The difference between a reaction and an opinion is that one is about individual's expressions and the other one is about individual's own viewpoint.
An opinion is someone's personal thoughts and feelings about something that is not based on facts. For example, one person may love a particular game while another does not, resulting in opposing viewpoints.
A reaction is defined as a person displaying and expressing their emotions in response to a situation or event.
Thus, this is the difference between a reaction and an opinion.
For more details regarding opinion, visit:
#SPJ2
equally: to an equal or uniform degree
respectfully: marked by or showing respect or deference
rationally: having reason or understanding
Drama is a specific literary genre that includes dialogue and a performance as part of his compositional body. This kind of text could be presented in verse or prose and it is usually thought to be performed in scenery. Also a drama, as other narrations, use to have an introduction, a conflictive moment and finally an end. The person who writes drama is called playwright or dramatist.
Through times, it has been many different types of dramatic compositions, among them we can find, for example:
These three examples are analysed by Aristotle in his book: the poetic (IV Century B.C), where he reflex about the aesthetic features of each kind of composition. The part about comedy is missed, so we only have his notes about tragedy and epic dramatizations.
Like other human being expressions, the way that the authors think a dramatic play obeys to the contextual situation; that is: how is the cultural environment thinking and, in general, living. That is why it could be harder for an actual reader (or spectator) to understand the terms, actions and beliefs of a really old play; nevertheless, we can learn many things about the past only by consulting literature (which includes dramatic texts). Of course we can feel us closer than younger representations and this is because we share more stuff with those people who lived in the times when the piece was made, but although it does affect how I understand and enjoy determinate play, I’m convinced of we can research and learn about historic process and changes to enjoy every kind of theatrical expressions.
Specifically, when we talk about how does the era affect our ability as spectators to enjoy or understand a play, we have to consider the fact that all the plays that have been made until now had some historical, social and ideological signs that we can find if we analyze them carefully. At this respect, there are many things that we cannot understand, between this kind of stuff we can find: popular lexicon, references to places, people or events that possibly marked the society and etcetera. Nevertheless, we can enjoy and understand them from the distance if we consider that they, over time, become a testimony of how life was at that moment. This means that yes, it changes the spectators' ability and way to enjoy a theatric piece, but the written era doesn’t impede the possibility of enjoying or understand it.
The differences are sometimes obvious, for example when we think in language (the kind of words and speech’s structures used), costumes or places, but it exists other aspects from societies that we cannot identify as easy as the other ones; at this respect there is the ideology (which is the way of thinking that a specific society has) who in fact influences many other human being areas: for example what is considered as good or bad, what is thinking as a mysterious or divine entities, what is seen as a relevant and important theme, etcetera. Thus, the way as we feel identified with the more recent plays (for example the Shakespeare’s ones) cannot be compared with that pieces that have millennials of age because we have change cultural and physically, hindering us the ability of feel and put ourselves in the other scenery.
KEY WORDS: Drama, culture situation, time
After the alligator appeared on Wyatt, he appeared on TV wearing holey boxer shorts, as shown in option C.
This moment of the story is used to generate humor in a tense and dangerous situation, where the author alleviates the situation and makes the mood more comfortable for the reader.
This question is about "The Worst Class Trip Ever."
More information about the mood of a text in the link:
The poem suggests about the speaker's walks through the orchard was, It proves that the speaker is no longer interested in exploring orchards. It conveys the speaker's feelings regarding the inviting hues of the orchards.
A grouping of words, whether spoken or written: Traditionally a rhythmical writing with occasional rhymes that expresses feelings, thoughts, or experiences in a way that is more focused, creative, and potent than regular speech or prose: Some poems use the meter, while others use free verse.
As The poem suggests speaker was walking through, The orchard because he was no longer interested in the poem as shown in the According to the line 7-9. As speaker's feelings regarding the inviting hues of the orchards.
Therefore, The speaker walks through the orchard, Because no longer interested in exploring orchards.
Learn more about the poem here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
Explanation:
The whole poem