 9.10939 × 10−31 kg. How strong a magnetic field must be experienced by the electron if its path is a circle of radius 5.4 cm?
Answer:
The magnetic field strength is
Explanation:
The work done by the potential difference on the electron is related to the kinetic energy of the electron by this mathematical expression
Making v the subject
Where m is the mass of electron
v is the velocity of electron
q charge on electron
is the potential difference
Substituting values
f
For the electron to move in a circular path the magnetic force[] must be equal to the centripetal force[] and this is mathematically represented as
making B the subject
r is the radius with a value = 5.4cm =
Substituting values
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A P E X
A. 4N
C. 16N
B. 8N
D. 32 N
The force being exerted on the 16-kg cart is 32N.
The force being exerted on the 16-kg cart can be determined using Newton's second law of motion, which states that force is equal to mass multiplied by acceleration. In the given graph, the cart is accelerating at a rate of 2 m/s2. Therefore, the force can be calculated as:
force = mass x acceleration
force = 16 kg x 2 m/s2 = 32 N
The 16-kg cart experiences a force of 32N, determined by applying Newton's second law of motion. According to this law, force equals mass multiplied by acceleration. In this scenario, the cart accelerates at a rate of 2 m/s². Substituting the values into the equation, the force exerted on the cart can be calculated as 16 kg multiplied by 2 m/s², resulting in a force of 32 N. This fundamental principle in physics establishes a quantitative relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.
#SPJ11
Answer:
D
Explanation:
T =1/f = 1/4.31s = 0.232hz correct?
Answer:correct
Explanation: Period T is the reciprocal of frequency (i.e T=1/f)
Frequency is the reciprocal of period (i.e F= 1/T)
Therefore if T=4.31s
Frequency F= 1/4.31s=0.232hz
(a) 9.8 m/s^2, downward
There is only one force acting on the ball while it is in flight: the force of gravity, which is
F = mg
where
m is the mass of the ball
g is the gravitational acceleration
According to Newton's second law, the force acting on the ball is equal to the product between the mass of the ball and its acceleration, so
F = mg = ma
which means
a = g
So, the acceleration of the ball during the whole flight is equal to the acceleration of gravity:
g = -9.8 m/s^2
where the negative sign means the direction is downward.
(b) v = 0
Any object thrown upward reaches its maximum height when its velocity is zero:
v = 0
In fact, at that moment, the object's velocity is turning from upward to downward: that means that at that instant, the velocity must be zero.
(c) 8.72 m/s, upward
The initial velocity of the ball can be found by using the equation:
v = u + at
Where
v = 0 is the velocity at the maximum height
u is the initial velocity
a = g = -9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration
t is the time at which the ball reaches the maximum height: this is half of the time it takes for the ball to reach again the starting point of the motion, so
So we can now solve the equation for u, and we find:
(d) 3.88 m
The maximum height reached by the ball can be found by using the equation:
where
v = 0 is the velocity at the maximum height
u = 8.72 m/s is the initial velocity
a = g = -9.8 m/s^2 is the gravitational acceleration
d is the maximum height reached
Solving the equation for d, we find
Answer:
Statement 3 is correct.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle explains that the measurement of an observable quantity in the quantum domain inherently changes the value of that quantity
Explanation:
Classical mechanics is the study of motion of big, relatable bodies that we come in contact with in our day to day lives.
Quantum mechanics refers to this same study, but for particles on a subatomic level.
Obviously, Classical mechanics' theories and principles were first discovered and they worked for their intended uses (still work!). But when studies on particles on a sub-atomic level intensified, it became impractical to apply those theories and principles to these sub-atomic particles that displayed wave-particle duality nature properly.
Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle came in a time that explanations and justifications were needed to adapt these theories to sub-atomic particles.
The principle explains properly that it is impossible to measure the position and velocity (momentum) of a sub-atomic particle in exact terms and at the same time.
Mathematically, it is presented as
Δx.Δp ≥ ℏ
Where ℏ= adjusted Planck's constant.
ℏ= (h/2π)
And Δx and Δp are the uncertainties in measuring the position and momentum of sub-atomic particles.
The major reason for this is the wave-particle duality of sub-atomic particles. They exist as waves and particles at the same time that a complete knowledge of their position mean that a complete ignorance of their velocity and vice versa.
Taking the statements one at a time
Statement 1
Quantum Mechanics studies sub-atomic particles which are mostly always in motion. So, this is false.
Statement 2
It is impossible to calculate with accuracy both the position and momentum of particles in quantum mechanics not classical mechanics. As stated above, the reason for the uncertainty is the wave-particle duality of sub-atomic particles which the particle in classical mechanics do not exhibit obviously enough.
Statement 3
Any attempt to measure precisely the velocity of a subatomic particle, will knock it about in an unpredictable way, so that a simultaneous measurement of its position has no validity.
An essential feature of quantum mechanics is that it is generally impossible, even in principle, to measure a system without disturbing it. This is basically the uncertainty principle rephrased. This is the only true statement.
Hope this Helps!!!