Answer:
kjhfdgf
uigykyjgExplanation:
b.The unit cost if 100,000 units are made per year.
c.The annual profit for this quantity(100,000 units).
Answer:
a. Break Even Profit = Fixed Cost / Contribution Per Unit
Fixed Cost = $1,000,000
Contribution Per Unit = 40 - 21 = $19 Per Unit
Break-even Profit = 1,000,000 / 19 = 52,631.57 Units
b. Unit Cost = $21 Per Unit
Applied Fixed Cost= 1,000,000 / 100,000 = $10 Per Unit
Total Cost = Unit cost + Applied fixed cost = $21 per unit + $10 per unit = $31 Per Unit
c. Annual Profit:
Sales $3,640,000
(60,000 x 40) (40,000 x 31)
Less: Variable Cost $2,100,000
Less: Fixed Cost $1,000,000
Profit $540,000
Answer:
First blank: Consumers
Second blank: GDP
Third blank: CPI
Explanation:
The Consumer Price Index is used to measure the basic basket of services and goods that a normal person often buys in order to have a decent quality of life, the GDP includes all goods and services produced, for example all the office equipment, or farm equipment that was produced by a countries economy, the average customer doesn´t need farm equipment nor office equipment that is why it is not taken into account in the Costumer Price Index.
Inflation is measured using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the GDP deflator. The CPI measures price changes for a specific basket of goods and services bought by the typical consumer, while the GDP deflator considers all domestically produced final goods and services.
Inflation is typically measured using two indices known as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the GDP deflator. The CPI measures the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services. Not all goods and services are included in the CPI, it primarily focuses on those sold to typical urban consumers.
On the other hand, the GDP deflator is a measure of the price of all domestically produced final goods and services in an economy including items like farm equipment, which are not included in the CPI. The GDP deflator takes a broader approach and doesn't restrict itself to a fixed basket of goods and services, rather reflects the current composition of output and the prices of all the goods and services currently produced domestically.
#SPJ12
Answer:
The GDP in 2008 was $6800
Explanation:
The GDP or Gross Dividend Product of the country is the total value of the economic activity or the value of goods and services produced in an economy within a country in a certain year.
The formula to calculate the GDP = C + I + G + ( X - M )
Where,
Thus, GDP = 5000 + 1000 + 900 + ( 100 - 200)
GDP = $6800
Answer:
Part 1. Calculate the total prime cost for last week
Direct materials 28,000
Add Direct labor 28,000
Prime Cost 56,000
Part 2. Calculate the per-unit prime cost
per-unit prime cost=$56,000/5,600
=$10.00
Part 3. Calculate the total conversion cost for last week
Direct labor 28,000
Add Manufacturing Overheads 55,000
Total conversion cost 83,000
Part 4. Calculate the per-unit conversion cost.
per-unit conversion cost=$83,000/5,600
=$14.82
Explanation:
Part 1. Calculate the total prime cost for last week
Prime Cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labor
Part 2. Calculate the per-unit prime cost
Per Unit Prime Cost = total prime cost/number of units manufactured
Part 3. Calculate the total conversion cost for last week
Conversion Cost = Direct Labor + Manufacturing Overheads
Part 4. Calculate the per-unit conversion cost.
Per-unit conversion cost =Total Conversion Cost / number of units manufactured
The total prime cost last week was $56,000, and the per-unit prime cost was $10. The total conversion cost was $83,000, and the per-unit conversion cost was $14.82.
The prime cost is calculated by adding the costs of the direct materials and direct labor. Therefore, the total prime cost for Slapshot Company last week was $28,000 (direct materials) + $28,000 (direct labor) = $56,000.
The per-unit prime cost is calculated by dividing the total prime cost by the number of units produced. Therefore, it is $56,000 ÷ 5,600 hockey sticks = $10 per unit (rounded to the nearest cent).
The conversion cost is calculated by adding the cost of direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Therefore, the total conversion cost last week was $28,000 (direct labor) + $55,000 (overhead) = $83,000.
The per-unit conversion cost is calculated by dividing the total conversion cost by the number of units produced. Therefore, it is $83,000 ÷ 5,600 hockey sticks = <-strong>$14.82 per unit (rounded to the nearest cent).
Labor 1.5 hours @ $15.00 per hour
1. What was Glass Vessel’s flexible budget variance for materials in March? (As part of your answer, please indicate whether this variance was favorable or unfavorable.)
2. What was Glass Vessel’s labor efficiency/usage variance for March? (As part of your answer, indicate whether this variance was favorable or unfavorable.)
Must show work
Answer:
(i) -62.5 (Unfavorable)
(ii) -450 (Unfavorable).
Explanation:
(1) Material variance:
Material cost variance is the difference between standard cost for actual output produced and the actual cost of materials.
Material cost variance = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
Where SQ = Standard quantity for actual output, AQ = Actual quantity, SP = Standard Price and AP = Actual price.
This material cost variance can be subdivided into material price variance and material usage variance.
Material price variance = AQ × (SP – AP)
Material usage variance = SP (SQ - AQ)
In the problem, it is given that materials 2 pounds @ 1.25 per pound.
Therefore, SP = $1.25 and SQ per unit = 2 pounds.
It is given that Glass vessel produced 300 vases using 650 pounds of material.
Therefore, AQ = 650 pounds and actual output = 300 vases.
Therefore SQ for actual output:
= (SQ per unit) × (Actual output)
= (2 pounds) × (300 vases)
= 600 pounds.
It is given that Glass vessel purchased 650 pounds of material for $845.
Therefore Actual price = $845 ÷ 650 pounds
= $ 1.3
SP = $1.25 and AP = $1.3
SQ = 600 pounds and AQ = 650 pounds.
Material cost variance = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
Material price variance = AQ × (SP – AP)
Material usage variance = SP × (SQ-AQ)
Material cost variance (MCV):
= (600 × 1.25) – (650 × 1.3)
= -95 (Unfavorable)
Material price variance (MPV):
= 650 × (1.25 – 1.3)
= -32.5 (Unfavorable)
Material usage variance (MUV):
= 1.25 (600-650)
= -62.5 (Unfavorable)
Verification:
MCV = MPV + MUV
= (-32.5) + (-62.5)
= -95.
(2) Labor variances:
Labor cost variance is the difference between standard labor cost and the actual cost.
Labor cost variance = (SH × SR) – (AH × AR)
Where SH = Standard hours for actual output, AH = Actual hours, SR = Standard rate and AR = Actual rate.
Labor cost variance can be subdivided into Labor rate variance and Labor efficiency variance.
Labor rate variance = AH × (SR-AR)
Labor efficiency variance = SR × (SH – AH)
It is given that Labor 1.5 hours @ $15 per hour is the standard.
Therefore, SR = $15 and SH per unit = 1.5 hours.
SH for actual output = SH per unit × actual output
= 1.5 × 300
= 450 hours.
It is given that the actual total labor costs for March were $7200, which entailed 480 hours of labor.
Therefore, AH = 480 hours.
AR = Labor cost ÷ labor hours
= 7,200 ÷ 480
= $15.
SH = 450 hours, AH = 480 hours, SR = $15 and AR = $15.
Here, standard rate and actual rate are same. Therefore the labor rate variance is NIL. So the entire labor variance will come under labor efficiency variance.
Labor cost variance = (SH × SR) – (AH × AR)
Labor rate variance = AH × (SR-AR)
Labor efficiency variance = SR × (SH – AH)
Labor cost variance = (450 × 15) – (480 × 15)
= -450 (Unfavorable)
Labor rate variance = 480 × (15-15)
= 0
Labor efficiency variance = 15 × (450 - 480)
= -450 (Unfavorable).
Answer:
80
Explanation:
According to the given situation, the computation of n is shown below:-
EXP[27.72δ]=2
δ =0.025
m = 1 ÷ 2
(1 + 0.025 ÷ (1 ÷ 2))^n ÷ 2 = 7.04
n ÷ 2 × ln(1.05)=ln(7.04)
n ÷ 2=40
n = 80
Therefore for computing the n we simply applied the above formula i.e. by considering all the information given in the question
Hence,the n is 80
To find the number of years it takes for an investment of $1 to increase to $7.04 at a nominal rate of interest numerically equal to δ and convertible once every two years, we can use the formula A = P(1 + r/m)^mt. Using this formula, we can solve for t by substituting the given values into the equation and solving for t using logarithms.
To find n, the number of years it takes for an investment of $1 to increase to $7.04 at a nominal rate of interest numerically equal to δ and convertible once every two years, we can use the formula:
A = P(1 + r/m)mt
Where A is the final amount, P is the initial investment, r is the nominal rate of interest, m is the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.
In this case, A = $7.04, P = $1, r = δ, and m = 2 (since it is convertible once every two years). Using this information, we can solve for t:
$7.04 = $1(1 + δ/2)2t
Divide both sides by $1:
7.04 = (1 + δ/2)2t
Take the logarithm of both sides:
log(7.04) = log((1 + δ/2)2t)
Apply the power rule of logarithms:
log(7.04) = 2t * log(1 + δ/2)
Divide both sides by 2 * log(1 + δ/2):
t = log(7.04) / (2 * log(1 + δ/2))
Plug in the value of δ to find the value of t.
Learn more investment here:
#SPJ3