Around 1500 B.C., Egyptian leaders sent armies in to overpower Kush. For nearly 500 years, Kush would be controlled by the Egyptians, and would be forced to pay the Pharaoh a tribute. Eventually, however, around 1000 B.C., Kush was able to turn the tables, winning their freedom from Egypt. Then, in 724 B.C., led by a Kushite king named Piankhi, a large and well trained Kushite army was able to invade Egypt and control it.
In 671 B.C., the Assyrians, who had superior weaponry, were able to run the Kushites out of Egypt, and rule it for themselves. The Assyrians used iron weapons, which were harder and more powerful than the bronze weapons that the Kushites used.
After leaving Egypt and returning to their original borders, the Kingdom of Kush entered a golden age. For the next 150 years, the Kushites grew wealthy. They were able to build large comfortable homes, and plan beautiful cities. This golden age was, however, brought to an end by a people known as the Axums, who invaded around 500 B.C. from the East.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
America's Self-belief of Value System
Explanation:
In his play, The Crucible, Arthur Miller illustrates the self-belief of Americans who are sure of possessing the true value system to guide the entire world. This value system, Americans believe, should be a guiding light for the rest of the world to follow. This sort of ideology has helped Americans since it stopped them falling prey to other ideologies. At the same time, it causes troubles for Americans since other countries may not like the idea or oppose this self-made value system.
Roe v. Wade
Gideon v. Wainright
Tinker v. Des Moines
Mapp v. Ohio
I believe the answer is: Mapp v Ohio
Mapp v Ohio was considered to be a landmark case in which united states court ruled out that the agents of justice departments are banned to conduct "unreasonable search and seizures". This make polices unable to search a private property without a warrant unless they hear a scream, cry for help or gun shot.
A Supreme Court case founded that it was unauthorized to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant is Mapp v. Ohio. Furthermore, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a breakthrough case in criminal process, in which the United States Supreme Court determined that evidence gained in abuse of the Fourth Amendment which defends opposed to "unreasonable seizures and searches," cannot be operated in state courts, state law criminal trials, and federal criminal law trials in federal courts as had previously been the law.
EXPLANATION:
The Supreme Court completed this by usage of a popular standard as selective integration; in Mapp this included the integration of the necessities, as construed by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is related only to acts of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment expected process clause which is related to acts of the states.
Particular investigations don't need a search warrant. For example,
• Consent: a permit is not needed when an individual in control of the property or object gives consent for the investigation.
• Hot chase of a criminal (to avert a criminal’s escape or aptitude to harm others);
• Forthcoming demolition of proof: where evidence might be demolished before an investigation can be properly gained;
• Emergency investigations: such as where there is somebody is heard yelling for help inside a residence; or
• Investigation incident to capture (to alleviate the risk of damage to the seizing officers specifically).
• Public safety: a warrantless investigation may be allowable in an emergency condition where the public is in a risky situation.
• Plain view: the proof is in the basic view of law enforcement officials, from a legal vantage point (with similar exclusions that involve basic smell, where the officer notices a scent that shows the occurrence of criminal activity or contraband).
In the case of a plain view, the official is legally on the assertions, his surveillance is from a lawful vantage point, and it is instantly obvious that the proof is contraband. The plain view rule implements, for instance, when the official has dragged the accused for a seat belt defilement and ensures a syringe on the seat of the passenger.
LEARN MORE
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? brainly.com/question/2507015
KEYWORDS : unreasonable searches and seizures, Mapp v. Ohio
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : American Law History
O A The Ottoman Empire successfully pursued mercantilist economic policies.
B Ottoman citizens unified by their recent conversion to Islam were strongly motivated
to conquer.
C Exploitation of artillery and small arms gave the Ottomans advantages over many of
their political rivals
D The decentralized federalism of the Ottoman Empire encouraged competition and
technological innovation
Answer:
The correct answer is option D "The decentralized federalism of the Ottoman Empire encouraged competition and technological innovation"
Explanation:
Ottoman Empire made by Turkish clans in Anatolia (Asia Minor) that developed to be one of the most impressive states on the planet during the fifteenth and sixteenth hundreds of years. The Ottoman Empire time frame crossed over 600 years and reached a conclusion just in 1922, when it was supplanted by the Turkish Republic and different replacement states in southeastern Europe and the Center East. At its tallness the realm incorporated the majority of southeastern Europe to the doors of Vienna, including present-day Hungary, the Balkan area, Greece, and parts of Ukraine; bits of the Center East currently involved by Iraq, Syria, Israel, and Egypt; North Africa as far west as Algeria; and huge pieces of the Bedouin Landmass. The term "Ottoman" is a dynastic epithet gotten from Osman I (Arabic: ʿUthmān), the traveling Turkmen boss who established both the administration and the Empire around 1300.
The major cause of the expansion of the Ottoman Empire in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries was the exploitation of artillery and small arms that gave the Ottomans military advantages over their rivals.
The major cause of the expansion of the Ottoman Empire in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries was option C: Exploitation of artillery and small arms gave the Ottomans advantages over many of their political rivals. The Ottomans were able to use advanced weapons such as cannons and muskets to overpower their enemies on the battlefield. This technology gave them a military advantage and allowed them to expand their empire.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Indulgences could reduce the amount of time spent in purgatory. Indulgences were sold to raise money for the church’s increasing expense.
Explanation:
A. To show his appreciation for soldiers regardless of whether they fight for the North or South.
B. To encourage soldiers by bringing up a war that the USwon
C. To emphasize that the US was founded on the principle of freedom for all people.
Answer:
C. To emphasize that the US was founded on the principle of freedom for all people.
Explanation:
The Gettysburg address was an address that the President Lincoln gave to the public at Gettysburg Pennsylvania and it is the most famous address by the presiden Lincoln, he speaks about the principles on which the United States were founded, firmly believing on equality and freedom for all people, this was crucial because the fight agaisnt slavery was at its peak.
b. An influential congressman secured the site for his district.
c. It was a favorable geographic location for launches.
d. There already was a large Air Force base there.
Its C! i took the same test