Their methods converged on the fact that both movements held riots. Since they wanted reduce the middle men power once the conditions were unfair, they held protest and raised unions to accomplish what they wanted. Railroad companies used government grants and subsides to build but charged uneven rates, which were only beneficial for big manufacturers.
This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that yes, there are absolute standards for truth and justice, since we as humans have developed ways of understanding right and wrong.
Explanation:
Socrates believed that real achievement extended only with the Gods and that the best we can do is support their example as best as likely within our human deprivation. The absolute standards to which you apply would, accordingly, be known only to them and would not be available by us, which was what made the regular examination of one's life and actions for potential error crucial. To believe that humans could be as accurate as gods by the effort of will would have been deemed the final hubris. So yes, I accept such measures exist, but I also believe that they are behind our knowledge to succeed.
B. It established a public record of consistent laws
C. It is the world's first "declaration of independence."
D. It provided a history of the king's rulings
The correct answer is B. It established a public record of consistent laws.
This was a set of written laws that all members of the Babylonian society were supposed to follow. These laws, develop around the 1750 BC helped to create a society in which there were consistent punishments for crimes. The idea of an "eye for an eye" or a "tooth for a tooth" was a common phrase used to explain Hammurabi's code.
Essentially, for every crime there is an equal punishment that fits the crime. For example, if someone steals food from another person, than they can expect to have food taken from them.