Answer: Hello!
ok, here we know that 9554 divided by 562 is equal to 17; this is
9554/562 = 17
Now we have the number 95540 divided by 562, and we want to solve this using the prior information:
Is easy to see that 95540 = 10*9554, then:
95540/562 = (10*9554)/562
now we can use the commutative property of the multiplication and get:
(10*9554)/562 = 10*(9554/562) = 10*17 = 170
A number 8.984 will be rounded up to 9.
When a number is rounded off, its value is maintained but is brought closer to the next number, simplifying the number. For entire numbers as well as decimals at different places of hundreds, tens, tenths, etc., it is done.
A number can be rounded off to its lower value if the number after the decimal is between 0 and 4. The number will be rounded off to its higher value if the number after it is between 5 and 9.
The given number is 8.984 and it will be rounded up to the number 9.
The number 8.984 will be rounded up to 9.
To know more about rounding off numbers follow
#SPJ2
Saturday. How many miles did they drive on Sunday?
you add up 138+225 and you get 363 then you subtract 482-363 this is how you set it up:
4 8 2
- 3 6 3
------------
you have to borrow because 3 does not go into 2 so you change the 8 into a 7 then you 10 to 2 and you get 12 so this is what it looks like:
4 7 12
- 3 6 3
-------------------
so you then subtract 12-3=9 then 7-6=1 then 4-3=1
so this is what it looks like
4 7 12
--- 3 6 3
--------------------
1 1 9
so on Sunday they rode 119 miles
Answer:
***********o o**************
<----------(-4)--------(-2)--------(0)--------(-2)----------(4)-------------->
x>4 or x<-4
Step-by-step explanation:
You are looking for numbers that give you a distance, x, greater than 4 from 0. That wouldn't be anything between -4 and 4 because these would all give you a distance less than 4 from 0. So the answer would be to shade everything greater than 4 while also shading everything less than -4.
Here is a number line <-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-->
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
Let's think about this more which of these numbers on this number line would satisfy |x|>4?
Numbers inside the numbers -4 and 4.
Or the numbers on the outside.
Let's try the inside numbers:
-2,02
|-2|>4
2>4 is false which means -2 doesn't satisfy |x|>4
|0|>4
0>4 is false which means 0 doesn't satisfy |x|>4
|2|>4
2>4 is false which means 2 doesn't satisfy |x|>4
We could also try -4 and 4... but these will both give you a distance equal to 4 from 0. And we are looking for greater than.
|-4|>4
4>4 is false which mean -4 doesn't satisfy |x|>4
|4|>4
4>4 is false which means 4 doesn't satisfy |x|>4
Now let's try the numbers on the outside:
-6,6,8
|-6|>4
6>4 is true so -6 does satisfy |x|>4
|6|>4
6>4 is true so 6 does satisfy |x|>4
|8|>4
8>4 is true so 8 does satisfy |x|>4
So what I'm trying to do is convince you more that the only numbers that would satisfy |x|>4 are numbers outside the interval from -4 to 4.
So x>4 or x<-4.
On a number line the solution would look like this:
***********o o**************
<----------(-4)--------(-2)--------(0)--------(-2)----------(4)-------------->
We have holes at -4 and 4 to mean we do not include those numbers. We would have if the inequality read . The line underneath this inequality means to include or equals. We do not want to include; we did not have the equal sign. The only difference between the two solutions would be to fill the holes if you .
***********o o**************
<----------(-4)--------(-2)--------(0)--------(-2)----------(4)-------------->
Answer:
It would be 5
Step-by-step explanation:
SO the additive inverse would basically just be the opposite of the number, for example lets say you had 12, the additive inverse would be -12. You're just changing the sign of the number! From what i know i believe that's it. Have a nice day! :D