Answer:
The additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 was 8.5% (to the nearest tenth of a percent)
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Let's review the information provided to us to answer the question correctly:
Female bank tellers median earnings in 1969 = US$ 4,190
Male bank tellers median earnings in 1969 = US$ 3,860
2. How much more did female bank tellers earn than male bank tellers as a percentage of male bank teller median earnings in 1969 (to the nearest tenth of a percent)?
For answering the question we will use the following formula:
Additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 = Female bank tellers median earnings in 1969/Male bank tellers median earnings in 1969 - 1
Replacing with the real values, we have:
Additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 = 4,190/3,860 - 1
Additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 = 1.085 - 1
Additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 = 0.085 = 8.5%
The additional percent that a median female bank teller earn than a median male bank teller in 1969 was 8.5%
B. More than seven alarms are triggered.
C. Eight or fewer alarms are triggered.
Answer:
a)
And replacing we got:
b)
And adding we got:
c)
And replacing we got:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X the random variable of interest "numebr of times that an alarm is triggered", on this case we now that:
The probability mass function for the Binomial distribution is given as:
Where (nCx) means combinatory and it's given by this formula:
Part a
We want to find this probability:
And replacing we got:
Part b
And adding we got:
Part c
And replacing we got:
Since, it is an exponential function, thus this is a compound interest problem;
Where; the function is given as;
Thus, the function required is;
After 5 years,
The amount in the savings account after five years is $475.07
If ZY = 2x + 3 and WX = x+4, find WX.
Your answer will be so appreciated.
Answer:
We conclude that the population mean is not equal to 17.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 17
Sample mean, = 14.12
Sample size, n = 40
Alpha, α = 0.05
Population standard deviation, σ = 4
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
We use Two-tailed z test to perform this hypothesis.
a) Formula:
Putting all the values, we have
b) P-value can be calculated from the standard z-table.
P-value = 0.0000
c) Since the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, the population mean is not equal to 17
d) Now,
e) Rejection Rule:
We reject the null hypothesis if it is less than lower critical value and greater than the upper critical value
If the z-statistic lies outside the acceptance region which is from -1.96 to +1.96, we reject the null hypothesis.
f) Since the calculated z-stat lies outside the acceptance region, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, the population mean is not equal to 17.
The test statistic is -1.78 and the p-value is 0.0761, indicating that we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the population mean is not equal to 17.
The test statistic can be calculated using the formula:
test statistic = (sample mean - population mean) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))
Plugging in the given values, we get:
test statistic = (14.12 - 17) / (4 / sqrt(40))
Calculating this gives us a test statistic value of -1.78.
The p-value can be calculated using the test statistic. We need to find the probability that a test statistic at least as extreme as -1.78 would occur assuming the null hypothesis is true. Using a standard normal distribution table or software, we find the p-value to be approximately 0.0761.
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level (alpha = 0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we can conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the population mean is not equal to 17.
#SPJ11
Answer:the last one
Step-by-step explanation:
Select ALL OF THE correct answers.
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
You may solve this problem in two ways:
If you solve the inequality explicitly (divide both sides by 4), you get
So, if has to be stricktly less than 4, you can only choose 1, 2 and 3 as answers.
Alternatively, you can plug in all of the values you're proposed and check if the inequality holds:
If , you have , which is true.
If , you have , which is true.
If , you have , which is true.
If , you have , which is false.
So, again, only 1, 2 and 3 are solutions.