Answer:
It's 0%
Explanation:
It's 0%
B. An unstable ecological niche leads to various selection pressures, which in turn causes the species to remain in a stage of stasis.
C. A stable ecological niche leads to various selection pressures, which in turn causes species to remain unmodified or in stasis.
I believe that species remain in a stage of stasis because they have completely adapted to the environment they are in and are able to live successfully without any evolutionary changes. The species has all the necessary traits in order to survive.
Answer: A) A stable ecological niche leads to absence of selection pressure, which in turn causes species to remain unmodified or in stasis.
I hope it helps, Regards.
I think the correct answer is A
b. An increase in the population of prey it feeds on
c. A decrease in the biodiversity of the ecosystem
d. An increase in the number of predators that feed on it
Answer: b. An increase in the population of prey it feeds on.
Explanation:
A predator is a kind of organism which kills the other organisms so as to obtain them as food. The organism which is killed is called as prey. If the population of predators in an ecosystem increases the result for this increase is the increase in population of prey which the predator population can use as food to survive, reproduce and grow in number.
Answer: b. An increase in the population of prey it feeds on.
Explanation:
A predator is a kind of organism which kills the other organisms so as to obtain them as food. The organism which is killed is called as prey. If the population of predators in an ecosystem increases the result for this increase is the increase in population of prey which the predator population can use as food to survive, reproduce and grow in number.
Differences between the way men and women speak are largely culturally determined, though early research suggested they were due to societal socialization. Modern research indicates the impact of linguistic determinism - the way one's languages can influence one's thoughts and perceptions. Importantly, these gendered speech patterns are not a universal biological fact, but vary across different cultures.
Various factors, predominantly cultural and social, contribute to the differences between men's and women's speech. Early research theories such as those from Robin Lakoff suggested that societal socialization resulted in women's speech being seen as uncertain, excessively polite, and full of hedges. Likewise, Deborah Tannen argued that men and women communicate differently, with men focusing more on status and women on building connections through conversation.
However, more recent studies argue against this concrete division. Janet Hyde, challenging traditional gender role-based speech patterns, conducted a comprehensive analysis which showed minimal differences in verbal skills between boys and girls. Similarly, language research on cultural aspects from Madagascar and New Guinea reveal that speech patterns associated with gender are indeed culturally relative.
Another relevant factor is the role of linguistic determinism, which suggests that the language one speaks can significantly influence one’s thoughts and perceptions. This idea was demonstrated in Lera Boroditsky's research, that native German and Spanish speakers, in which nouns are gendered, describe things differently depending on the noun's gender in their language, even when communicating in a gender-neutral language such as English.
In conclusion, while there may be some observable differences in the way men and women speak, gendered speech patterns are largely cultural and vary significantly across different societies, and they cannot be generalized or naturalized as biological phenomena.
#SPJ11