Answer:
Explanation:
a) What was the accountant referring to in his comment?
The accountant was referring to the fact that because passive activity losses can only offset passive activity income, she will not be able to deduct the losses in this year. However, she would be able to carry forward the loss to future years to offset any passive activity income generated in those years.
b) You learn that Maxine's current at-risk basis in her investment is $1,000 and that her share of the current loss is expected to be $13,000. Based on these facts, how will her loss be treated?
Based upon the fact that her basis in her investment is only $1000, her losses will be of that amount because of the at-risk limitation, which limits the taxpayer’s deduction by the amount “at risk”. If there is no passive activity income, this would be carried forward to when Maxine would dispose of her entire interest.
c) After reviewing her situation, Maxine's financial adviser suggests that she invest at least an additional $12,000 in Teal to ensure a full loss deduction in the current year. How do you react to his suggestion?
I believe that her financial adviser’s advice to Maxine is a good idea because if her current lossis expected to be $13,000, by contributing $12,000 in Teal, she would be able to deduct the full basis of $13,000 invested into the company. If there is no passive activity income, this would be carried forward to when Maxine would dispose of her entire interest in Teal.
d) What would you suggest Maxine consider as she attempts to maximize her current year deductible loss? She should consider the advice given to her by her accountant.
Answer:
$20,790,000
Explanation:
Since the estimated total costs to complete had not change, the Construction is Process can be estimated as follows:
Construction in Process = Estimated total completion cost - Total costs of completion to date = $38,500,000 - $17,710,000 = $20,790,000
Answer:
Y = C+ I +G +NX
Explanation:
We know,
The national spending approach is also known as the expenditure approach. According to the expenditure approach, all the goods and services that make up the gross domestic product will be applied to individual consumption, investment, and government expenditure. It also modifies the net exports and imports of a country. Therefore, option A is the correct answer as the expenditure approach, Y = C+ I +G +NX.
The national spending approach to splitting GDP is represented by the equation Y = C + I + G + (X - M).
The national spending approach to splitting GDP is represented by the equation Y = C + I + G + (X - M). This equation includes consumption (C), investment (I), government spending (G), and net exports (X - M). Net exports are calculated by subtracting imports (M) from exports (X).
#SPJ12
Answer:
$155 per unit
Explanation:
Calculation for what The absorption costing unit product cost was:
Using this formula
Absorption costing unit product cost = Direct material + Direct labour + Variable manufacturing overheads + (Fixed manufacturing overheads / Number of units produced)
Let plug in the formula
Absorption costing unit product cost = $60+ $54+ $4 + ( $ 236,800/6,400 )
Absorption costing unit product cost =$60+ $54+ $4 + $37
Absorption costing unit product cost = $155 per unit
Therefore The absorption costing unit product cost was:$155 per unit
Answer: George's initial price markup over marginal cost was approximately 41.2% George's desired markup is 45% Since George's initial markup, or actual margin, was Less than his desired margin, raising the price was profitable
Explanation:
a) Price Elasticity of Demand = [(Q1-Q2)/(Q1+Q2)] / [(P1-P2)/(P1+P2)]
= 5000- 4000/4000+ 5000) / 8.50- 9.50 /8.50 ₊9.50 =
1000/8000 / -1/ 18 = 0.125/-0.055 = -2.2
George's initial price markup over marginal cost was approximately
when Marginal cost = $5
b)initial price markup = Price - marginal cost / price = 8.50 - 5.00/ 8.50 = 0.412= 41.2%
C) George's desired margin = 1/absolute value of price elasticity = 1/ 2.2= 0.45= 45%
.
D)Since George's initial markup or actual margin was less than his desired margin, raising the price is profitable.
This is because When the markup is lower than the margin, business is running on a loss, so it is nessesary to increase price.
The price elasticity of demand for George's T-shirts is approximately -1.7, indicating that demand is elastic. The initial markup over the cost price was 70%, but the question doesn't specify the desired markup or if raising the price satisfied that margin.
The price elasticity of demand measures how sensitive the quantity demanded is to a price change. It's calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price. In George's case:
So, the percentage change in quantity = (4000-5000)/5000 = -20% and percentage change in price = ($9.50-$8.50)/$8.50 = 11.76%. Therefore, price elasticity of demand = -20%/11.76% = -1.7 (approx.). This indicates that the demand is elastic, meaning quantity demanded is sensitive to price changes.
Regarding the price markup, this is the percentage increase over the cost price. The initial markup = ($8.50-$5)/$5 = 70%. The question didn't specify the desired markup, or if raising the price satisfied the desired margin.
#SPJ3
Answer: They would want to change the corporate charter to allow cumulative voting instead of noncumulative voting.
$277,062
B.
$252,838
C.
$113,550
D.
$163,512
Answer:
D.$163,512
Explanation:
Depletion expense is a charge against profits for the use of natural resources.
Depletion rate = cost to purchase resource/ number of units = $530,000/ 35,000 tons = $15.14 per ton
Depletion expense for 2019 = Depletion rate * number of units extracted and sold in 2019 = $15.14 * 10,800 = $163,512