Answer:
Market value of common stock (6,000,000 x $27) =$162,000,000
Market value of preferred stock (1,000,000 X $15) = $15,000,000
Market value of debt (10,000 x $1,190) = $11,900,000
Market value of the company $188,900,000
Weight of debt in the capital structure
= $11,900,000/$188,900,000 x 100
= 6.299% = 6.30%
Explanation:
In this case, there is need to calculate the market value of the company, which is the aggregate of market value of common stock, market value of preferred stock and market value of debt. The market value of each stock is obtained by multiplying the number of units outstanding by the current market price per stock. The weight of debt is determined by dividing the market value of debt by the market value of the company.
Answer:
Fixed Cost = $24,000 Variable cost = $5
Explanation:
You have to use the High-Low method
From the table you got, you pick the higher and the lowest unit sold
and calculate the diference between them:
Now 14,400 Units generates a cost of 72,000 Dividing we get the variable component
Then we calculate for the fixed cost:
Fixed Cost = 24,000
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry for July 8, 2016 is shown below:
Bank A/c Dr $11,700
Commission fee A/c $300 ($12,000 × 2.5%)
To Sales A/c $12,000
Since the sales is recorded at $12,000 which includes commission fee of $300 ($12,000 × 2.5%) , the remaining balance i.e $11,700 ($12,000 - $300) would be debited to the bank account.
b. What percentage of employers in the service industry use succession planning?
c. What skills, education, and training have been provided to potential candidates?
d. What is the designated procedure for assessing and selecting potential candidates?
All of the following questions are relevant to Mari's decision to fill top positions at the new hotels with internal candidates except What percentage of employers in the service industry use succession planning? Therefore, the correct answer is Option B.
The percentage of employers in the service industry using succession planning is not directly relevant to Maria's decision to fill top positions at the new hotels with internal candidates. Succession planning is a different concept from internal promotions.
Succession planning typically involves identifying and developing potential candidates for higher-level positions within the organization to ensure a smooth transition when key employees retire, leave, or are promoted to other roles. While it can be beneficial for an organization, it is not directly related to the decision of filling top positions at the new hotels with internal candidates.
The other three questions What are the key managerial positions that are available at the new hotels? , What skills, education, and training have been provided to potential candidates? , and What is the designated procedure for assessing and selecting potential candidates? are more prominent to make that decision.
To know more about service industry:
#SPJ3
Answer:
b. What percentage of employers in the service industry use succession planning
Explanation:
GOT IT RIGHT ON TEST 2020
Manufacturing overhead costs $320,000 $400,000
Direct labor hours 65,000 DLH 75,000 DLH
Machine hours 2,000 MH 2,500 MH
Required:
a. What is the company's plantwide overhead rate if machine hours are the allocation base? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Answer:
$160.00 per machine hour
Explanation:
The plant-wide (blanket ) overhead absorption rate is calculated as follows:
Plant-wide OAR=
Total overheads of all the production departments/ Total machine hours
Plant-wide OAR = $(320,000 + 400,000)/(2,000+2,500) machine hours
=$160.00 per machine hour
FIFO LIFO
Year 1 $195,000 $177,500
Year 2 $390,000 $355,000
Ignoring income tax considerations, prepare the appropriate journal entry, dated January 1, Year 3, to report this accounting change. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field.)
Answer:
Explanation: times all the number together
Answer:
135,000 transferred out under Weighted average method
Explanation:
W/A method:
equivalent units materials 10,000 + 2,000 = 12,000 units at 100%
material cost: 690,000 + 30,000 = 720,000
720,000 / 12,000 = 60
equivalent units conversion 10,000 + 500 = 10,500
conversion cost 22,500 + 765,000 = 787,500
787,500 / 10,500 = 75
75 + 60 = 135 cost per unit
10,000 x 135 = 135,000 transferred out