Political systems, family patterns, and work practices are examples of non-material culture. Therefore, option A is correct.
Material culture: It refers to the resources or physical objects that are used by people and it defines their culture. Some examples of material culture are books, homes, temples, stores, factories, ornaments, buildings, utensils, clothing, and all objects which are produced or used by humans.
Non-material culture: It consists of nonphysical ideas about our own culture. Some examples of non-material culture are rules, values, beliefs, thoughts, political systems, morals, family patterns, work practices, worship, religion, laws, punishment, business, etiquette, etc. The four components of nonmaterial culture are symbols, norms, values, and language.
Thus, option A, books is correct.
Learn more about culture, here:
#SPJ6
Books are examples of material culture, whereas political systems, family patterns, and work practices are examples of nonmaterial culture.
The question concerns the concept of nonmaterial culture, which includes the elements of a society that represent its values, beliefs, norms, language, and practices. These are intangible aspects of culture, in contrast to material culture, which consists of physical objects and artifacts created and used by people within a society. Now, to address the question directly:
The examples of nonmaterial culture except for one are c. political systems, b. family patterns, and d. work practices. These are all components of nonmaterial culture because they represent the values, beliefs, and norms of a society. On the other hand, a. books are examples of material culture because they are physical objects. While books can convey aspects of nonmaterial culture (like ideas and knowledge), the books themselves are tangible items, and thus they fall under the category of material culture.
Example:
A school building represents material culture, whereas the educational methods and standards within are part of nonmaterial culture.
Answer:
C. ignoring stress signals
b. False
Answer:false
Explanation:
false
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Alcohol is a psychoactive substance with a large and varied number of effects on the body and therefore its combination with driving can be fatal. As a central nervous system depressant, alcohol acts on several organs. In the first doses it is a stimulant and generates the sensation of excitement. However, inhibitions and judgment are affected. For this reason, we can say that alcohol does not restrict impulsive behavior, but stimulates it.
As consumption increases, motor skills and reaction time will also suffer. In high doses, it may cause drowsiness or even fainting.
Alcohol consumption affects brain functions gradually. Starting with emotions (mood swings) to the ability to concentrate and reason. Drunk individuals have a higher risk of getting involved in a traffic collision. The physiological changes caused by the substance increase the likelihood of accidents occurring, both for drivers (motorcycle, car or bicycle) and pedestrians.
Yes, it is true that alcohol weakens a driver's inhibitions, leading to impulsive and potentially hazardous decisions while driving. This is caused by alcohol's effect on the brain's prefrontal cortex.
The statement in question, 'Alcohol weakens a driver's inhibitions, which are the inner forces of one's personality that hold back or restrain one's impulsive behavior,' is true. Alcohol is known to lower inhibitions, leading to a likelihood of impulsive, risky decisions being made. This is particularly dangerous in the context of driving, as it can result in reckless behavior such as speeding, running red lights, or failing to wear a seatbelt. The decrease in inhibitions occurs due to the effect alcohol has on the brain's prefrontal cortex, the area responsible for decision-making and controlling social behavior.
#SPJ6