Answer:
The South had a representative democracy were the people on a town send a Representative to represent their opinion on the matters of the colonies.
Explanation:
C) the extent to which the seperation of powers was allowed
D) wheatherlaws had been broken during the watergate incident
Answer:
C) the extent to which the separation of powers was allowed
Explanation:
The United States v. Nixon was a case in which Richard Nixon (The President at the time) was accused of being involved in the Watergate Scandal (1972). In the Court, the Supreme Court ordered him to deliver the unedited tape recordings and documents related to such event. However, Nixon refused to do so, claiming his "Executive Privilege", that is to say, his right as President to withhold information from other government branches to preserve confidential communications within the executive branch or to secure the national interest.
The constitutional issue at the heart of the case was the extent or scope of the powers of the executive and the judicial. Did the President have the power to withhold information and not show it to the other branches, and until what point? And did the Judicial have the power to order him to deliver such "confidential" documents?
At the end of the case, the result did not favor the President as the Court determined that the executive privilege had limits and it wasn't immune from judicial review, regarding the demands of due process of law, and he had to show the evidence.
No allies were willing to help.
The United States had started a war without provocation from another country.
The economy was not strong enough to support a war in the Middle East.
Answer:
"The United States had started a war without provocation from another country."
Explanation:
The world demonstrations against the invasion of Iraq in 2003 were a series of protests called and coordinated worldwide against the imminent invasion of Iraq by the United States and its allies, being the first calls of a truly global character in history.
These massive demonstrations were organized mainly by anti-war and anti-war organizations, many of which had already opposed the invasion of Afghanistan years ago. In some Arab countries, the demonstrations were organized by the State; However, Europe witnessed the largest demonstrations, including the three million people who marched through Rome, the capital of Italy, against the war, a manifestation that entered the Guinness Book of Records as the largest anti-war demonstration in history.
In the United States, pro-war protesters often described opponents of war as "a minority"; A Gallup poll on September 14, 2007 showed that "since the summer of 2005, opponents of the war outnumber their supporters. Most Americans believe that the war was a mistake. " In Europe, surveys of the time showed that between 75 and 90% of the continent's population opposed war. Local circumstances allowed the effects of the protests to endure over time, especially in the United Kingdom, the United States, Spain and Italy. In spite of everything, the alliance initiated the invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
B. wars and mutual assured destruction.
C. deterrence and mutual assured destruction
D. deterrence and covert operations.
McFadden Act of 1927
Banking Act of 1933
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
Answer:
Here are summaries of the impact of each of the mentioned banking acts:
Federal Reserve Act of 1913: The Federal Reserve Act established the Federal Reserve System, which serves as the central bank of the United States. Its impact includes providing a more stable and flexible monetary system, acting as a lender of last resort during financial crises, and regulating the money supply to promote economic stability.
McFadden Act of 1927: The McFadden Act sought to strengthen the regulation of banks by granting states more control over branch banking and limiting the ability of national banks to branch across state lines. Its impact was to maintain state-level control over banking activities and reduce the competitive advantage of national banks.
Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall Act): This act established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and separated commercial banking from investment banking. Its impact was to provide deposit insurance, restore confidence in the banking system after the Great Depression, and maintain a separation between different types of financial activities.
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977: The Community Reinvestment Act was designed to combat discriminatory lending practices and encourage banks to invest in underserved communities. Its impact was to promote fair lending practices and increase investment in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991: FDICIA strengthened the financial stability and regulation of banks by enhancing the FDIC's authority and imposing stricter capital requirements on banks. Its impact was to improve the safety and soundness of the banking system.
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994: This act relaxed restrictions on interstate banking and branching, allowing banks to expand their operations across state lines. Its impact was to promote greater competition in the banking industry and enable banks to expand their geographic reach.
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act): This act repealed certain provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act and allowed for greater integration of financial services, including the merging of commercial and investment banks. Its impact was to reshape the financial services industry and increase the diversity of financial products offered.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010: Dodd-Frank was enacted in response to the 2008 financial crisis and aimed to enhance financial regulation, increase consumer protections, and address systemic risk. Its impact includes the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Volcker Rule, and increased oversight of financial institutions deemed "too big to fail."
Explanation: