Answer:
1.) Everything that moves, will eventually come to a stop. Rest is the “natural” state of all objects
Of all physics misconceptions, this is the most common. Even the great philosopher Aristotle, included it into his most important contribution to the field, his famous Laws of Motion. But now we know it is wrong because Newton’s First Law of Motion tells us that “everything at rest will stay at rest, and everything in motion will stay in motion, unless acted upon by an external force.”
The first statement seems reasonable enough, but the second part is a little bit murky. The reason this confusion persists boils down to the fact that we are unable to identify the force that stops all motion, which is friction. Friction is a force that acts between two objects that are in contact and are moving relative to each other. When we roll a ball, it stops because of the frictional force acting between it and the floor.
2.) A continuous force is needed for continuous motion
This misconception is a direct consequence of the first one. While this is true, if you are, for example, pushing a grocery cart in a supermarket, again this is only because there is friction involved. The force you apply to keep an object moving is only to counteract the frictional force. If you were to throw a rock on outer space, it would travel with a constant velocity forever, unless it hits something, of course. This is because space is mostly empty (it has trace elements of gas and dust throughout), and there would not be any frictional force acting on that rock.
3.) An object is hard to push because it is heavy
This is one of the most common misconceptions because it’s something we see and feel everyday. While a heavy object is really hard to push, it is not because of its weight, but because of its inertia or mass. Inertia is an objects resistance to change in motion. It is important to note that inertia is resistance to “change motion” rather than just motion itself. When, I was a kid, I imagined that it would be easy to carry and push massive objects when in outer space, but not surprisingly, my younger self was wrong.,
With that said… Since these objects still have mass despite being weightless, this mass represents the object’s inertia.
4.) Planets revolve around the sun because they are pushed by gravity
We have to remember that gravity — the weakest of the four fundamental forces — is an attractive force. The reason why planets revolve around the Sun can be chalked up to the fact that the planets were already spinning within the protoplanetary disk encircling a young Sun. Gravity merely keeps the planets in orbit around the Sun, but it isn’t necessarily the one thing pushing the planets along their orbital plane.
5.) Heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones
This misconception is already debunked long ago by Galileo on his experiment when he dropped two objects with different masses on the Leaning Tower of Pisa. He has shown on that experiment that objects move downward with the same acceleration.
Again, the problem comes from not being able to identify another force that is involved, which is air resistance. All objects moving through air, and hence, all falling objects, experience air resistance. This force is proportional to the area of the object in the direction of motion. Usually, this force is negligible, but for light objects — with weight comparable to the air resistance, like a feather — it will have a big effect. This is ultimately confirmed by the famous hammer and feather drop experiment on the moon.
6.) There is no gravity in outer space
There is gravity in outer space, it is just weaker than what we experience here on Earth. Astronauts that are orbiting the Earth don’t experience gravity because they are free-falling (yes, you read that right). All satellites, including the moon and the planets, are in a constant state of freefall.
They just also have a tangential velocity with their free fall, that is why they don’t crash to what they are orbiting. When something is in free fall, it becomes weightless. This is why Kate Upton can do a photo shoot in zero gravity here on Earth. The plane that they are riding in actually went into free fall to do that.
7.) Planets move in circular orbits around the Sun
Planets actually move in elliptical orbits around the sun (with the Sun being the focus of the ellipse). This is actually the first of Kepler’s Three Laws of Planetary Motion, which deals with precisely how planets orbit the Sun.
One misconception deals with our seasons. Some might wrongly come to the conclusion that Earth’s proximity to the Sun dictates the seasons (summer is when Earth is closest to the Sun and winter is when it’s farther away), but that’s not entirely true. In reality, our seasons are caused by the tilt of Earth’s axis.
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the missing circuit diagram
answer : 3 unique currents
Explanation:
From the circuit attached below it can be seen that there will be Three(3) unique currents flowing through this circuit and the Branches where this currents could differ is at the Three(3) resistors
(B) 100 s
(C) 150 s
(D) 200 s
Answer:
option (B)
Explanation:
Power, P = 600 W
mass of water, m = 250 g = 0.250 kg
T1 = 20° C
T2 = 80° C
ΔT = 80 - 20 = 60
specific heat of water, c = 4200 J/kg °C
Let the time taken is t.
Power x time = mass of water x specific heat of water x rise in temperature
600 x t = 0.250 x 4200 x 60
t = 105 second
option (B)
To heat 250g of water from 20°C to 80°C using a 600W microwave, it would approximately take 100 seconds.
In order to solve this problem, we first need to know the specific heat capacity of water, which is approximately 4.18 J/g°C. This value represents the amount of energy required to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Given this value, we'll need to use the formula q = mcΔT, where q is the energy transferred (in joules), m is the mass of the water (in grams), c is the specific heat capacity (in J/g°C), and ΔT is the change in temperature (in °C).
We're given that the initial temperature of water is 20°C and we want to heat it to 80°C, so ΔT = 80°C - 20°C = 60°C. Substituting the known values into the formula, we get: q = 250g * 4.18 J/g°C * 60°C = 62700 J. Now, we know that power (P) = q/t. Given that the microwave oven operates at 600 W (or 600 J/s), we can solve for t: 62700 J ÷ 600 J/s ≈ 104.5 seconds. So, the closest answer would be (B) 100 seconds, considering the approximate value.
#SPJ3
Answer and Explanation:
We know that resistance from the given equation of resistance it is clear that resistance depends on resistivity length and area of the material but we can not change the length because it is given that the length must be 2.5 cm long.
So we can do two two things to reduce the resistance
Answer:
m_cable = 2,676 kg
Explanation:
For this exercise we must look for the acceleration with the kinematic ce relations
v² = v₀² + 2 a x
since the block starts from rest, its initial velocity is vo = 0
a = v² / 2x
a = 4.2² /(2 2.0)
a = 4.41 m / s²
now we can use Newton's second law
Note that the mass that the extreme force has to drag is the mass of the block plus the mass of the cable.
F = (m + m_cable) a
m_cable = F / a -m
m_cable = 100 / 4.41 - 20
m_cable = 2,676 kg
Unfortunately, the information given does not provide enough data to determine the mass of the steel cable. This is because the force, acceleration, and distance information given only involve the mass of the block, not the cable.
The question is requesting the mass of the steel cable. However, given the information in the question, we don't actually have enough data to determine this. The application of the force, the acceleration of the block, and the distance it covers are all connected through Newton's second law (F = ma) and the equations of motion, but these only involve the mass of the block, not the mass of the cable. Even if we assumed the cable applies the entire 100 N force to the block, this would only allow us to solve for the acceleration of the block, not the mass of the cable. Therefore, the mass of the steel cable cannot be determined with the information provided in the question.
#SPJ12
Answer:4N
Explanation:
mass=4kg
Acceleration=1m/s^2
Force=mass x acceleration
Force=4 x 1
Force=4N
Answer:
v_2=4.53m/s
Explanation:
In order to solve the exercise it is necessary to apply the energy conservation equation,
The equation says the following,
Replacing the formula for I of a sphere, we have
In this way we get the expression
We proceed to replace with the given values and obtain that
v_2=4.53m/sv_2=4.53m/s
mgdsin(0) + 1/2mv2/1 = 1/2mv2/2 + 1/2Iw^2
mgdsin(0) + 1/2mv2/1 = 1/2mv2/2 + 1/2 2/5mr^2 (v2/r)^2
mgdsin(0) + 1/2mv2/1 = 1/2mv2/2 + 1/5mv2/2 = 7/10mv2/2
10/7gdsin(0) + 5/7v2/1 = v2/2
v2 = sqrt(10/7gdsin(0) + 5/7v2/1)
v2 = sqrt(10/7 * 9.8 * 3sin(26)) + 5/7 * 1.75^2
v2 = 4.53m/s
The ball that rolls on the plane will experience two movements at once, namely the rotation of the axis of the ball and the translational field being traversed. Therefore, objects that do rolling motion have a rotational equation and a translational equation. The amount of kinetic energy possessed by the rolling body is the amount of rotational kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy. You will here learn about the ball rolling on a plane and incline.
An object can experience translational motion or rotational motion. Translational motion is the motion of objects whose direction is straight or curved. In translational motion using the concept of Newton II's law. While the rotational motion is the motion that has a rotation of a particular shaft. Rotational motion is caused by the torque, which is the tendency of a force to rotate a rigid body against a particular pivot point.
Learn More
Object Experience brainly.com/question/13696852
The ball that rolls brainly.com/question/13707126
Details
Grade: College
Subject: Physics
Keyword: object, ball, roll