Answer: Formal training is an integral part of employee development. It helps employee to get introduced to the nature of the job.
a) It makes clear to the workers what the employer needs, without which workers may not understand which work should be done on priority basis.
b) It eliminates waste of resources like time, money, etc. If a work is done without any formal training, such work might not be in desired standard; this thing is the waste of money as well as time. Therefore, in order to prevent it the formal training is required.
In rudimentary terms, every firm depends on its workforce to a great extent. After all, it is the people that run the operations of the company.
The employer that provide training to their employees see the following benefits:
Greater productivity,better cooperation,continuous growth of employees
and enhanced job satisfaction.
Economy of Economy Stock A Stock B
Recession .20 .010 – .35
Normal .55 .090 .25
Boom .25 .240 .48
a. Calculate the expected return for the two stocks.'
Answer:
11.15%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the expected rate of return is shown below:
Expected rate of return = (Recession probability× Possible Returns ) + (Normal Probability × Possible Returns ) + (Boom Probability × Possible Returns 3)
= (0.20 × 0.010) + (0.55 × 0.090) + (0.25 × 0.240)
= 0.002+ 0.0495 + 0.06
= 11.15%
Simply we multiply the probability with its return so that accurate rate could come.
Answer:
Chair unit cost: $ 49.72
Total cost for 675 chairs: $ 33,561
Explanation:
Direct Materials: $ 14.00
Direct Labor: 1.9 hours x $16 labor cost: $ 30.40
Overhead:
1.9 labor hours x ($ 1.6 variable rate + $ 1.20 fixed rate) = $ 5.32
Total unit cost: $ 49.72
Cost to produce 675 chairs:
675 charis x $ 49.72 per chair = $ 33,561
Answer:
Explanation:
Year Cash flow PV factor@15% PV@15% PV factor@20% PV@20%
0 (675,000) 1.000 (675,000) 1.000 (675,000)
1 195,000 0.870 169,565 0.833 162,500
2 195,000 0.756 147,448 0.694 135,417
3 195,000 0.658 128,216 0.579 112,847
4 195,000 0.572 111,492 0.482 94,039
5 195,000 0.497 96,949 0.402 78,366
6 195,000 0.432 84,304 0.335 65,305
NPV 62,974 (26,526)
IRR = Lower rate + Difference in rates*(NPV at lower rate)/(Lower rate NPV-Higher rate NPV)
= 15% + 5%*(62974/(62974 + 26526)
= 18.52%
Therefore, The IRR on this project is 18.52%
Answer:(a) $8,900
(b) -($4,200)
(c) -($13,100)
(d) -($13,100)
Explanation:
Given that,
Amount invested by shareholders = $230,000
Debt securities purchased for cash = $101,000
Received cash interest on securities = $8,900
unrealized holding loss on these securities = $13,100
(a) Net Income = $8,900(Cash interest received)
(b) Comprehensive Income = Net Income - unrealized holding loss
= $8,900 - $13,100
= -($4,200)
(c) Other Comprehensive Income = unrealized holding loss
= -($13,100)
(d) Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Ending Balance of other comprehensive income = Beginning Balance + During this year
= $0 + (-$13,100)
= -($13,100)
Answer:
No, I do not think justices should be forced to retire.
Explanation:
In order to ensure that the rule of law is maintained and every arm of government and it's institutions has no influences on justices, justices should not be forced to retire, as long as they are of good behavior and conduct.
The question pertains to the argument of whether the tenure of Supreme Court justices in a democracy should be capped or not. The professor's comment implies that long tenure might hinder dynamic legal interpretations in line with evolving societal values. Whether one supports the traditional life appointment system for justices or not depends on personal perspective.
The law professor's statement likely implies that with the evolving socially progressive landscape, having Supreme Court justices serve for 25 years or more could lead to stagnation in legal interpretation and decision making. Whether the current life appointment system for justices should be changed or not is a matter of personal opinion. Supporters of the current system often argue that it preserves judicial independence and protects the court from political pressures. On the other hand, those in favor of imposing retirement ages for justices often cite the need for fresh perspectives and dynamic legal interpretations that align with current societal values.
#SPJ3
Required:
a. Determine the proceeds of the note, assuming that the note carries an interest rate of 6%.
b. Determine the proceeds of the note, assuming that the note is discounted at 6%.
Answer:
A. $100,000
B.$99,000
Explanation:
A. Calculation for Determining the proceeds of the note, assuming that the note carries an interest rate of 6%
Based on the information given the note is not discounted which means the face value is equal to the proceeds of $100,000
Hence,
Face value = Proceeds of $100,000
Therefore the proceeds of the note, assuming that the note carries an interest rate of 6% will be $100,000
b. Calculation for Determining the proceeds of the note, assuming the note is discounted at 6%
First step is to find the discount
Using this formula
Discount = Face value amount x Discount rate x (term of note / 360)
Let plug in the formula
Discount= $100,000 x .06 x 60/360
Discount =$360,000/360
Discount= $1,000
Second step is to calculate for the Proceeds
Calculation for the Proceeds
Using this formula
Proceeds = face amount – discount
Let plug in the formula
Proceeds=$100,000 – $1,000
Proceeds= $99,000
Therefore the proceeds of the note, assuming that the note is discounted at 6% will be $99,000