The answer is D. forcing West Berlin to become a part of East Germany. When the Russians built the Berlin Wall, people in the East were desperate to leave to leave and go to the West. The West was also disappointed with Kennedy because the Wall was not only hard to cross but Communists now threatened them. Kennedy reaffirmed his support by Sending Vice President Lyndon Johnson and U.S. troops to reaffirm his commitment to the West.
B. Britain
C. Germany
D. Italy
Answer:
Some northern states challenged it in the Supreme Court
Explanation:
Answer:
The Act that was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because of the wording of the Fourteenth Amendment was the Civil Rights Act of 1875.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was a federal law proposed by Republican Senator Charles Sumner and Republican representative Benjamin Butler in 1870 during the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant. The law was approved by the United States Congress in February 1875 and signed by President Grant on 1 March 1875. The legislative provisions guaranteed that everyone, regardless of race, skin color or previous condition of slavery was entitled to the same treatment in public places, for example transport and taverns.
In 1883, the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional claiming that the congress had no power to regulate the conduct of individuals. The XIV amendment prohibits discrimination as long as it is a state that commits them, and not an individual; however many of the provisions of the law were reinserted in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and in the Fair Housing Act using federal power to regulate inter-state trade.
Answer:
"Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan."
Explanation:
On December 8, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed the nation in a speech that would become one of the most pivotal and iconic in American history. Mere hours earlier, the United States had suffered a devastating surprise attack by the Imperial Japanese Navy on the naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii.
Though America had up until that point maintained neutrality in the brewing global conflict of World War II, the unprovoked assault on Pearl Harbor would prove to be the catalyst that pulled the slumbering giant into the fray.
In his historic speech, Roosevelt condemned the "date which will live in infamy" - December 7, 1941 - when the Japanese carrier fleet unleashed their assault on the unsuspecting base, killing over 2,400 Americans and severely crippling the US Navy's Pacific fleet.
The visceral reaction of the American public to the heinous and unprompted attack unified the nation and led Roosevelt to make his immortal declaration that the United States could not sit idly by.
The very next day, December 8th, Congress declared war upon the Empire of Japan, officiating America's entry into the deadliest military conflict in human history.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
"Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan."
Mao's Great Leap Forward aimed to rapidly convert China into a significant industrial power by emphasizing industrialization and collectivization, often at the expense of the country's rural farming communities.
The main goal of Mao's Great Leap Forward was to rapidly transform China into a modern industrial nation and to improve its economic standing on the world stage. This ambitious plan, which was launched in 1958, involved an aggressive push towards industrialization and collectivization. The rural farming communities were targeted to be transformed into large, industrialized communes. These communes were intended to both fulfill the agricultural needs of the country and to simultaneously produce industrial goods like steel. However, the Great Leap Forward often led to disastrous consequences, including widespread famine and economic instability.
#SPJ6
Now it’s your turn to write about an event or idea from two different perspectives. During the American Revolution, ideas were often written on posters. At the time of the Vietnam War, they were shared through radio and television. Today, people and groups post their thoughts on the Internet using social media sites or share them through text messages. Follow the directions below to write a conversation about a current event topic through text message, instant message, or status updates.
1. Choose one of the following topics for your conversation:
Soda tax — Should people have to pay an extra tax on soda or junk food?
2. Research your topic using the Internet or other reference material. You may want to start with local or national newspapers, television news sources, or online encyclopedias. Please contact your instructor if you are unable to find appropriate sources. You may also want to review this learning object for tips on finding and using information.
3. Write a conversation between two people with different perspectives on your topic. Your conversation can be in the form of instant messages, text messages, or social media status updates. You may use this template to complete your assessment. Your conversation should include the following:
A total of at least five entries for each side (10 entries total—two to three sentences each)
Accurate facts used to support both perspectives
At least two properly cited sources used for research
Thank you so much if you actually help me I promise you that I will give you 20 extra points and brainliest! I promise! although I have ADHD T-T so you will have to remind me to give it to you because I will forget.
I agree that Should people have to pay an extra tax on soda or junk food. This is known as the soda tax and it's important to curb obesity and improve the health of the people.
A sugary drink tax, soda tax, or sweetened beverage tax is a tax or surcharge imposed on sweetened beverages in order to reduce their consumption. Carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, and energy drinks are common beverages subject to a soda tax.
Soda taxes are sometimes referred to as a "corrective" or "sin tax" because, unlike general sales taxes, they are used to discourage the purchase of soda because the decision to consume it has costs for both the user and others (such as increased health care costs).
This policy intervention is an attempt to reduce obesity and the health consequences of being overweight; however, the medical evidence supporting the health benefits of a sugar tax is of very low certainty.
Sugary drink taxes are an effective intervention to reduce sugar consumption.
Learn more about tax on:
#SPJ1
Choose the Soda tax as your topic. Have two people with different perspectives on the issue discuss it in a text message or social media format. Use valid facts and references to support each side's argument. Repeat this format for a total of 5 entries per side.
Choosing the Soda tax as the topic, we can let Person A represent the perspective of someone in favor of the tax, and Person B represent the perspective of someone against it.
Person A: I believe soda taxes could help tackle obesity by reducing consumption of sugary drinks. In 2017, a study published in JAMA found that after Berkeley, California implemented a soda tax, consumption of sugared drinks fell 21%.
Person B: However, soda taxes can be regressive, disproportionately affecting lower-income households. According to the Tax Foundation, poorer families tend to spend a larger proportion of their budget on groceries, including sodas.
Repeat this format for a total of 5 entries per side. Remember to use factual evidence to support each perspective and properly cite your sources.
#SPJ3