Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South. For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
The Great Compromise proposed a bicameral congress to achieve political balance between small and large states, and the Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of enslaved persons for federal representation and taxation, giving extra political power to slave states. Both compromises significantly shaped the U.S. political landscape.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise had significant political implications for the formation and structure of the United States government. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, proposed a bicameral congress. It assuaged the fears of both small and large states by allowing for variable representation: equal representation for each state in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on state population.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's representation in the House of Representatives and its federal tax bill. This compromise effectively gave extra political power to slave states and had a profound impact on the political balance between the North and South. However, it also entrenched racial prejudice in the Constitution by implying that enslaved people were less than fully human.
Both compromises played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. political landscape. They determined how states were represented in the federal government and managed contentious issues like slavery, ensuring the preservation of the Union.
#SPJ3
Select all that apply.
Answer: B & C
Explanation:
of the options:
a.) founder of the Special Olympics
b.) sister of John F. Kennedy and Eunice Kennedy Shriver
c.) person with a disability
d.) advocate for the rights of people with disabilities
Answer:
We cannot answer without you telling us the options.
Explanation:
Without the options we cannot give you a straight answer to your question. I recommend you re-post the question with the options as well.
The correct option is "The Netherlands"
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Holland was the cradle of commercial capitalism and modern science, and was the homeland of Grotius, Spinoza, Vermeer, Rembrandt, Huygens and Sawammerdam, among many other geniuses who lived in Amsterdam, Utrecht or Leiden, as in the case of Descartes or Hobbes. In that period, Holland was considered the land of nonconformity par excellence and freedom of thought. And it was also the place where the first "national economic miracle" of the history of capitalism took place.
False
Which European explorer attempted to circumnavigate the world, leaving from Spain in 1519, but was killed in the midst of his journey, leaving his crew members to complete his goal?
Christopher Columbus
Ferdinand Magellan
Henry Hudson
Vasco da Gama
Answer:
True
Ferdinand Magellan
Explanation:
This statement is true as it describes many of the reasons why Europeans were willing to explore the unknown. The first settlers in America were driven by a desire to improve their economic prospects, a desire to practice their religion freely or a desire to bring glory to their nation.
Ferdinand Magellan was a Portuguese explorer who organized the Spanish expedition that resulted in the first circumnavigation of the Earth, from 1519 to 1522. Magellan was unable to complete this journey, as he was killed in the Philippines in 1521.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
upper class where scared to compermise the respect and rights they had
Answer:
true
Explanation: