Answer:
The demand location where demand is unmet is equal to Cleveland. Received only 75 units. 100 units demand is unmet.
Explanation:
Solution
From the example given, we solve for which demand location will have an unmet demand
Now,
The maximum quantity that can be shipped from Allentown to Erie is 100.
The Maximum quantity that can be shipped from Harrisburg to Cleveland is 175
While,
The Maximum quantity that can be shipped from Harrisburg to Dayton is 175
Hence, in case we want an solution optimum to get the required demand as many as possible with the supply given and with a low costs, then we need to find the optimum solution.
By applying a least cost method called greedy, we need to remove our least costing node and then provide minimum of demand and supply unit a present to each cell.
Thus,
The first least cost is Allentown to Dayton.
From Allentown to Dayton 100 units. Next least cost is Philadelphia to Erie.
From Philadelphia to Erie 150 units. Next least cost is Harrisburg to Erie.
From Harrisburg to Erie 25 units. Next least cost is Harrisburg to Dayton.
From Harrisburg to Dayton 75 units. Next least cost is Harrisburg to Cleveland
From Harrisburg to Cleveland 75 units.
So, for the optimum solution, the right choice of answer will be
From Allentown to Erie = 0 units
From Harrisburg to Cleveland = 75 units
From Harrisburg to Dayton = 75 units
Therefore, The demand location where demand is unmet is equal to Cleveland. Received only 75 units. 100 units demand is unmet.
The maximum shipment from Allentown to Erie is 100 units, from Harrisburg to Cleveland is 175 units, and from Harrisburg to Dayton is 75 units. After these shipments, no location has unmet demand.
The problem at hand relates to the Intuitive Least Cost Method which is a method used in the field of operations research for solving transportation problems. The methodology seeks to minimize the total transport cost while meeting the demand and supply constraints at various sites.
From the provided matrix, the maximum quantity that can be shipped from Allentown to Erie is 100 units as indicated by the supply limit of Allentown. Similarly, Harrisburg can ship a maximum of 175 units to Cleveland and 75 units to Dayton, since after fulfilling the Cleveland demand, 75 units remain for Dayton. Finally, observing the demand, we see that Cleveland will still require 175 - 175 = 0 units, Dayton 175 - 100 = 75 units and Erie 175 - 100 = 75 units. Therefore, no location remains with unmet demand.
#SPJ3
Answer:
c. $87,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Arthur's basis in the partnership interest at the end of the year is shown below:
= His share of partnership liabilities + net operating income share + increased share in liabilities - distributed amount
= $60,000 + $12,000 + $20,000 - $5,000
= $87,000
Net operating income share is
= $40,000 × 30%
= $12,000
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
En términos generales, reducir la jornada laboral del trabajador reduce su sueldo o remuneración, ya que las empresas pagan a los trabajadores un salario acorde no sólo a su nivel de productividad, sino que también a la cantidad de tiempo que laboran.
Aunque es posible que en ciertas formas contractuales dicha reducción horaria no repercuta en el sueldo, o también puede suceder que el trabajador realmente sea más productivo trabajando menos, lo cual hasta podría hacer que su salario aumente, dependiendo del contexto.
Answer:
$5,600
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Number of units of inventory sold = 400 units
Selling cost of the inventory = $40 each
Original cost of the inventory = $26 each
Now,
Total inventory cost of the units sold = 400 × $26
= $10,400
Total selling cost of the inventory sold = 400 × $40
= $16,000
Therefore,
Elenor’s gross profit on this transaction
= Total selling cost of the inventory sold - Total inventory cost of the units sold
= $16,000 - $10,400
= $5,600
Elenor's gross profit is calculated by subtracting the total cost of inventory from the total sales revenue. With 400 units sold at $40 each and a cost of $26 each, the gross profit is $5,600.
To calculate Elenor's gross profit on the transaction, we need to deduct the total cost of the inventory from the total sales revenue. First, we calculate the total sales revenue: 400 units sold at $40 each gives us $16,000. Next, we calculate the total cost of the inventory: 400 units purchased at $26 each costs Elenor $10,400.
Now, to find the gross profit, we subtract the total cost from the sales revenue: $16,000 - $10,400 = $5,600.
Therefore, Elenor's gross profit on this transaction is $5,600.
#SPJ3
January 325 5,900
February 375 6,200
March 300 5,650
April 350 5,450
May 275 5,550
June 450 6,250
Using the high-low method, calculate the total fixed cost per month and the variable cost per tanning appointment. (Round your "Variable Cost per Unit" answer to 2 decimal places and "Fixed Cost" answer to the nearest dollar amount.)
Answer:
C = 6.5Q + 3,762.5
Explanation:
High-low method:
We subtract the high from the low:
The difference tell us that 100 untis generate 650 additional cost
So we can calcualte the variable cost:
cost 650 / Unis 100 = variable cost 6.5
Now on low or high we solve for fixed cost:
cost = 6.5 x 375 + fixed cost
Total Cost 6200
Variable 2437.5
Fixed Cost 3762.5
cost = 6.5 x 275 + fixed cost
Total Cost 5550
Variable 1787.5
Fixed Cost 3762.5
the formula will be:
C = 6.5Q + 3,762.5
Answer:
Equivalent units for conversion cost is 10,790 units
Explanation:
Completed and Transferred (1,030 + 10,000 - 400) x 100 % = 10,630
Ending Work In Process 400 x 40% = 160
Total equivalent units for conversion cost = 10,790
Answer:
$2 million or $2,000,000
Explanation:
The computation of the revenue and gross profit or loss will appear in the company’s income statement in the first year is shown below:
= revenue recognized - cost incurred
The Total cost is
= $6 + $9
= $15
And, the revenue recognized is
= $6 ÷ $15 × $20
= $8
So, the gross profit is
= $8 - $6
= $2
hence, the gross profit is $2 million