Answer:
3) It is an illegal tying arrangement.
Explanation:
Tying is said to be an illegal arrangement where, for one to buy a product, the consumer must purchase another product that exists in a separate market. There isn't any legal backing but things work out well for all parties involved.
Answer:
Fixed Cost 216,640
Explanation:
The first step is calculate the difference between activity levels
This tell us 25 units generated cost for 154,000
154,000 / 25 = Variable Cost = 6,250
Now we use either the low or high values to solve for fixedcost:
total = variable + fixed
fixed = total - variable
HIGH
Total Cost 500,000
Variable 283,360 (6,250 x 46)
Fixed Cost 216,640
LOW
Total Cost 346,000
Variable 129,360 (6,250 x 21)
Fixed Cost 216,640
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Department A:
Direct labor cost= $60,000
Manufacturing overhead= $90,000
Department B:
Manufacturing overhead= $45,000
Machine-hours= 2,000
To calculate the predetermined manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Department A:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 90,000/60,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $1.5 per direct labor dollar
Department B:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 45,000/2,000= $22.4 per machine-hour
Upon assessing the costs of adding new suppliers and potential losses from a super-event, Phillip Witt of Witt Input Devices should manage three suppliers. Each supplier acts as an insurance against the super-event, with the cost to manage a new supplier being less than the potential loss from a super-event.
In this scenario, the president of Witt Input Devices, Phillip Witt, should consider the cost of adding a supplier against the potential risk of having them all shut down, causing a significant loss. The disadvantage of getting a new supplier is the marginal cost, which is $14,800. On the other hand, the potential loss that the firm could suffer in the event of a super-event is $480,000.
To solve this scenario, you need to consider each supplier as a form of insurance against the super-event. By looking at the probability of the super-event, we can obtain the expected loss per year which is 3% of $480,000 (0.03 * 480000 = $14,400).
Considering all factors, it appears that it would be economically feasible for Phillip Witt to manage three suppliers because the expected potential loss is less than the expense of adding a new supplier. Therefore, his best strategy is to maintain all three suppliers to minimize the overall risk.
#SPJ12
To minimize costs, Witt Input Devices should consider the likelihood of a total shutdown and the cost of managing additional suppliers. By calculating the expected cost for different numbers of suppliers, we can determine the optimal number that minimizes costs. This decision depends on the specific probabilities and costs involved.
To determine the number of suppliers that Witt Input Devices should use, we need to consider the likelihood of a total shutdown due to a 'super-event' and the cost of managing additional suppliers. According to the given information, there is a 3% probability in any year of a 'super-event' shutting down all suppliers for at least 2 weeks, resulting in a cost of $480,000. The 'unique-event' risk for any individual supplier is 5%. To minimize the overall costs, we should calculate the optimal number of suppliers by comparing the cost of managing additional suppliers to the potential losses from a shutdown.
The marginal cost of managing an additional supplier is $14,800 per year. Let's assume that Witt Input Devices can choose up to three nearly identical local suppliers, and we need to find the ideal number of suppliers for minimizing costs. We can start with one supplier and calculate the expected cost. If there is a 'super-event,' the cost will be $480,000. If there is no 'super-event,' the cost will be the annual cost of managing one supplier, which is $14,800.
Next, we can calculate the expected cost for two suppliers. The probability of both suppliers being shut down due to a 'super-event' is the square of the individual risk, which is (0.03)^2 = 0.0009. The cost would then be $480,000. The probability of only one supplier being shut down is calculated as the sum of the probability of exactly one supplier being shut down multiplied by the probability of the other supplier not being shut down. This comes out to be 2 * (0.03) * (0.97) = 0.0582. In this case, the cost would be 2 * $14,800 = $29,600. Finally, the probability of both suppliers being operational is (0.97)^2 = 0.9409, resulting in a cost of 2 * $14,800 = $29,600. Therefore, the expected cost with two suppliers is 0.0009 * $480,000 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.9409 * $29,600.
We can extend this calculation to find the expected cost for three suppliers. The probabilities of all three suppliers being shut down, two suppliers being shut down and one supplier being operational, and one supplier being shut down and two suppliers being operational can be calculated using the same approach. The expected cost in this case will be 0.0009 * $480,000 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.9409 * $29,600.
By comparing the expected costs for each number of suppliers, we can determine the optimal number of suppliers that minimizes costs. The answer will be the number of suppliers with the lowest expected cost. The result will depend on the specific values of the probabilities and costs involved.
#SPJ2
Answer:
total ending WIP value 39,334.20
transferred-out 432.078.00
Explanation:
Ending work in proces inventory
we multiply the equivalent units by the cost per equivlent unit
materials 2,200 x 15.26 = 33,572
converion 940 x 6.13 = 5,762.2
then, we add them to get thetotal value of the ending WIP
total ending WIP value 39,334,2
for the transferred out, we add both equivalent cost as this are complete.
And multiply by the whole amount 20,200
trasnferred out: 20,200 x (15.26 + 6.13) = 432.078
The basic Earnings Per Share (EPS) for Wells Fargo for 2015 is $4.57 and for 2014 is $4.54, calculated by subtracting preferred dividends from net income and dividing by average common shares.
The provided figures help us calculate the basic Earnings Per Share (EPS) for Wells Fargo for 2015 and 2014. EPS is computed by taking the net income, subtracting the preferred stock dividends, and then dividing by the average common shares outstanding.
For 2015, the calculation is as follows: ($25,116 million - $1,646 million) / 5,136.5 = $4.57 EPS.
Moreover, for 2014, we find: ($25,279 million - $1,458 million) / 5,237.2 = $4.54 EPS.
These EPS values help shareholders understand how much of a company's profit is attributable to each share of common stock.
#SPJ12
Based on the accrual method, the correct entry for $10,000 worth of services would be a debit to accounts receivable for $10,000 and a credit to Sales revenue for $10,000.
The company has performed a certain service for a customer and hasn't been paid for it. The customer therefore owes the company which makes them an account receivable.
The $10,000 will be considered revenue by the company so they will credit the revenue account. Accounts Receivables are assets so this account will be debited.
Find out more on accounts receivables at brainly.com/question/24871345.
The company should debit (increase) the Accounts Receivable account by $10,000 and credit (increase) the Service Revenue account by $10,000. This follows the accrual method of accounting, in which revenues and expenses are recorded when they are earned and incurred, respectively.
The correct entry to record this transaction, using the accrual method, involves two accounts: Accounts Receivable and Service Revenue. Here is the step-by-step process of recording this transaction.
#SPJ6