Phosphorus is the element found in nucleic acids but not in proteins.
Keywords: DNA, RNA, Nitrogenous bases
Level: High school
Subject; Biology
Topic; Nucleic acids
Sub-topic: RNA and DNA structure
The element is found in nucleic acids but not in proteins are the Phosphorous.
Nucleic acids are polynucleotides, which are long chainlike polymers made up of essentially identical nucleotide building components. Each nucleotide is made up of a nitrogen-containing aromatic base that is linked to a pentose (five-carbon) sugar, which is then linked to a phosphate group.
Proteins are composed of hundreds or thousands of smaller units known as amino acids that are linked together in lengthy chains. A protein is made up of 20 different types of amino acids that can be mixed. The sequence of amino acids determines each protein's distinct three-dimensional structure and function.
Thus, Phosphorous is the element which is found in nucleic acid but not in proteins.
Learn more about Nucleic Acid here,
#SPJ6
Answer:
In the mentioned case, the intrinsic and environmental factors influencing the size of the population should also be included in the computer model. The population size is primarily predicted by environmental and intrinsic factors.
The size of the population of any species is monitored by the factors like birth rate, death rate, limiting factors, and their accessibility, carrying capacity of the system, rate of migration, and others. All these elements should be taken into consideration in order to determine the changes observed in the population of rabbits in a meadow.
Amino acids are coded for by triplet bases in RNA called _Codon_.
- 61 specify amino acids
- 3 are used as stop signals
- Adenine
- Guanine
- Uracil
- Cytosine
To know more about nucleotides base pair here
#SPJ2
b. eye spot
c. pseudopods
d. food vacuole
Answer:
b. increased efficiency in walking as forests transformed to wooded environments; the ability to carry food in order to provision family members.
Explanation:
Peter Rodman and his colleague proposed a 'patchy forest hypothesis' according to which forests become more patchy and the food in them is in dispersed form so, the hominids their can move efficiently with energy and can carry food now with free hands.
While Owen Lovejoy suggested that monogamous males, provision their females and protect them from predators, females that are provided with foods, could now take care of more than one offspring at a time, and thus reduce the gap between births.
Rodman proposed that human evolution was driven by efficiencies in walking due to environmental changes while Lovejoy suggested it was due to the ability to carry food and provision for family members.
Peter Rodman and Owen Lovejoy were anthropologists who each contributed significant theories about the forces that drove human evolution. According to their theories, Peter Rodman proposed that human evolution was linked to the increased efficiency in walking as forests transformed into wooded environments. This transformation would have required our ancestors to travel further for resources, thus selecting for those who could walk more efficiently. On the other hand, Owen Lovejoy suggested the best explanation was the ability to carry food in order to provide for family members. In his view, the capacity to carry food would have promoted pair bonding and increased survival of offspring, propelling human evolution.
#SPJ6