Answer:
The answer is True
Explanation:
Suppose that Spain and Germany consider trading shoes and jeans with each other. Spain can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than ------ of jeans for each pair of shoes it exports to Germany. Similarly, Germany can gain from trade as long as it receives more than--------- of shoes for each pair of jeans it exports to Spain.
Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of jeans) would allow both Germany and Spain to gain from trade?
4 pairs of jeans per pair of shoes, 1 pair of jeans per pair of shoes, 6 pairs of jeans per pair of shoes, 2 pairs of jeans per pair of shoes
Answer:
By comparing the opportunity cost of producing shoes in the two countries, you can tell that SPAIN has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes and GERMANY has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans.
Suppose that Spain and Germany consider trading shoes and jeans with each other. Spain can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than 3 PAIRS of jeans for each pair of shoes it exports to Germany. Similarly, Germany can gain from trade as long as it receives more than ¹/₁₁ PAIR of shoes for each pair of jeans it exports to Spain.
Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of jeans) would allow both Germany and Spain to gain from trade?
Explanation:
Opportunity costs refer to the extra costs or benefits lost resulting from choosing one investment or activity over another alternative. In this case, if Spain specializes in the production of shoes, it will not produce jeans anymore. The opposite would happen to Germany.
Answer:
$66,000
Explanation:
The computation of the total implicit cost per year is shown below:
= Given up salary + investment amount × interest rate on investment in the economy
= $60,000 + $100,000 × 6%
= $60,000 + $6,000
= $66,000
We simply added the given up salary and investment amount after considering the interest rate on investment so that the accurate amount could come
Net operating income $6,200,000
Average operating assets $36,000,000
Required:
a. Compute the margin for Alyeska Services Company.
b. Compute the turnover for Alyeska Services Company.
c. Compute the return on investment (ROI) for Alyeska Services Company.
Answer:
a. The margin for Alyeska Services Company: 35.23%
b. The turnover for Alyeska Services Company: 0.49
c. The return on investment (ROI) for Alyeska Services Company: 17.22%
Explanation:
a. The profit margin reflects a company's overall ability to turn income into profit, is calculated by formula:
Profit margin = (Net operating income/Net sales) x 100% = $6,200,000/$17,600,000 x 100% = 35.23%
b. Asset turnover helps investors understand how effectively companies are using their assets to generate sales. Asset turnover is calculated by using following formula:
Asset Turnover = Total Sales/ Average Total Assets = $17,600,000/$36,000,000 = 0.49
c. Return on investment (ROI) is calculated by using following formula:
ROI = Net income/Total investment x 100%
In Alyeska Services Company,
ROI = Net operating income/Average operating assets x 100% = $6,200,000/$36,000,000 x 100% = 17.22%
Accounts Payable $4,440 Salaries and Wages Expense $24,420
Cash 13,320 Notes Payable 37,000
Advertising Expense 8,880 Rent Expense 14,504
Service Revenue 79,920 Accounts Receivable 19,980
Equipment 42,920 Dividends 11,100
Answer: $76,220
Explanation:
Total Assets = Current Assets + Fixed Assets
Current Assets = Cash + Accounts Receivable
= 13,320 + 19,980
= $33,300
Fixed Assets = Equipment = $42,920
Total Assets = 33,300 + 42,920
= $76,220
Answer:
The answer is C. Some firms exiting the market
Explanation:
When there is a sudden fall in the market demand in a competitive industry(e.g perfect competition) some firms would making economic losses and it is best if they shut down operation and production. Once these happen, they exit the market.
Option A is incorrect . Same as option B.
Option D is also incorrect
A sudden fall in market demand in a competitive industry can lead to a short-run market equilibrium price lower than the original equilibrium, some firms exiting the market, and a market equilibrium price higher than the short-run price.
In a competitive industry, a sudden fall in market demand can have several effects. The correct answer is (d) All of the above. When market demand falls, it creates excess supply in the market, leading to a decrease in the market equilibrium price. This means that option (a) is correct. The lower price in the short run may cause some firms to exit the market due to lower profitability, which confirms option (c). Lastly, in the long run, if demand remains low, the market equilibrium price may eventually be higher than the short-run price as the supply adjusts to the lower demand, validating option (b).
#SPJ3
Answer:
True
Explanation:
As for the provided information, the flu is new in market and has serious issues involved, and now since no remedy or cure is possible and will not be possible even in near future,
The hand sanitizer will help as a preventive action from getting infected to the Flu. Thus, people will buy the sanitizer at huge level.
Thereby, the demand for such product will increase in market in huge, and accordingly even if the company has to increase production capacity through lease it shall do so.
As with huge turnover break even will be realized and there will be profits.