The term “radiation” refers to hot materials inside the Earth rising towards Earth’s surface, cooling, and sinking back down.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: No, that's not a true statement. The process you've detailed
is a perfect description of "convection", not radiation.

Related Questions

. A ray of monochromatic light (f = 5.09 × 1014hertz) in air is incident at an angle of 30.°on a boundary with corn oil. What is the angle of refraction, to the nearest degree, for thislight ray in the corn oil?
The usual units of density are:
2. What happens when multiple forces act on an object?A. The object will always move. B. The object will move if the forces are balanced. C. The object will move if the forces are unbalanced. D. The object will always stay in place. 3. An object moves in the direction of the __________ force. A. net B. balanced C. strongest D. weakest
The velocity of a car changes from 20 m/s east to 5 m/s east in 5 seconds. What is the acceleration of the car?
An object is in uniform circular motion, tracing an angel at 30 degrees every 0.010 seconds. What's the period of this motion and how do I work it out?

Which of the following distances is the longest?a. 0.006 kilometersb. 0.3 decimeters

c. 820 meters

d. 20,000 millimeters

Answers

820 meters is the longest

Explain at least two differences between justice system laws and scientific laws.

Answers

The adversarial system is rigid – the roles are proscribed – the prosecutor wants to convict, the defendant wants a decision of not guilty. They are not just allowed but expected to bias their presentation, trusting the truth to come out between the adversaries. Science certainly has its sides of partisanship and bias. But these sides are self-imposed and can be abandoned at any time. While a prosecutor should not lie or hide evidence, and should drop a case if they become convinced the defendant is innocent, they wake up in the morning with no choice about which side of the argument they will come down on. In the criminal justice system the advocates are rigidly fixed in their roles and the jurors are rigidly neutral (the process to find a random neutral jury took as long as the trial itself). In science, the advocates are the same people as the jurors. And as a result they have to be willing to be flexible and change their minds. A good scientist shouldn’t have a pre-determined rigid answer to a question.
Lack of investigation – we jurors were told over and over not to investigate the situation ourselves. We were to make our decision only on the basis of the evidence presented to us. I can tell you in the case I was on there were at least two whopping big questions hanging over the case that nearly every juror in the room identified as very important but not addressed by either lawyer. Either one of them (whether the defendant’s schedule allowed time to drink before being stopped in the car, whether a particular medical condition could affect breathalyzer tests) could have changed the outcome. We could have answered one of these with 10 minutes on google and the other with some very simple subpoena of records. But we couldn’t use any of this. Scientists obviously are the opposite – if they need more information, they are expected to go get it before making an opinion.
Reliance on personal testimony – although science and trials share a focus on evidence, trials recognize testimony of individual people under oath as a major form of evidence. They certainly acknowledge the possibility of lying and explicitly instruct jurors to decide what testimony they believe. My case was unusual in that there was so much video footage, but still a majority of the case came down to testimony by the police officers, and most cases even a few years ago would have had only testimony. Science on the other hand, doesn’t accept testimony. Or does it? What else is the methods and results section of a paper? I’m on the fence whether science is so different on this one.

How much force is needed to accelerate a 1000-kg car at a rate of 3 m/s2

Answers

In the given question we already know the mass of the car. The mass of the car is 1000 kg. The acceleration at which the car needs to reach is 3 m/s^2. Based on these information's, the required answer can be easily deduced. We already know that
Force = Mass * Acceleration
= (1000 * 3) newton
= 3000 newton
So the amount of force that is required to move give the car an acceleration of 3m/s^2 is 3000 Newton.

An object with mass 60 kg moved in outer space. When it was at location < 13, -19, -3 > its speed was 3.5 m/s. A single constant force < 220, 320, -120 > N acted on the object while the object moved from location < 13, -19, -3 > m to location < 18, -11, -8 > m. Then a different single constant force < 150, 230, 220 > N acted on the object while the object moved from location < 18, -11, -8 > m to location < 22, -17, -3 > m. What is the speed of the object at this final location?final speed = m/s

Answers

The speed of the object at its' final location is; 38 m/s

What is work energy theorem?

For the first force, we are given;

Force; F₁ = 220i + 320j - 120k

Initial Position; r₁ = 13i - 19j - 3k

Final Position; r₂ = 18i - 11j - 8k

Thus; Displacement; Δr = r₂ - r₁

Δr = 18i - 11j - 8k - (13i - 19j - 3k)

Δr = 5i + 8j - 5k

From work energy theorem, we know that;

F₁ * Δr = ¹/₂m(v₂² - v₁²)

We are given v₁ = 2.5 m/s and m = 60 kg. Thus;

(220i + 320j - 120k) × (5i + 8j - 5k) = ¹/₂ * 60(v₂² - 3.5²)

4260/30 = v₂² - 3.5²

1420 = v₂² - 12.25

Solving gives v₂ = 37.85 m/s

For the second force, we are given;

Force; F₂ = 150i + 230j - 220k

Initial Position; r₁ = 18i - 11j - 8k

Final Position; r₂ = 22i - 17j - 3k

Thus; Displacement; Δr = r₂ - r₁

Δr = 22i - 17j - 3k - (18i - 11j - 8k)

Δr = 4i - 6j + 5k

From work energy theorem, we know that;

F₂ * Δr = ¹/₂m(v₂² - v₁²)

Now, v₁ = 37.85 m/s and m = 60 kg. Thus;

(150i + 230j + 220k) × (4i - 6j + 5k) = ¹/₂ * 60(v₂² - 37.85²)

320/30 = v₂² - 37.85²

10.67 = v₂² - 1,432.6225

Solving gives v₂ = 38 m/s

Read more about Work Energy theorem at; brainly.com/question/14468674

Sigma F.dS = total work done = change in kinetic energy
(220, 320, -120).(18-13,-11+19,-8+3) +(150, 230, 220).(22-18,-17+11,-3+8)= 1/2 *60*(V^2- 3.5^2)

220*5+320*8+ -120*-5 + 150*4 + 230* 6 +220* -5= ..
simplify his

Which of the following stars would be the most luminous?2. Yellow star
3. Red star
4. Blue star
5. Orange star

Answers

The correct answer to the question that is stated above is the fourth option which is :Blue star.
Blue stars are uncommon but very bright. It has an average luminosity of 1,400,000 ( the Sun =1) with a strong UV continuum. The blue stars average mass is 60 ( the Sun =1) and its average radius is 15 ( the Sun =1).

Answer: Blue star.

Explanation:

An object is thrown downward with an initial velocity of 3 feet per second. The relationship between the distance s it travels and time t is given by s = 3t + 16t2. How long does it take the object to fall 70 feet?