Answer:
The correct answer is Less than the estimated costs.
Explanation:
The percentage method completed is an accounting practice used to recognize income in long-term contracts.
When long-term projects (greater than one year) are undertaken, the costs and revenues associated with it are incurred throughout its life.
This accounting method, as its name suggests, allows the company to account for part of the associated income and expenses incurred as the project phases are completed. Thus, the percentage complete method is understood as a method of recognition of recognition of income and expenses that is applied continuously without having to defer income and expenses at the end of the project.
B. inverse (or negative) and is called the law of supply.
C. direct (or positive) and is called the law of human nature.
D. direct (or positive) and is called the law of supply.
Answer:
D. direct (or positive) and is called the law of supply.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, when the price of product is increases, then the quantity supplied of that product would also increases and if the price of product is decreases, then the quantity supplied of that product would also decreases. That means it shows a direct or positive relationship between the price and the quantity supplied keeping other factor constant i.e they do not changed.
Answer:
The answer is: BBQ should report a revenue of $52,640
Explanation:
If BBQ is sure that the State of Kentucky is going to meet the discount threshold, then they should consider the discount when recording their revenue.
revenue = $200 (regular price) x 280 units x 94% (net price after discount)
revenue = $52,640
B. Increases the expected present value of lease cash flows to the owner
C. Does not impact the expected present value of lease cash flows to the owner
D. Causes the expected present value of lease cash flows to equal zero
Answer:
B. Increases the expected present value of lease cash flows to the owner
Explanation:
A lease option gives a right but not the obligation to the renter of the property to buy the said property at today's current market price upon the expiry of lease term.
Lease option is similar to an option contract, the difference being, here instead of securities, leased property serves as the underlying asset and instead of option premium, the renter pays a premium each year in addition to the rental charges.
Lease cash flows refer to the present value of future cash flows which the lessor/owner receives in the form of lease rentals plus the added premium each year.
The more the benefits under lease option clause, the higher the premium charged and thus, more would be the future receipts of owner which would increase the expected present value of lease cash flows to the owner.
B.Maria is more risk-averse than Jennifer because Maria is choosing a bond with lower volatility of its expected return.
C.There is not enough information to tell. In order to decide whether Maria or Jennifer is more risk averse, one will need to compare two bonds with the same expected return and different standard deviations of their expected returns.
Answer: The correct answer is "A.Maria is less risk-averse than Jennifer because Maria is choosing a bond with higher standard deviation.".
Explanation: We can measure the risk according to the standard deviation of its expected return, therefore: Maria is less risk averse because she is willing to take more risk in order to obtain a higher return and Jennifer instead prefers to sacrifice performance in order to be less exposed to risk.
Maria is less risk-averse than Jennifer because she chooses a bond with a higher expected return and a higher standard deviation, indicating a willingness to accept more risk.
This question involves the concepts of expected return and risk associated with investments, particularly bonds. Risk-aversion is the degree to which an investor prefers lower risk when investing. Maria, who prefers a bond with a 7% expected return and a 2% standard deviation, is displaying characteristics of being less risk-averse than Jennifer, who prefers a bond with a 4% expected return and a 1% standard deviation. This is because a higher standard deviation indicates a higher degree of risk, which Maria is willing to accept for the potential of a higher return.
Therefore, the correct answer is A. Maria is less risk-averse than Jennifer because Maria is choosing a bond with higher standard deviation.
#SPJ3
b. $275,000
c. $270,000
d. $286,000