What ideas associated with chivalry in today's society? Explain please

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Chivalry was the noble qualities a knight was supposed to have, such as courage and a readiness to help the weak. Remnants of chivalry that remain in society today are, good manners, consideration of any and everyone around you, kindness and showing grace and elegance in response to an act of chivalry. The virtues of chivalry offer more than pleasantries and politeness. They give purpose and meaning to male strength, and therefore support the overall workings of society.



Related Questions

What are the 7 powers given to Congress by the Constitution: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.​
Which document gave the people of Plymouth a form of self-government? A. Massachusetts Articles    B. Iroquois League    C. Godspeed Constitution    D. Mayflower Compact
Which statements accurately describe trade in the Byzantine Empire? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Justinian's law code prohibited foreigners from trading in Byzantine markets. B. Constantinople's isolated location far from trade routes hampered Byzantine trade. C. Byzantine merchants traded ivory and exotic spices from Africa and India. D. The Byzantine silk industry got its start from silkworm eggs smuggled out of China.
1.Did any events preceding the South’s secession not contribute to the decision to secede?
Why is there a Cold War between U.S and Russia

Explain how Nuremburg Trials promoted justice post World War II

Answers

The Nuremberg Trials established important principles for futureconflicts. One such principle was that individuals are accountable for their actions during the war. Many defendants used the notion that they were soldiers obeying instructions from highercommanders to justify war crimes.

How did the Nuremberg trials promote international justice?

The Nuremberg trials established that all of humanity would be guarded by an internationallegalshield and that even a Head of State would be held criminally responsible and punished for aggression and Crimes Against Humanity.

What was the purpose of the Nuremberg trials after World War II?

Held for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice, the Nurembergtrials were a series of 13 trials carriedout in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949.

Learn more about the Nuremberg trials here brainly.com/question/835785

#SPJ2

The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals, held by the Allied forces after World War II, most notable for the prosecution of prominent members of the political, military, and economic leadership of Nazi Germany. The trials were held in the city of Nuremberg, Germany. The first, and best known of these trials, described as "the greatest trial in history" by Norman Birkett, one of the British judges who presided over it, was the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal (IMT). Held between 20 November 1945 and 1 October 1946, the Tribunal was given the task of trying 23 of the most important political and military leaders of the Third Reich, though one of the defendants, Martin Bormann, was tried in absentia, while another, Robert Ley, committed suicide within a week of the trial's commencement. Not included were Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and Joseph Goebbels, all of whom had committed suicide several months before the indictment was signed. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT); among these included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges' Trial.

What was the German opinion of the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles?

Answers

the land given away needs to be returned, the reparations are hard to pay back

How are the Crusaders identified in the painting?

Answers

Usually, crusaders in paintings were depicted as white (or warm-color like) beings/soldiers who were fighting against "filthy" foreign invaders or just dark-colored-cold-colored muslim soldiers fighting for the Arab lands. 

Who wrote petitions to the British Parliament and launched a sugar boycott in their effort to abolish slavery? the Estates General Quakers suffragettes thesans-culottes

Answers

The Sugar Boycott was led by members of the Quaker faith, including important female voices such as Elizabeth Heyrick from Leicester who recognised the ways in which the sugar trade was helping to support the slave trade.

Quakers launched a sugar boycott and wrote petitions to the British Parliament in their effort to abolish slavery. This was done in 1791 after Parliament rejected the Abolition Bill. Britain's largest import was slave-grown sugar. The idea was to put economic pressure on slave-dependent industries.

Describe the routes that Homo sapiens took from the Middle East to South
America.

Answers

The routes is 5.3 according to my work

Final answer:

Homo sapiens journeyed from the Middle East to various regions of Asia and Europe, then migrated through the Bering Strait to North America, and finally, they moved south to reach South America.

Explanation:

The journeys Homo sapiens took from the Middle East to South America were lengthy and complex. From the Middle East, these early humans migrated through various routes. It is believed that Homo sapiens first migrated into other parts of Asia and Europe. They later moved to North America through a land bridge now known as the Bering Strait, around 20,000 years ago when the sea levels were low. They continued their migration south through the continent, eventually reaching South America. The exact routes and timelines are a rich area of archaeological research and debate, as new evidence sometimes modifies earlier understandings.

Learn more about Migration of Homo sapiens here:

brainly.com/question/32804268

#SPJ3

How is gridlock impacted by the the increase in partisanship in Congress?

Answers

Answer:

In politics, gridlock or deadlock or political stalemate refers to a situation when there is difficulty passing laws that satisfy the needs of the people. ... Gridlock can occur when two legislative houses, or the executive branch and the legislature are controlled by different political parties, or otherwise cannot agree.

Explanation: