As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.
Further Explanation:
The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.
The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.
Learn More:
1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had
2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona
Subject: History
Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court
Answer:“Remember the Alamo” became the battle cry as the Texans fought for independence.
Explanation:Just took the test on edg
b. Solomon
c. David
d. Abraham
Answer:
Cotton and tabacco plantations
Explanation:
K12
Answer:
immigration
Explanation:
Answer:
England had established herself as a modern democracy by 1850, through the Chartism movement, that achieved men's universal suffrage.
Chartism was a movement for social and political reform in Britain in the mid-19th century. The name comes from the People's Charter of 1838, which described the movement's most important objectives.
Chartism followed earlier radical movements demanding expanded voting rights, and came after the reform of 1832 was adopted, which gave voting rights to the majority of the male middle class, but not to the working class that then emerged.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Desert storm is widely known as the first Gulf war. The war happened to the response of the reaction of Hussein's invasion and occupying Kuwait. Kuwait was the main supplier of oil to the United States and other nations. The Iraqi takeover Kuwait posed an immediate threat to neighboring Saudi Arabia which was also an oil exporter. All this was seen as a threat in the oil industries which would create a crisis the world wide nation, to stop this America decided to enter the war to save Saudi Arabia and end the Dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.