Answer:
$20,000
Explanation:
Bond discount at the issuance of bond:
= Worth of Bonds issued - [(Worth of Bonds issued ÷ 100) × Issue price]
= 705,000 - [($705,000 ÷ 100) × 98]
= $705,000 - $690,900
= $14,100
Bond Payable = $705,000
Unamortized bond discount:
= Bond discount at the issuance of bond - Amortized amount
= $14,100 - $8,200
= $5,900
Redemption Value of Bond = Retired price of bonds × 7,050
= 102 × 7,050
= $719,100
Loss on retirement on Bond:
= Redemption Value of Bond - (Worth of Bonds issued - Unamortized bond discount)
= 719,100 - (705,000 - 5,900)
= 719,100 - 699,100
= $20,000
When Washington Inc. retired the bonds, they would report a gain of $19,300.
When Washington Inc. retired the bonds on January 1, 2017, the gain or loss that they would report can be calculated as follows:
If the cash received is higher than the carrying value, there is a gain. If the cash received is lower than the carrying value, there is a loss.
In this case, Washington Inc. retired the bonds at 102, which means they received $716,100. Since $716,100 is higher than the carrying value ($696,800), Washington Inc. would report a gain of $716,100 - $696,800 = $19,300 for the retirement of the bond.
#SPJ3
Answer:
1. $67,500
2. $69,500
3. $69,500
Explanation:
1. The computation of bad debt expense is shown below:-
Bad debt expense = Credit sales × Debt percentage
= $4,500,000 × 1.5%
= $67,500
2. The computation of receivable written off is shown below:-
receivable written off = Allowance Beginning balance + bad debt expense - Allowance ending balance
= $42,000 + $67,500 - $40,000
= $69,500
3. The computation of bad debt expense be for 2013 is shown below:-
= receivable written off
= $69,500
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the sales price increase and because the variable cost are the same the contribution margin will increase, which lead to think the BEP is lower.
But, because the fixed cost also increase we cannot determinate where the new BEP Will be higher or lower. The fixed cost could increase so much that nulifies the increase in the contribution margin or even be higher enought that the BEP goes higher.
So Option A is the only true statment.
The question asks to identify a problem in the liabilities section of a balance sheet, specifically in the payroll information, and suggest a solution. Possible issues could be inaccurate payroll calculations or inconsistencies between records. A possible solution could be auditing the payroll and implementing regular checks.
The question asks you to review the liabilities section of the balance sheet for a company named Rings and Things with a focus on the payroll information. It's important to note that without specific details from the balance sheet and payroll information, a precise issue can't be identified. However, typical problems in this area could include inaccurate payroll calculations or discrepancies between the balance sheet and payroll records.
A solution to these issues could involve auditing the payroll procedures to identify and rectify any errors or inconsistencies. Furthermore, regular checks and audits could be implemented to prevent these types of issues from occurring in the future. It’s fundamental that Janet and Omar ensure all records are meticulous and accurate to maintain a healthy balance sheet.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
Most of the liability costs are coming from payroll, the individual salesperson. This employee only worked for 20 hours during April, and yet still makes an income of $1000 dollars. This means they have an hourly rate of $50 an hour, which is way more than the standard employee should be making. I would recommend Janet and Omar to decrease the hourly rate to something more standard, like minimum wage. This would decrease their liability costs by more than 50% because California's minimum wage rate is only about $12-13.
Answer:
$66,000
Explanation:
The computation of the total implicit cost per year is shown below:
= Given up salary + investment amount × interest rate on investment in the economy
= $60,000 + $100,000 × 6%
= $60,000 + $6,000
= $66,000
We simply added the given up salary and investment amount after considering the interest rate on investment so that the accurate amount could come
Answer:
C = 1.75Q + 4,990
variable 1.75
fixed component 4,990
Explanation:
High-Low method:
we subtract the highest level of activity with the lowest one:
24,398 units generates 42,696 cost
with this information we can solve for variable cost.
42,696 / 24,398 = 1.75
Now we calcualte the fixed cost:
TC = variable x Q + fixed cost
82,620 = 1.75 (44,360) + fixed cost
82,620 - 77630 = 4990
the formula will be:
C = 1.75Q + 4,990
Answer: variable 1.75
fixed component 4,990
Explanation: subtract the highest level of activity from the lowest one
44,360-19,962=24,398
82,620-39,924=42,696
then do 42,696 / 24,398 = 1.75
Now for fixed cost:
82,620 = 1.75 (44,360)
82,620 - 77630 = 4990