Answer: option (4) charge, energy, and mass.
Justification:
1) Charge, energy, and mass are always conserved in every chemical reaction.
Charge, energy and mass are not created nor destroyed, but can be transferred.
2) The charge can only be transferred by the motion of electrons, so the charge can move and end up on a different atom, but when you add up all the charge is conserved.
The charge balance is verified in the given equation since:
left side right side
(1+) + (1-) = 1 - 1 = 0 0
∴ The total charge of the reactants equals the total charge of the products.
3) As for energy, the right side shows the "apparition" of some energy. That means that the reaction is exothermic, i.e. it releases energy.
The energy released is the net result of the difference in the potencial chemical energy of the bonds of the products and the reactants.
The reactants have more chemical energy stored than the reactants, so potential energy was transformed into heat energy.
4) As for the mass, its conservation is verified when you check that there are the same number of particles of each spieces: two particles of hydrogen in the reactand side, such as in the products; and the particles of oxygen are one in the reactants and one in the products.
b. increased soil fertilization.
c. increased use of wood products.
d. using wood from trees grown on tree farms.
Answer:
d. using wood from trees grown on tree farms.
Explanation:
Answer:
If you are performing a stoichiometry problem and the only information you have to start is the molarity and volume of a solution used, then one would multiply the molarity and volume to find moles.
Explanation:
In a stoichiometry problem, we multiply the molarity and volume to find moles, balance the chemical equation, find the mole ratio, calculate the moles of either the product formed or the reactant consumed in the reaction, and if required convert moles to grams.
b. the electric force is much greater than the strong nuclear force.
c. the strong nuclear force equals the electric force.
d. the strong nuclear force and the electric force are both attractive.
9. Uranium-238 undergoes alpha decay. Therefore, uranium-238 will
a. remain stable.
b. change into a different element altogether.
c. emit neutral particles and no energy.
d. none of the above
a. the strong nuclear force is much greater than the electric force.
b. change into a different element altogether.
Uranium-238 undergoes alpha decay. Therefore, uranium-238 will change into a different element altogether.
chemical precipitation of a solid
production of a gas
change in volume
Answer: Option (d) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A change that does not cause any difference in chemical composition of a substance are known as physical change.
For example, shape, size, mass, volume, density, etc of a substance are all physical changes.
And, a change that causes changes in chemical composition of a substance is known as chemical change.
For example, precipitation, reactivity, toxicity etc are chemical change.
Therefore, change in temperature, chemical precipitation of a solid, production of a gas are all indications of a chemical change.
Thus, we can conclude that change in volume would not necessarily indicate a chemical reaction.
Of the options provided, a change in volume would not necessarily indicate a chemical reaction. It could also be a sign of a physical change, such as a change in state.
The question is asking which of the listed factors would not necessarily indicate that a chemical reaction has taken place. From the options provided, a change in volume is not necessarily indicative of a chemical reaction. Other signs (like change in temperature, chemical precipitation of a solid, or production of a gas) are often valid signs of a chemical reaction, however, just a volume change could also be a sign of a physical change, such as a change in state from solid to liquid, or liquid to gas.
For example, when ice melts to water, or water evaporates to steam, it experiences a change in volume. This does not involve the forming or breaking of chemical bonds, thus it's not a chemical reaction, but a physical change.
#SPJ6
Answer: Aristotles
Explanation: