Answer: II Contributions to the separate account are not tax deductible
III Earnings in the separate account build tax-deferred
Explanation:
Variable Annuities represent an investment vehicle where one puts money in a certain type of investment with the goal being that they will earn an income in retirement which is dependent on how their chosen investment performed therefore making the payout variable.
Contributions to the separate account are not tax deductible. The tax advantage of Variable annuity contracts instead is that the income earned from the annuity gets to build tax-deferred with taxes only applying to them when a withdrawal is made.
b. the higher the required rate of return on an investment
c. the lower the maturity premium required by the investors
d. the higher the money supply in the economy
e. the lower the tax rate in the economy
Answer: b. the higher the required rate of return on an investment
Explanation: Inflation is an increase in the general level of prices or in the cost of living. It is the decline in the value of money and as such it erodes the purchasing power of future cash flows or investments. All things being equal, higher inflation rates (current or expected) equates to rising yields across the yield curve. As a result, investors demand this higher yield to account for the risk of inflation. This makes option b the only option that is true and accurate.
The higher the expected rate of inflation, the higher the required rate of return on an investment.
The correct answer is b. The higher the expected rate of inflation, the higher the required rate of return on an investment. When the expected rate of inflation is high, investors require a higher rate of return to compensate for the loss in purchasing power of their money. This is because high inflation erodes the value of money over time, reducing the real return on an investment. Therefore, investors demand a higher rate of return to maintain their purchasing power.
#SPJ3
Answer:
B. The cost of the building will include the cost of replacing the roof.
b. You learn that Maxine’s current at-risk basis in her investment is $1,000 and that her share of the current loss is expected to be $13,000. Based on these facts, how will her loss be treated?
c. After reviewing her situation, Maxine’s financial adviser suggests that she invest at least an additional $12,000 in Teal to ensure a full loss deduction in the current year. How do you react to his suggestion?
d. What would you suggest Maxine consider as she attempts to maximize her current year deductible loss?
Answer:
Explanation:
a) What was the accountant referring to in his comment?
The accountant was referring to the fact that because passive activity losses can only offset passive activity income, she will not be able to deduct the losses in this year. However, she would be able to carry forward the loss to future years to offset any passive activity income generated in those years.
b) You learn that Maxine's current at-risk basis in her investment is $1,000 and that her share of the current loss is expected to be $13,000. Based on these facts, how will her loss be treated?
Based upon the fact that her basis in her investment is only $1000, her losses will be of that amount because of the at-risk limitation, which limits the taxpayer’s deduction by the amount “at risk”. If there is no passive activity income, this would be carried forward to when Maxine would dispose of her entire interest.
c) After reviewing her situation, Maxine's financial adviser suggests that she invest at least an additional $12,000 in Teal to ensure a full loss deduction in the current year. How do you react to his suggestion?
I believe that her financial adviser’s advice to Maxine is a good idea because if her current lossis expected to be $13,000, by contributing $12,000 in Teal, she would be able to deduct the full basis of $13,000 invested into the company. If there is no passive activity income, this would be carried forward to when Maxine would dispose of her entire interest in Teal.
d) What would you suggest Maxine consider as she attempts to maximize her current year deductible loss? She should consider the advice given to her by her accountant.
Answer:
a.
C(y) = mx + b
y = cost in dollars
x = amount of chemical
m = per unit variable cost
b = fixed cost
b.
Use High low Method to calculate the Variable cost from the total cost given
Variable Cost = ( Highest activity cost - Lowest activity cost ) / ( Highest Number of Units - Lowest Number of Units )
Variable Cost = ( $2,200 - $1,200 ) / ( 150 - 50 )
Variable Cost = $1,000 / 100
Variable Cost = $10 per unit
Fixed Cost = $2,200 - ( 150 x $10 )
Fixed Cost = $2,200 - $1,500
Fixed Cost = $700
c.
Contribution Per Unit = Price - Variable cost
Contribution Per Unit = $15 - $10
Contribution Per Unit = $5
Break-even point = $700 / $5
Break-even point = 140 Pounds
d.
Revenue = 140 x $15 = $2,100
Cost = 140 x 10 = $1,400
Answer: Option D
Explanation: Enterprise zones are established by the government with the objective of development and economic growth in the local neighborhood.
The investors are attracted to make their business centers or production units in such areas by giving them incentives such as tax exemptions or other such benefits.
These are made usually in under developed areas. In countries like China and India, these areas are called special economic zones.
Answer:
Total Return = 10.45%
Explanation:
To calculate the return, we must first determine the appreciation in the value of the securities in terms of the US dollar.
The initial investment in terms of US dollar was of,
Initial Investment in USD = Investment in Pounds * Exchange rate
Initial Investment in USD = 2340 * 1.52
Initial Investment in USD = $3556.8
The current value of the investment in terms of USD is,
Current value of investment in USD = 2440 * 1.61
Current value of investment in USD = $3928.4
The formula to calculate total return is,
Total Return = (Current Value - Initial Value) / Initial Value
So, the total return based on US dollars was:
Total return = (3928.4 - 3556.8) / 3556.8
Total Return = 0.10447 or 10.447% rounded off to 10.45%
The total return for the U.S. investor in U.S. dollars is a profit of $371.60, calculated by assessing the change in the value of British securities from 2,340 to 2,440 pounds and considering the exchange rate shift from $1.52 to $1.61 per pound.
The question involves calculating the total return for a U.S. investor based on the change in the value of British securities and exchange rates. The investor originally purchased British securities for 2,340 pounds at an exchange rate of $1.52 per pound. One year later, the securities are worth 2,440 pounds, and the exchange rate is $1.61 per pound. The initial U.S. dollar investment would have been 2,340 pounds × $1.52 = $3,556.80. The value of the securities in U.S. dollars after one year is now 2,440 pounds × $1.61 = $3,928.40.
This results in a profit of $3,928.40 - $3,556.80 = $371.60, which represents the investor's total return based on U.S. dollars.