The outcome of the 2000 presidential election was ultimately decided by C. the U.S. Supreme Court.
Election Dispute:
The 2000 presidential election was highly contentious and came down to the results in the state of Florida.
There were disputes over the vote count in Florida, particularly regarding "hanging chads" and other ballot irregularities.
Florida Recount:
Initially, the Florida state court ordered a recount of the votes in certain Florida counties.
This recount process was a significant part of the post-election legal battle.
Supreme Court Intervention:
The Bush campaign filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the recount process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
They sought an injunction to stop the recount.
Supreme Court Decision:
On December 12, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore.
The Court ruled that the Florida recount process was inconsistent and lacked clear standards, and therefore, it violated the Constitution.
As a result, the Supreme Court effectively halted the recount in Florida, allowing the previous certified results, which favored George W. Bush, to stand.
Outcome: With the Supreme Court's decision, George W.
Bush was declared the winner of the 2000 presidential election and became the 43rd President of the United States.
It's important to note that this election was unique in modern U.S. history due to the controversy surrounding the Florida vote count and the decisive role played by the U.S. Supreme Court in determining the outcome.
The nationwide popular vote was not the deciding factor in this election; it was the legal battle and the Supreme Court's ruling that ultimately settled the contest.
For similar question on presidential election.
#SPJ6
Answer:
Answer:
during open stamements
Explanation:
Answer: Palko’s attorney objected the retrial, claiming that it violated the Fifth Amendment that prohibited double jeopardy and stated that it applied to his case because it did apply to the states.
Explanation:
A.your chosen profession.
B.your deeds in a previous life.
C.a test you take when you are 15.
D.the caste system of your husband or wife.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A test when you are 15 and the caste system of your husband or wife. P.S. I may be right i don't get me wrong okay i'm only here to help
Explanation:
I say that because hey it make sense now think about the question and answer it okay reread it over and over to get it okay?
to suggest that Roman city builders were not skilled
B.
to honestly depict how Roman cities were built
C.
to entertain readers with invented details about Roman city building
D.
to make readers admire Roman city builders
She should hire a fence building company to put up better fences around the airport.
She should put out traps next to the runways every morning to capture the animals.
She should ask other pilots to see if they encountered flight hazards during take-off.
She should discuss options with the airport to analyze if a fence or trapping will help.
The next logical step for the pilot to make to resolve this issue is should discuss options with the airport to analyze if a fence or trapping will help. Thus the correct option is D.
Inference in any literature piece refers to achieving the conclusion of any subject with the support of facts and evidence present in the particular piece of literature.
In the given case, it is explained that A large airport's runways frequently have a lot of deer and rabbits on them every morning, as a pilot for an airline observes.
To determine whether a fence or traps will be helpful, she should explore options with the airport. The airport authority must be informed because they are more familiar with the events that occur there and can make effective decisions.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about Inference, here:
#SPJ3