Answer:
The undervaluation penalty is $560
Explanation:
Solution
Under valuation penalty applied when a person valued assets understated to save tax.
The undervaluation reduces the tax and hence comes with accuracy related penalty.
From the example, Tim undervalued the gift of $7,000 which is valued at $15,000 by IRS.
The deduction is undervalued for more than 150% and hence penalty is assessed. this is so because the income tax valuation is lower than 40%, so the penalty rate is 20%
Thus,
The calculation of overvaluation penalty is given below:
Undervaluation = $8000
Tax rate = 35%
Tax amount = $2,800
Penalty rate = 20%
Penalty on undervaluation is =$560
Therefore, the undervaluation penalty is $560
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
b. If the T-bill rate were 6% and the market return during the period were 14%, which adviser would be the superior stock selector?
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
c. What if the T-bill rate were 3% and the market return 15%?
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
Answer:
a. Cannot be determined
b. Second Investment Advisor
c. Second Investment Advisor
Explanation:
a. Since all the information is not given in the question so we are not able to give advise. As abnormal return is calculated from subtracting the expected return from the return. But no such information is provided in the question.
b. We know that
Abnormal return = Return - expected return
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
In case of First Investment Advisor:
The return is 19%
And, the expected return equal to
= 6% + 1.5 × (14% - 6%)
= 6% + 1.5 × 8%
= 6% + 12%
= 18%
So abnormal return = 19% - 18% = 1%
In case of Second Investment Advisor:
The return is 16%
And, the expected return equal to
= 6% + 1 × (14% - 6%)
= 6% + 1 × 8%
= 6% + 8%
= 14%
So abnormal return = 16% - 18% = 2%
So, Second Investment Advisor should be accepted as it has high abnormal return then first investment Advisor
c. In case of First Investment Advisor:
The return is 19%
And, the expected return equal to
= 3% + 1.5 × (15% - 3%)
= 3% + 1.5 × 12%
= 3% + 18%
= 21%
So abnormal return = 19% - 21% = -2%
In case of Second Investment Advisor:
The return is 16%
And, the expected return equal to
= 3% + 1 × (15% - 3%)
= 3% + 1 × 12%
= 3% + 12%
= 15%
So abnormal return = 16% - 15% = 1%
So, Second Investment Advisor should be accepted as it has high abnormal return then first investment Advisor
Answer:
A). A real estate development company wants to estimate the probable sales of construction services on the basis of marriage rates, population movement in the region, and interest rates on construction loans.
Explanation:
Multiple regression is elucidated as the statistical technique employed to determine the association between two or more dependent or response and independent/explanatory variables.
As per the question, the multiple regression can be employed in the first situation where 'a real estate company wishes to forecast the probable sales of construction on the basis of....loans.' Multiple regression analysis would help in representing the linear relationship between these two variables that helps in ensuring effective analysis and making predictions and ensuring optimum output. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
Direct material= $340
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct labor $540
Beginning work in process inventory $330
Ending work in process inventory $420
Cost of goods manufactured $1620
Manufacturing overhead $830
To calculate the direct material used in production, we need to use the following formula:
cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
1,620= 330 + DM + 540 + 830 - 420
Direct material= $340
Answer:
The Correct Option is "Economies of scale"
Explanation:
Economies of scale:
Economies of scale explain the reduction in per unit production costs caused by expansion of production. If a economy doubles its output each year causes the production costs to reduce by 30 percent, then it is an example of economies of scale.
Answer: Economies of scale.
Explanation:
Economies of scale is the saving in costs that is gained as a result of an increase in production level. It is the cost advantage that an organization experiences due to its increase in the level of output. The benefit occurs as a result of the inverse relationship that exists between quantity produced and per-unit fixed cost. The higher the quantity of output that is produced, the smaller the per unit fixed cost.
Economies of scale also brings about a reduction in the average variable costs when output increases. This is due to operational efficiencies which occurs as the scale of production increases. When the output is doubled, the reduction in costs by thirty percent is an example of economies of scale.
Check all that apply.
An asset account increases. An asset account decreases.
A liability account increases. A liability account decreases.
Capital Stock increases. Capital Stock decreases.
Retained Earnings increase. Retained Earnings decrease.
Answer:
Asset Account is decreased.
Liability Account is also decreased.
No effects on Capital Stock.
No effects on Retained Earnings.
Explanation:
Asset Account is decreased by $5000 because Cash is paid for the purchases made on account last month.
Liability Account is decreased by $5000 because accounts payable for the purchases made In the last month is now paid.
This transaction will have no effects on Capital Stock Account and Retained Earnings Account.
Revenue Expenses
(A) $18,600,000 $18,750,000
(B) $4,650,000 $ 4,687,500
(C) $4,650,000 $ 5,250,000
(D) $4,687,500 $ 4,687,500
Answer:
(C) $4,650,000 $ 5,250,000
Explanation:
total contract price is $ 18,600,000
season construction using percentage of completion method.
Amount of revenue & construction expense for the year ended december 31, 2020 will be
25% of $ 18,600,000 revenue = $ 4,650,000
25% of $ 18,750,000 total cost = $5,250,000