The anti-slavery reformations and temperance movements were the two key reformations that gave rise to the women's suffrage movement. Hence, option B holds true regarding women's suffrage movement.
The Women's suffrage movements were a movement started by women, particularly in the western part of the world. Women demanded an equal right to vote by the virtue of these movements in the society.
The abolition of slavery due to anti-slavery reformations and movements like the one of temperance made the women in the western society realize that they deserve an equal representation in the functioning of the social and political functions of the society.
Hence, option B holds true regarding the women's suffrage movement.
Learn more about the women's suffrage movement here:
#SPJ5
The Montgomery Bus Boycott proved that nonviolent resistance could be a powerful tool for challenging and overturning racial segregation and discrimination in society.
Segregation refers to the enforced separation of different racial or ethnic groups, often with the intention of maintaining social, economic, and political inequalities.
In the context of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, segregation specifically refers to the practice of racial separation on public buses, where African Americans were subjected to discriminatory policies, such as being forced to sit in the back or give up their seats to white passengers.
The boycott was a response to this systemic segregation, and its success highlighted the injustice of segregation laws and paved the way for subsequent civil rights advancements in the United States.
Learn more about racial Segregation here:
#SPJ6
b)state courts try cases between citizens of a state, while federal courts try disputes between states.
c)state courts consider the facts and law in making a decision, while federal courts consider the law, facts, and precedents.
d)state courts consider the facts and precedents in a decision, while federal courts consider the law, facts, and precedents
Answering the question, the main difference between state and federal courts is that state courts are authorized to try cases between citizens of a state, while federal courts try disputes between states. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
The main difference between the state and the federal courts is that the states are empowered under the law to hear cases that have to do with the laws and citizens of their state. The federal courts are authorized to entertain cases or lawsuits between citizens of different states, to decide lawsuits against the United States and are also empowered to hear cases that have to do with certain federal laws.
The state courts are authorized to hear cases based on the law passed by their legislature, they are also empowered to entertain family law cases, contract disputes and cases concerning traffic violations.
However, the federal courts can hear cases if the United States is involved, the courts are authorized to hear cases involving the violation of the US constitution and can also entertain cases if it involves citizens of different states and foreign citizens. The federal courts also have the power to hear cases of bankruptcy and copyright.
Therefore, the main difference between state and federal courts is that state courts try cases between citizens of a state, while federal courts try disputes between states.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
The key difference between state and federal courts lies in the types of cases they handle. State courts generally try cases concerning state laws and constitutions, while federal courts try cases based on federal laws and conflicts between states.
The primary distinction between state and federal courts pertains to the types of cases they handle. The correct answer to your question is b) state courts try cases between citizens of a state, while federal courts try disputes between states. State courts typically handle cases related to state laws and constitutions, such as most criminal cases, probate and family law, and contract disputes. Meanwhile, federal courts try cases involving federal laws, including constitutional law, bankruptcy, federal crimes, and in some cases, cases that involve parties from different states (known as diversity jurisdiction).
#SPJ6
b. Impressment.
c. Hijacking.
d. Impeachment.
The fall of the Mayan civilization is due to the overpopulation, environmental degradation, warfare, shifting trade routes and extended drought.
Unlike the Aztecs or Inca, the Maya were never a unified empire, largely because of geography. The dense, thick jungle was simply too great an obstacle for widespread urbanization. The landscape kept the many Maya cities naturally isolated from each other, so each one maintained an independent identity. The rainforest - home to many Maya cities - made crossing land difficult. Geographic features that make travel difficult are called natural barriers. The land of the Maya had many natural barriers.
So we can conclude that: The fall of the Mayan civilization is due to the overpopulation, environmental degradation, warfare, shifting trade routes and extended drought.
Learn more about Mayan here: brainly.com/question/971589
#SPJ1
The physical geography of the area, marked by access to waterways and nutrient-poor tropical soil, shaped the Mayan city-states' economies, which were largely dependent on agriculture. Environmental factors, including climate fluctuations and crop diseases, posed challenges that may have contributed to their decline around 900 CE.
The physical geography significantly affected the development of Mayan city-states' economies. The Mayan city-states were primarily located near resources such as waterways and fertile lands that were conducive to agriculture, particularly the cultivation of maize, squash, beans, and cacao. For instance, major cities were typically built adjacent to large, shallow lakes, as access to water was essential for drinking and irrigation, especially in the lowlands where rainfall was relatively rare. Additionally, the tropical soil found in the region was often nutrient-poor, prompting the Mayans to adopt a slash-and-burn agricultural approach to grow crops for their rapidly expanding urban populations.
Similarly, the growth and expansion of these city-states were also influenced by fluctuations and variations in the climate or consecutive poor harvests caused by crop disease. These environmental challenges posed significant stress on all social classes and may have contributed to disorder, conflict, and possible internal revolts within the city-states. Over time, these environmental issues, combined with other factors such as demographic growth that led to large-scale deforestation and soil erosion, could have played a role in the decline of Mayan civilization around 900 CE.
#SPJ12