Answer: Option (2) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Atomic number of oxygen atom is 8 and its electronic distribution is 2, 6. So, it contains only 2 orbitals which are closer to the nucleus of the atom.
As a result, the valence electrons are pulled closer by the nucleus of oxygen atom due to which there occurs a decrease in atomic size of the atom.
Whereas atomic number of sulfur is 16 and its electronic distribution is 2, 8, 6. As there are more number of orbitals present in a sulfur atom so, the valence electrons are away from the nucleus of the atom.
Hence, there is less force of attraction between nucleus of sulfur atom and its valence electrons due to which size of sulfur atom is larger than the size of oxygen atom.
Thus, we can conclude that the oxygen atom is smaller than the sulfur atom because the outer orbitals of oxygen are located closer to the nucleus than those of sulfur.
The oxygen atom is smaller than the sulfur atom because the outer orbitals of oxygen are located closer to the nucleus than those of sulfur.
The correct option is (2) the outer orbitals of oxygen are located closer to the nucleus than those of sulfur.
To understand why the oxygen atom is smaller than the sulfur atom, we need to consider their electron configurations. Oxygen has 8 electrons and sulfur has 16 electrons. Oxygen's electron configuration is 1s²2s²2p⁴, while sulfur's electron configuration is 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁴.
The outer orbitals of an atom, which are the valence orbitals, are the ones involved in bonding. The electrons in these orbitals determine the size of the atom. In the case of oxygen and sulfur, the outer orbitals of oxygen (2p orbitals) are closer to the nucleus compared to sulfur's outer orbitals (3p orbitals). As a result, the oxygen atom is smaller than the sulfur atom.
#SPJ3
Answer:
H20
Explanation:
peroxide would also eat bacteria along with the water
The primary intermolecular forces which act between a molecule of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and an iron(III) cation (Fe3+) are ion-dipole attractions. These arise due to the polar nature of the H2O2 molecule and the charged state of the Fe3+ ion.
The kind of intermolecular forces that act between a hydrogen peroxide molecule and an iron(III) cation chiefly involve ion-dipole attractions, which are a type of intermolecular force. This occurs due to the polar nature of the hydrogen peroxide molecule (H2O2) and the charged iron(III) ion (Fe3+).
The O-H bonds in the hydrogen peroxide molecule are polar as oxygen exhibits a higher electronegativity than hydrogen, meaning that it has a tendency to draw electrons closer to itself. This results in a dipole with partial negative charge residing at the oxygen end of the molecule, and a partial positive charge at the hydrogen end. Meanwhile, the iron(III) ion has a positive charge. This makes for a strong ion-dipole interaction between the two.
It's important to remember that intermolecular forces are the attractions between molecules which are crucial to their physical properties, while intramolecular forces are those that keep a single molecule intact. Further, although the term 'hydrogen bond' may suggest a bond between hydrogen and other atoms, it is, in fact, an intermolecular attraction force which is stronger than others like dipole-dipole attractions and dispersion forces.
#SPJ2
Answer: iron atoms
Explanation:
According to avogadro's law, 1 mole of every substance weighs equal to the molecular mass and contains avogadro's number of particles.
contains= 2 atoms of iron
contains= atoms of iron
thus 0.32 moles of contains= atoms of iron
Thus the sample would have iron atoms.
b. 26.0 g H2SO4 in 200.0 mL solution
c. 15.0 g NaCl dissolved to make 420.0 mL solution
Answer:
a) NaHCO3 = 0.504 M
b) H2SO4 = 1.325 M
c) NaCl = 0.610 M
Explanation:
Step 1: Data given
Moles = mass / molar mass
Molarity = moles / volume
a. 19.5 g NaHCO3 in 460.0 ml solution
Step 1: Data given
Mass NaHCO3 = 19.5 grams
Volume = 460.0 mL = 0.460 L
Molar mass NaHCO3 = 84.0 g/mol
Step 2: Calculate moles NaHCO3
Moles NaHCO3 = 19.5 grams / 84.0 g/mol
Moles NaHCO3 = 0.232 moles
Step 3: Calculate molarity
Molarity = 0.232 moles / 0.460 L
Molarity = 0.504 M
b. 26.0 g H2SO4 in 200.0 mL solution
Step 1: Data given
Mass H2SO4 = 26.0 grams
Volume = 200.0 mL = 0.200 L
Molar mass H2SO4 = 98.08 g/mol
Step 2: Calculate moles H2SO4
Moles H2SO4 = 26.0 grams / 98.08 g/mol
Moles H2SO4 = 0.265 moles
Step 3: Calculate molarity
Molarity = 0.265 moles / 0.200 L
Molarity =1.325 M
c. 15.0 g NaCl dissolved to make 420.0 mL solution
Step 1: Data given
Mass NaCl = 15.0 grams
Volume = 420.0 mL = 0.420 L
Molar mass NaCl = 58.44 g/mol
Step 2: Calculate moles NaCl
Moles NaCl = 15.0 grams / 58.44 g/mol
Moles NaCl = 0.256 moles
Step 3: Calculate molarity
Molarity = 0.256 moles / 0.420 L
Molarity =0.610 M
Answer:
Molarity= 4M
Explanation:
n= CV
24= C×6,
C= 24/6 = 4M
Answer:4M
Explanation:
Number of moles=24
Volume=6L
Molarity=number of moles ➗ volume
Molarity=24 ➗ 6
Molarity=4M
Answer:
3grams
Explanation:
The reaction for the production of Magnesium dioxide will be
Mg + O2 → MgO
we have 5g of MgO (molar mass 40g)
no of moles of MgO = 5/40 = 0.125
Using unitary method we have
1 mole of Mg require 1 mole of MgO
0.125 Mole of MgO = 0.125mole of Mg
n = given mass /molar mass
0.125 = mass / molar mass
mass = 0.125* 24 = 3grams
To produce 5 grams of magnesium oxide, you would theoretically need approximately 3.013 grams of magnesium, based on the mole ratio and molecular weights of magnesium and magnesium oxide.
To calculate the amount of magnesium needed to produce magnesium oxide, we first need to understand the balanced chemical equation for the reaction: Mg + 1/2O2 → MgO. This equation shows that a mole of magnesium (24.31 g) reacts with half a mole of oxygen (8 g) to produce a mole of magnesium oxide (40.31 g). Therefore, if we want to produce 5g of magnesium oxide, we'll need: (5 g MgO * 24.31 g Mg) / 40.31 g MgO = 3.013 g Mg, approximately which is the theoretical amount of magnesium needed.
#SPJ11
Answer:
The glass cup falling from the counter
Explanation:
the glass isn't changing in any chemical way. it's still made of the same material, just broken apart.
Physical changes involve the alteration of the state or appearance of matter, without changing the composition. An example is solid wax turning into liquid wax when heated, or steam condensing inside a cooking pot.
The question asks for an example of a physical change. Physical changes involve alterations in the state or appearance of matter, without changing its composition. For example, solid wax turning into liquid wax when heated is a physical change. The wax is still the same substance, it's just in a different state. Similarly, steam condensing inside a cooking pot is also a physical change. The water vapor turns back into liquid water, but it's still water. These are distinguished from chemical changes, which transform one substance into a different substance.
#SPJ2