Answer:
Besause He thinks there is a difference between murdering someone is cold blood and letting someone else die by your inaction.
Philosopher Jan Narveson argues that we are not guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve. He believes that our moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.
Philosopher Jan Narveson does not believe that we are guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve to death. Narveson argues that we are not responsible for the harm caused by our inaction, as long as we do not interfere with others' ability to fulfill their basic needs. According to Narveson, moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.
#SPJ11
Answer:
D) none of the above
Explanation:
Mealco's statements constitute tortious interference, i.e. Mealco is intentionally interfering with an existent business relationship between other parties. Currently, Galley and the Palm Crest Hotel have a valid contract and Mealco is trying to convince one party (Palm Crest Hotel) to breach their contract with Galley. Galley can sue Mealco for tortious interference and seek recovery damages.
Answer: Duckalo's free cash flow = $30,000
Given:
Net cash flow from operating activities = $110,000
Purchases of equipment = $80,000
Repurchases of stock = $18,000
We can compute free cash flow as :
Free cash flow = Net cash provided by operating activities - cash payments for planned investments in long-term assets - cash dividends
Free cash flow = $110,000 - $80,000 - $0 =$ 30,000
Answer:
Real Exchange Rate computed as German goods per U.S. goods: 2
Explanation:
Cost in the US: 0.50 dollar
Cost in Germany: 1 euro
Real Exchange Rate: German Goods / U.S. Goods
Real Exchange Rate: 1 / 0.50 = 2
The real exchange rate measures the price of foreign goods relative to the price of domestic goods.
Answer:
Partnership
Explanation:
A partnership is a business established by two or more people, who are co-owners of the partnership.
Some of the advantages of setting a partnership over a sole proprietorship are:
Some of the advantages of setting a partnership over a corporation are:
A.
avoid all conflicting goals altogether
B.
prioritize and restructure your goals
C.
engage in just one of the conflicting goals
D.
attain the more profitable goals first
prioritize and restructure your goals
Answer:B prioritise and restructure your goals
Explanation: Having conflicting goals maybe draining but that means you are having many paths to move on and choosing one while neglecting other is of no use if you believe in experimenting every field . Prioritise what’s important and set rankings to avoid confusion and seek goals accordingly .