Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation:
i just took the quiz
b. Separate Greek city states developed instead of a single state
c. Greek citizens had to rely on slaves to farm and herd livestock
d. Greece did not develop a maritime tradition of ships and sailing
I think the answer is b but i am not to sure
The influence of Greek city-states being developed instead of a single state was played by geography in the development of the Greek society. Therefore, the option B holds true.
Greek city-states are known for the unique and uncommon rule and administration that was relevant in its society during the past. The proposition of separate governance became a defining characteristic of the Greek society ever since its inception.
The reason behind the formation and governance of the Greek society under separate city-states was backed by a number of geographical factors. This system later became the biggest influence of Greek society on other parts of the world.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of the Greek city-states.
Learn more about Greek city-states here:
#SPJ2
He spoke to his congregation in a calm, rational way.
He leapt around the stage and heaped abuse on sinners.
He sermonized in a passionate evocative style and booming voice.
He used imagery to instill fear in the hearts of sinners and the unconverted.
Answer:
He sermonized in a passionate booming voice.
Explanation:
Just had it on a test. Hope it helps! :)
B. They believed appeasement could buy them time to increase their own military capabilities.
C. Appeasement meant they had the power to dictate whether the Soviet Union and Italy gained any power in the annexed territories.
D. The leaders thought that a policy of appeasement would deter other countries from taking aggressive actions in Europe.
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
Like many farmers and laborers, I likely would support the changes that Chávez brought about because they helped Venezuela’s poor. As president, Chávez introduced education, healthcare, and labor initiatives to improve the quality of life for the lower classes of Venezuela.
Explanation:a
direct democracy
consent of the governed
representative democracy