Answer: C They work both to restrict and to outlaw abortions.
Explanation:
Abortion opponents today focus on the rights of the unborn and endeavor to restrict or outlaw abortion through state legislation. They have been particularly successful in conservative states, where there is a marked increase in laws limiting abortion access or imposing outright bans with punitive measures. Their alignment with the Republican Party often brings expectations of reversing Roe v. Wade, though some are dissatisfied with the party's progress on this issue.
Today, the focus of abortion opponents largely emphasizes the protection of the rights of the unborn, which they believe are equal to the rights of the mother. To further their cause, they have historically targeted national legislation but have now turned their efforts successfully to state legislatures. After the shift in strategy, there has been a significant increase in the number of states implementing laws that place restrictions on abortions, requiring parental involvement in a minor's decision, allowing health-care providers to refuse performing abortions, and prohibiting the use of public funds for abortions.
Anti-abortion advocates describe the fetus as an unborn child and argue that personhood rights begin at conception. Moreover, these opponents have been staunch supporters of Republican governance, hoping for the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Their backing of Republican candidates comes with the expectation of legislative action to restrict or ban abortion, although some feel the party has not moved effectively enough on this front.
Consequently, many state laws have been enacted, especially in conservative regions, that maintain the legality of abortion but limit access to abortion services, which significantly affects poor women's ability to obtain safe and legal abortions. Also, very conservative states have moved to outright bans on abortion, with some establishing criminal penalties for those who undergo the procedure, undercutting a woman's right to choose and affecting her life prospects and citizenship rights such as voting.
#SPJ3
B. Tang
C. Song
D. All of the above
*On China*
B. Housing prices shot up, and soon the middle class could not afford to live there.
C. Women, who weren’t working 9 to 5, became important players in town politics.
D. Light rail train systems sprang up to transport people between city and suburb.
E. Automobiles became more expensive because demand was very high.
"A-Whites moved out of the cities, taking their wealth with them"
for plato.
hope that helps.
b. movies
c. computers
d. comic books
Answer: All the members of the single house are elected by the people.
Context/detail:
The Articles of Confederation, which preceded the creating of the Constitution of the United States, employed a unicameral (single house) legislature. In the end, the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 decided to go with a bicameral (two-house) legislature as a compromise between small states vs. large states in regard to representation. "The Great Compromise," as it became known, resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators. In the original US Constitution, each state's senators were selected by that state's legislature, not directly elected by the people. The 17th Amendment changed that, so that now US Senators are also directly elected by the people. But we retain the two-house legislature as a way of balancing power between states with high populations and those with lower populations.
Answer:
civil rights
Explanation:
Robinson 's character, his usage non - violent resistance, as well as his indisputable talent, rejected the conventional justification of apartheid that then labelled several other aspects of people's lives. It changed american culture and made a significant contribution to that same civil rights era.
El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, commonly known here as Malcolm X, had been an American Muslim minister and human rights lawyer who was a respected person throughout the civil rights struggle. He is mainly remembered for his steadfast and problematic black racial activism, and for his hours wasted as an outspoken spokesperson for the Islamic Nation.
Rosa Louise McCauley Parks had been an American civil rights activist best known for her pivotal role in the bus boycott. The u.s. congress named her the "first lady of civil rights" and the "mother of free movement."
Answer:
Pope Urban made a very public and urgent plea in 1095 to all of Christendom after receiving a letter from the Byzantine Emperor Alexis describing the increasing danger from the Seljuk Turks, Tartars from Asia, who had already conquered the caliphate of Baghdad in 1055 and now were seeking to expand their empire into the Holy Land. All of the history you have heard about the Crusades is so much hogwash:
from Seven Lies About Catholic History, by Diane Moczar
Unprovoked Muslim aggression in the seventh century brought large parts of the southern Byzantine Empire, including Syria, the Holy Land, and Egypt under Arab rule. Christians who survived the conquests found themselves subject to a special poll tax and discriminated against as an inferior class known as dhimmi. Often their churches were destroyed and other harsh conditions imposed. For centuries their complaints had been reaching Rome, but Europe was having its own Dark Age of massive invasion, and nothing could be done to relieve the plight of eastern Christians.
By the eleventh century, under the rule of a new Muslim dynasty, conditions worsened. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, site of the Crucifixion was destroyed, along with a large number of other churches, and Christian pilgrims were massacred. In 1067 a group of seven thousand peaceful German pilgrims lost two-thirds of their number to Muslim assaults. By this time the popes, including St. Gregory VII, were actively trying to rally support for relief of eastern Christians, though without success. It was not until the very end of the century, in 1095, that Pope Urban's address at Clermont in France met with a response-though not quite the one he had hoped for. But the response was what we now call the First Crusade.
"The general consensus of opinion among medievalists . . . is tha thte Crusades were military expeditions organized by the peoples of Western Christendom, notably the Normans and the French, under the leadership of the Roman Popes, for the recover of the Holy Places from their Muslim masters." This seems to sum up most neatly what the Crusades really were and how their participants actually viewed them. The Crusades were not colonialist or commercial ventures, they were not intended to force Christianity on Jews and Muslims, and they were not the projects of individual warlords. Their primary goal, in addition to the defense of the Eastern Empire, was the recovery of the Holy Land for Christendom, and they acknowledged the leadership of the Popes. As French historian Louis Brehier wrote, 'the popes alone understood the menace of Islam's progress for christian civilization.'"
Explanation: