Answer:
Conspiring with negroes to produce insurrection" Treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia Murder
Explanation:
i have a time machine and i saw it myself
Which line from the paragraph uses a narrative technique to paint a picture for readers?
A. Raul and I argued about the science project.
B. He crossed his arms over his chest and spoke in a strained voice.
C. [W]hich one of us would have an idea about how to solve our differences?
D. Maybe it was time to talk to our science teacher.
Answer:
A. Raul and I argued about the science project.
Explanation:
Narrative passages are often said or written directly through a first person's perspective with the pronoun 'I'. At the same time, it may also use a third person perspective like 'he' or 'she' in the passage.
Here, the sentence "Raul and I argued about the science project." uses both the first person perspective and third person perspective. Thus, the readers can easily understand through this line that the paragraph uses a narrative technique to paint a picture.
A federal scout is an individual employed by the government to gather information, conduct reconnaissance, and provide intelligence on specific areas, territories, or situations.
Reconnaissance refers to the act of obtaining information or gathering intelligence about a specific area, situation, or enemy. In the context of a federal scout, reconnaissance involves conducting observations, surveys, and assessments to gather valuable data.
This could include identifying geographical features, assessing security risks, monitoring activities, or collecting strategic information.
By engaging in reconnaissance, federal scouts aid in decision-making processes, support operational planning, and contribute to the overall situational awareness of government agencies.
Their role is crucial in acquiring accurate and timely information to facilitate effective decision-making and enhance the safety and efficiency of government operations.
Learn more about Reconnaissance here:
#SPJ6
B. Too much power in the state governments
C. Too little power for the courts
D. A too small legislature
The correct answer is B) too much power in the state governments.
The Articles of Confederation was America's first attempt at a Constitution. Considering their negative experience with King George III and a large central government, the writers of the Articles of Confederation made it so that the US gave almost all the power to state governments.
This idea ended up working out terribly. The federal government could not collect taxes, could not establish a national currency (aka money), and struggled to build a militia. This was all because state governments had the ability to ignore the wishes of the federal government. The Articles of Confederation were replaced with our current US Constitution after about a decade.
There were few issues related to first draft of Articles of Confederation such as it gave too much power in the central government and too little power for the courts.
Further Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the agreement within the 13 States of USA which were part of the first constitution. Once all 13 states gave their approval in regards to The Articles of Confederation, it was implemented and it came into force 1781. The farmers of the constitution thought that it was important to have a national judiciary. This article clearly showed that there was distrust among the people of United States of America in regards to a strong central government within the country which takes all the actions and makes all the laws for the welfare of the country and it was the start of ‘American Revolution” another issue which these Articles had was the lack of judiciary became problem as there were issues between states and they always stood against each other in courts as if one verdict came in a case against one state then that state would not accept that verdict. This problem was seen by the people who made the constitution and wanted to make all states to work with each other, Articles of Confederation needed to be changed or scrapped completely which was lastly done. Articles of Confederation lasted for period of 8 years and were replaced by the current constitution of United States in year 1789.
Learn more:
1. Which was a result of the peace conference led by prince Metternich of Austria? brainly.com/question/3732790
2. Why did pope Gregory vii and Henry iv come into conflict? brainly.com/question/389685
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Articles of Confederation
Keywords: Articles of Confederation, Distrust, State disputes, Court disputes, Constitution, Agreement, United States of America, Scrapped, Adoptions, Judiciary.
Answer:
Bias
Explanation:
The person in question probably has a bias towards installing a drill site because they come from a company that profits from this.