The debate over counting the slave population in the United States resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation. This arrangement caused an imbalance of power in favor of the slave-holding states and led to controversy around congressional reapportionment. This situation changed following the abolition of slavery, when formerly enslaved individuals were fully counted towards their state's populations.
The issue of counting the slave population arose during the birth of the United States. It was centered around the question of whether or not to count enslaved individuals as part of a state's total population for both representation and taxation purposes.
This debate resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise in the 1787 Constitution, agreeing to count enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation. This was a controversial compromise because it effectively gave additional political power to the slave-holding states.
As part of this compromise, Three-Fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's population for taxation and representation. The north and south continued to disagree on whether the 'extra' population of enslaved people should be counted, resulting in an imbalance of power in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. Despite the abolition of slavery, the effects of this arrangement persisted into the 1920s, creating controversy around the process of congressional reapportionment.
Last but not least, it's important to highlight the change in the political landscape following the abolition of slavery. Once slavery was abolished, the states that once benefited from the three-fifths counting rule now faced a challenging situation. These states had population increases with the formerly enslaved individuals being counted fully towards their respective states' total population.
#SPJ12
Answer:
someone help them please
B) Chiang Kai-shek's Communist Party defeated Mao Zedong's Nationalist Party in China.
C) Mao Zedong's Nationalist Party defeated Chiang Kai-shek's Communist Party in China.
Eliminate
D) Mao Zedong's Communist Party defeated Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Party in China.
The statement that best analyzes the revolutionary contributions of Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong is Mao Zedong's communist party defeated Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist party in China. The correct option is d.
Mao Zedong was a Chinese communist revolutionary who was the founder of the People's Republic of China (PRC), which he led as the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party from the establishment of the PRC in 1949 until he died in 1976. Ideologically a Marxist–Leninist, his theories, military strategies, and political policies are collectively known as Maoism.
Mao was the son of a prosperous peasant in Shaoshan, Hunan. He supported Chinese nationalism and had an anti-imperialist outlook early in his life, and was particularly influenced by the events of the Xinhai Revolution of 1911 and the May Fourth Movement of 1919.
Mao later adopted Marxism–Leninism while working at Peking University as a librarian and became a founding member of the Chinese Communist Party leading the Autumn Harvest Uprising in 1927.
Learn more about Mao Zedong, here:
#SPJ3