Answer: 5/7
Step-by-step explanation: 5x3 = 15 and 3x7=21 , if u simplify it equals to 0.7143 and that is 5/7
The numbers 8 and 400 have different orders of magnitude. They also possess a ratio relationship, with 400 being 50 times bigger than 8. While not directly related through square and square root, both numbers share these relationships with other numbers.
The relationship between the values 8 and 400 can be understood through the concept of order of magnitude in mathematics. The order of magnitude is a rough measure of the size of a number, typically based on powers of 10.
An important factor in analyzing this relationship is understanding the concept of ratio and interval level data. Unlike interval level data, the ratio between the numbers, in this case 8 and 400, carries meaningful information in a ratio scale data. In this case, 400 is 50 times bigger than 8.
Another mathematical relationship between 8 and 400 is square and square root, since 400 is the square of 20, and 8 is the square root of 64. So, although there is no direct square or square root relationship between 8 and 400, they share these relationships with other numbers.
#SPJ2
Answer:
They both come in the 8 times table.
ATM withdrawal fee
outstanding deposit
interest earned
NSF fee
When comparing a check register balance with a bank statement, you should subtract the ATM withdrawal fee and NSF fee, but not the interest earned.
Line through (5, -6)
Answer:
y = -2x + 4
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a line has a slope (m) of -2 and passes through (5, -6).
We want to write the equation of the line.
There are three ways to write the equation of the line:
Any of these forms will work, however let's put it into slope-intercept form as that is the most common way.
As we are already given the slope, we can immediately plug that into the equation.
Substitute m with -2.
y = -2x + b
Now, we need to solve for b.
As the equation passes through (5, -6), we can use its values to help solve for b.
Substitute 5 as x and -6 as y.
-6 = -2(5) + b
Multiply.
-6 = -10 + b
Add 10 to both sides.
4 = b
Substitute 4 as b.
y = -2x + 4
0riginal break even point:
285000/ 60/35 = $166,250
New break even point = new fixed costs / ( selling price - variable cost/ selling price)
New break even point = 285,000 + 15,900. / ( 60-( 35-4.50)/60
300,900 / 60-30.50/60 = $612,000
The new break even point increases.
With the new machine, Kent Co.'s break-even point in units would decrease, from 11,400 to 10,200 units. Despite increasing fixed costs, the new machine drives down variable costs, effectively lowering the total number of units needed to cover costs.
The concept under consideration here is the break-even point calculation in unit terms. The break-even point (units) is calculated by dividing the total fixed costs by the contribution margin per unit, which is sales price per unit minus variable cost per unit.
Currently, Kent Co.'s break-even point can be found using its original costs:
If Kent were to purchase the new machine, its costs would alter as follows:
Thus, purchasing the new machine would in fact lower Kent Co.'s break-even point to 10,200 units, thereby improving its cost efficiency.
#SPJ3