The Supreme Court case United States vs. Nixon led to limits to executive privilege.
It wasn't gaining executive privilege because Nixon was going to be impeached, but he resigned before he was removed.
He didn't get to keep the tapes private.
He didn't have a chance to lose his re-election, he resigned.
Hope this helps.
It led him to gain executive privilege limits. Because of what he had done, and was accused of being a crook
B)Most women and children were treated like servants in their homes.
C)Most women and children lacked the opportunities available to adult men.
D)most women and children were taught the basics of how to read and write.
"Most women and children lacked the opportunities available to adult men" this is the best option because it not specific of which rights the women and children have
a. Athens was destroyed by the Persians and never regained its strength.
b. The Spartan king, Leonidas, saved Greece by delaying the Persians at Thermopylae.
c. The Greeks attacked Persia because Darius captured Sparta's king.
d. The Athenian fleet defeated the Persians at Salamis.
e. Xerxes thought he could conquer Greece because the city-states would not unite.
b. The military elected new leaders
c. The emperor retained power
d. The US appointed new leaders
The correct option is: "a. Women were allowed to vote"
The 22nd election to the Japanese House of Representatives was held on April 10, 1946 and in them the lower house of the National Diet of Japan was renewed. These constituted the first elections that were celebrated in the country after the end of the Second World War. Although the elections were held under the Meiji Constitution of 1890, the US authorities made some changes in the electoral law, as was the introduction of women's suffrage, decreeing also the dissolution of the previous parliament and the holding of new elections
Women were allowed to vote.
Further Explanation:
Post World War 2, According to the new constitution of Japan, the Emperor holds the constitutional monarchy where his powers are limited and related only to the ceremonial duties. The new constitution of Japan was adopted in year 1947 and it has forty-Seven administrative divisions where Emperor is the head of the state. Cabinet has the powers to run the government. Cabinet of Japan comprises of Ministers of State and Prime minister. Prime minister is the one who directs the government in Japan. Executive branch is formed by the Prime minister and the appointment of the Prime minister is made by Emperor. General MacArthur who was foreseeing the making of new democratic government in Japan asked Japanese Diet to pass new laws related to elections and under those new laws, Women were given right to vote.
The Emperor is the head of imperial family and also acts as the ceremonial head of State. The article 6 of the constitution of Japan provides various important ceremonial roles like appointment of Prime minister as well as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He also holds the power to dissolve House of Representatives.
Learn More:
1. Why were taxes an ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists?
2. According to the law of demand, as prices decrease, demand
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Japanese Constitution
Subject: Political Science
Keywords: Japan, Constitution, Emperor, House of Representatives, Imperial Family, Prime Minister, Cabinet, Executive Branch, Article 6.
A thesis asks a question about a topic.
A thesis states a fact about an issue.
A thesis addresses both sides of an issue.
Answer:
A thesis expresses a viewpoint about a topic.
Explanation:
One thesis the beginning of an argumentative text, an affirmation whose veracity has been argued, demonstrated or justified in some way. Generally it states a scientific proposition, an axiom or a demonstrable fact.
Derived from the scientific method, a thesis is the concrete affirmation of an idea that is exposed in an open and substantiated way. It can also be called scientific theory, since a theoretical support can be considered part of established knowledge. Normally, in an argumentative text, the opinion that the writer has about the subject he / she is talking about is conformed. After that the writer defends his thesis with arguments.
Answer:
The answer my friend, is A.
This is right so hope this helps!!
Explanation:
Proof:
The Proclamation of 1763 was created by King George III and was made after the French and Indian War. Great Britain had gained territory after this war that had belonged to the French.
After Great Britain had gained new territory, they wanted to make sure the colonists knew where they stood and that they could not expand westward. This angered the colonists, as they wanted to keep expanding. They heavily objected to the Proclamation of 1763 and felt as if Great Britain should not get a say in what they do, as they themselves were the ones settling there.
While a lot of things that Great Britain did angered the colonists, this was just one of the occurrences that lead to the American Revolution.
British colonists objected to the Proclamation of 1763 because they saw it as a restriction of their freedoms and economic opportunities. This Proclamation restricted their right to settle beyond the Appalachian Mountains where they had hoped to expand for farming and economic growth. It also neglected their efforts and sacrifices during the French and Indian War.
The British colonists greatly objected to the Proclamation of 1763 due to various reasons. Primarily, the colonists viewed this proclamation, which declared the Appalachian Mountains as the western settlement boundary, as a restriction to their economic opportunities and freedom of expansion. Many colonists had already acquired land grants beyond this boundary and hence viewed the act as a tyrannical move by the Crown.
Furthermore, many colonists, especially those in the New England and southern colonies, were eager to expand to the fertile lands in the West for farming and tobacco cultivation. The Proclamation, therefore, appeared to unjustly curb their economic progression.
In addition, the colonists perceived this act as disregarding their sacrifices during the French and Indian War. Many had fought with hopes of being awarded with right to settle in lands taken from the French. Hence, the Proclamation of 1763 by the British Parliament was a disappointingly unmet expectation.
#SPJ12