Answer:
its the third option
Step-by-step explanation:
the one with 2 rings on the second longest angle 2 lines on longest side one side and 1 line on the shortest side
All the described pairs of triangles that are reflected, rotated, or both, can be proven congruent by the SAS postulate because such rigid transformations preserve the congruency of sides and angles.
To determine which pair of triangles can be proven congruent by the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) postulate, we look for two sides of a triangle and the included angle that are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle. When a triangle is reflected across a line, rotated 90 degrees, or both reflected and rotated, it maintains its size and shape, thus the corresponding sides and angles remain congruent.
A reflection or rotation (including a combination of both) is a type of rigid transformation which preserves the size and shape of figures. Hence, all the given pairs of triangles can be proven congruent to the original triangle through the SAS postulate, as rigid transformations do not alter the congruity of sides and included angles.
#SPJ3
Step 1, all the exponents are multiplied by 3
Step 2, the exponents in the denominator are multiplied
Step 3, the exponents of the same base are subtracted during division
Step 3, the exponents of the same base are added during division
Answer:
Step 3, the exponents of the same base are added during division
Step-by-step explanation:
Name 3 fractions equivalent to:4/5