Answer:
1.8 MJ
Explanation:
PE = mgh
PE = (1500 kg) (3.7 N/kg) (324 m)
PE = 1,798,200 J
PE = 1.8 MJ
c. drawing
b. sketching
d. acting
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Right on edge2020
The Tiger has a mass of 34 Kg and runs with a speed of 8.5 m/s, the Connecticut Energy of the tiger 289 Kg m/s.
The momentum of an object is defined as the product of mass and velocity of the object.
Mathematically, the momentum of an object is given as;
P = mv
where;
m is the mass of the object
v is the velocity of the object
The principle of conservation of linear momentum states that the total momentum of an isolated system is always conserved.
That is the sum of initial momentum of the system is equal to the sum of the final momentum of the system.
Mass of tiger , m = 34 kg .
Velocity of tiger , v = 8.5 m/s .
Substituting the above values in given formula,
P = mv
= 34 × 8.5
= 289 Kg m/s.
The Connecticut Energy of the tiger 289 Kg m/s.
Learn more about Momentum,
#SPJ2
Answer:
The kinetic energy of the tiger is 1228.25 J.
Explanation:
KE=1/2m*v^2
m=34
v=8.5
KE=1/2*34*8.5^2
KE=17*72.25
KE=1228.25 J
Answer:
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is the integral of the product of the squared distance by the mass differential. Is the mass equivalent in the rotational motion
a) True. When the moment of inertia is increased, more force is needed to reach acceleration, so it is more difficult to change the angular velocity that depends proportionally on the acceleration
b) True. The moment of inertia is part of the kinetic energy, which is composed of a linear and an angular part. Therefore, when applying the energy conservation theorem, the potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy, the rotational part increases with the moment of inertia, so there is less energy left for the linear part and consequently it falls slower
c) True. The moment of inertial proportional to the angular acceleration, when the acceleration decreases as well. Therefore, a smaller force can achieve the value of acceleration and the change in angular velocity. Consequently, less force is needed is easier
d. The lower the moment of inertia, the slower something will roll down an incline - this is the option that is NOT true. Objects with lower moments of inertia roll down inclines faster, not slower because they resist changes to their rotation less.
The correct statement that is NOT true among the provided options is: d.
The correct statement that is NOT true among the provided options is: d. The lower the moment of inertia, the slower something will roll down an incline.
The moment of inertia, often denoted by 'I', is essentially the rotational equivalent of mass for linear motion. It is a property of a body that measures its resistance to angular acceleration, which is its change in angular velocity.
However, the claim in statement d is not correct as per the principles of rotational motion in physics. An object with a lower moment of inertia would actually roll down an incline faster, not slower, given the same amount of gravitational potential energy, since it has less resistance to changes in its rotational motion.
#SPJ3