Which Of the following was a major grievance of the colonists against Great Britain?
Answers
Answer 1
Answer:
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "taxation without representation" in Parliament, since the colonists had no say over these taxes or how they were levied.
Based on this quote, how might Social Darwinists respond to the immigration restrictions of the late 1800s and early 1900s? (3 points)
Answers
A. They would have supported immigration restrictions because they considered immigrants a terrible threat to native citizens' jobs. B. They would have condemned immigration restrictions because they supported equality among people from every race and religious background. C. They would have supported immigration restrictions because they considered immigrants an inferior class and a barrier to healthy competition. D. They would have condemned immigration restrictions because they believed that every person was capable of achieving success.
The answer is C.
Which of the following cities in Mexico was captured by American troops during the war? Mexico City Veracruz Zacatecas
Answers
the city in mexico that the american troop captured during the war was : Mexico City This happen during the Mexican-American war, in which the General from the united states army named Winfield Scott managed to capture the city and raised American flag over the hall of Montezuma
the americans captured mexico city
What was the German opinion of the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles?
Answers
the land given away needs to be returned, the reparations are hard to pay back
Do you think it is important that historians learn to read Indus writing
Answers
Although it can never hurt for a historian to learn any type of language or writing system, it is not entirely crucial since there are people who specialize in Indus writing who can be consulted.
Compared with earlier presidents, modern presidents are more involved inforeign policy. economic issues. social issues. labor policy.
Answers
The correct answer iseconomic issues.
In earlier times in the United States, presidents didn't really do much about economic issues. They believed that the government should keep the market free and not get involved in any way. It was only somewhere near the end of the 19th century that the government started getting involved when progressives started introducing laws to prevent trusts and monopolies and similar things.
Compared with earlier presidents, modern presidents are more involved in "economic issues", since many previous presidents didn't the power or inclination to deal with such matters.
What was the significance of the revolutionary war for the world
Answers
That's a huge question. However, one could argue that it contributed directly to the downfall of the French monarchy and the rise of the French First Republic, with all that entailed. Three ways this could be backed are:
-The bankruptcy of the French government. Essentially, Louis spent the entire state treasury backing George Washington and fighting the British in an effort to get revenge for earlier French defeats. This had the effect of leading to massive financial and economic instability as the state became insolvent and currency became useless. The financial instability, and ensuing starvation and mass economic deprivation, led to the destabilization of power and the discrediting of the King.
-Exposure of the French to Republicanism. By this, I mean the anti-monarchist ideology rather than the modern-day GOP conservatism. Notable figures such as Count Lafayette cut their teeth on revolution in the New World, and then went back to France carrying the ideals of the Revolution with them. The midst of the financial crisis was a perfect time to deploy their experience and new ideas, which contributed to the French revolution's progress.
-The psychological impact of the British Empire's defeat was immense. The War of Independence was to England what Vietnam was to the US, except possibly worse. The idea that a rabble of upstart colonials could challenge and defeat a world empire did much to weaken the foundations of the Great Powers of Europe, and France in particular. In many ways, it fired up the spirits of the radical liberals who had been marginalized and were waiting for their chance. France, by far the most unstable of European nations, made an excellent launching-point.
In summary, the American Revolution had a massive ripple effect. Its importance in provoking the French Revolution was immense, and the latter event more than the former effectively changed politics, history, and philosophy on a profound level. At one point, some reporter asked a Chinese leader what he thought about the French Revolution. He replied that it was too early to tell. Its effects were incredible, and the Revolutionary War really set it off.