Answer:
true it is true two inter
The length of that altitude is 5 cm.
Explanation
According to the below diagram, is a parallelogram with diagonal as its altitude.
Suppose, the length of side is cm.
As the length of one side is 1 cm longer than the length of the other, so the length of side will be:
Given that, the perimeter of the parallelogram is 50 cm. So, the equation will be.....
So, the length of is 12 cm and the length of is (12+1)= 13 cm.
Suppose, the length of the altitude() is cm.
Now, in right angle triangle , using Pythagorean theorem....
So, the length of that altitude is 5 cm.
Well, yes and no.
Yes, because the straight line needs to pass through a number greater than 0, and 1 is obviously greater than 0.
However, y = x + 1 is not the same as y = x.
hope this helps.! let me know if it's in any way confusing..
I'd be happy to help!
9514 1404 393
Answer:
see below for a table
Step-by-step explanation:
You can easily identify intercept points by solving for one variable when the other is zero.
x-intercept (y=0)
4x = 12
x = 12/4 = 3
y-intercept (x=0)
-3y = 12
y = 12/-3 = -4
So, the coordinate pairs of these points are ...
(3, 0) and (0, -4)
__
If you solve for y, you get ...
-3y = 12 -4x
y = (4/3)x -4 . . . . . divide by -3
This suggests that x being a multiple of 3 will be useful for finding integer values of y.
We already have points for x=0 and x=3. We can add points for x=6 and x=-3.
y = 4/3(6) -4 = 4
y = 4/3(-3) -4 = -8
So, the additional points are ...
(6, 4) and (-3, -8)
Answer:X=3
y= -4
Step-by-step explanation:
If we're solving for x or y, then the intercept we're not solving for is equal to zero. Solving for y means x=0, solving for x means y=0.
so solving for x, 4x=12--> x=3, since y=0 in this scenario.
Solving for y, x=0, so -3y=12--> y=(-4)
b. diagonals that are congruent.
c. four congruent sides.
d. consecutive angles that are supplementary.
B) tenants in common.
C) in severalty.
D) a general partnership.
Answer:
B) tenants in common.
Explanation:
There were two men, first was James Smith, and second was Bill Ross who bought a property mutually for their business venture by declared proportionate interest of 1/3 as well as 2/3 sequentially without the right regarding survivorship. Both of them want their shares to be acquired by their spouses'. Both hold a partnership but not a company. James, as well as Bill, most likely took the title as tenants in common.Because tenants in common possess versatility in whence they divide control as well as assign the rights concerning survivorship. Joint tenants, on the different hand, keep the property in similar shares while a common partnership is a business unit serving separate sharers. Severalty, as asserted beforehand, is individual ownership.