Explaining the pro-slavery and abolitionist arguments of the antebellum period.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: During the antebellum period in the United States, there were significant debates and arguments surrounding the institution of slavery. Two major perspectives emerged: pro-slavery arguments in support of slavery and abolitionist arguments opposing it.

Pro-Slavery Arguments:

1. Economic Necessity: Proponents of slavery argued that the Southern economy was heavily dependent on agriculture, particularly large-scale cotton cultivation. They believed that slave labor was essential for the profitability of these plantations and that without it, the South's economy would suffer.

2. Racial Superiority: Many pro-slavery advocates promoted the idea of racial superiority, arguing that African Americans were inherently inferior to whites. They used pseudoscience and biased interpretations of religious texts to justify the enslavement of African Americans as a way to "civilize" them.

3. Social Order: Some argued that slavery was necessary to maintain social order in the South. They believed that without slavery, there would be chaos and upheaval as freed slaves could pose a threat to white society.

4. Property Rights: Pro-slavery advocates viewed enslaved people as property, and they argued that property rights were sacrosanct. They believed that the government should protect the rights of slaveowners to their "property."

Abolitionist Arguments:

1. Morality and Human Rights: Abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong and a violation of basic human rights. They believed that every individual had the inherent right to freedom and that enslaving other human beings was a grave injustice.

2. Religious and Ethical Appeals: Many abolitionists cited religious and ethical principles in their arguments against slavery. They contended that slavery went against Christian values of equality and compassion and that it was incompatible with a just society.

3. Economic Critique: Some abolitionists argued that slavery was economically inefficient and that free labor would be more productive in the long run. They believed that the South's reliance on slavery hindered economic development.

4. Political and Legal Arguments: Abolitionists worked to change laws and policies to end slavery. They argued for legislative action to prohibit the expansion of slavery into new territories and states, which eventually led to the Civil War.

It's important to note that these arguments were part of a complex and deeply divisive national debate that ultimately culminated in the American Civil War. Abolitionist sentiments grew stronger over time, leading to the eventual emancipation of enslaved people and the end of slavery in the United States with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1865.

Answer 2

Answer:

Final answer:

In the antebellum period, the pro-slavery argument suggested that slavery was economically beneficial and culturally justified, while the abolitionist argument maintained that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often referenced American democratic principles to insist that all individuals should be equal, irrespective of race.

Explanation:

The antebellum period was a time of intense debate over slavery in the United States. On one side, the pro-slavery arguments asserted that slavery was economically beneficial, a social good, and even justified by religion. It was presumed as necessary for the Southern agricultural economy, especially for labour-intensive crops such as tobacco and cotton.

On the contrary, the abolitionist arguments promoted the view that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often pointed to the Declaration of Independence's statement, 'all men are created equal', and insisted that these principles should apply to all individuals, regardless of race. Many abolitionists, like Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth, were former slaves who spoke out about the brutal realities of slavery.

Learn more about antebellum period here:

brainly.com/question/34232134

#SPJ11

Related Questions

How did the League of Nations respond when Japan invaded Manchuria?
What was the conflict between the Church and the Spanish government?
How did the federal government try to protect the rights of blacks during congressional Reconstruction? a. It supported the Ku Klux Klan and other southern groups. b. It sent soldiers south to ensure blacks could exercise their rights. c. It forced southern legislatures to appoint Redeemer Democrats. d. It instituted black codes and Jim Crow laws in all southern states.
Three benefits of the plow are____
Which of these was the basic idea of the New Deal? the Supreme Court is responsible to the executive branchb. Energy production should be solely the concern of private enterprise c. States’ rights have priority over rights of the federal government Eliminate d. the federal government has a major responsibility for ensuring economic prosperity

Which of the following threats did soldiers face in the trenches? fire starvation collapse disease

Answers

Although soldiers faced numerous threats in the trenches during World War I, the best option from the list would be "disease" since wound exposure was a major issue.

In the 1920s, what did businesses and industries do that caused the economy to slow down?

Answers

Answer:

Just took the quiz the answer is D. They overproduced goods.

Explanation:

in the late 1920's kept the stock market artificially high, but eventually led to large market crashes.

What impact did washing machines have

Answers

Doing laundry took enormous amounts of time and energy, water often had to be pumped or drawn from a well, carried in, heated, clothes scrubbed, rinsed, and wrung out by hand.

Answer:

woman get more lazyyyyyyyyyyy

Eroded soil can enter ______, causing them to fill up with sediment.

Answers

Eroded soil can enter reservoirs, causing them to fill up with sediment. This can result in a dangerous situation, as the drinking water supply can then be contaminated by the impurities within the soil itself. When the water supply is low from other sources, the reservoir water laced with soil and sediment will then enter the drinking supply.

Answer:

Eroded soil can enter STREAMS , causing to fill up with sediment.

Which of the following countries was a member of the Allied Powers?Austria-Hungary

Great Britain

Sweden

Answers

During both WWl and WWll, Great Britain was a member of the Allied Powers.

In both World Wars, Great Britain and France made up the main European powers of the allies. Germany was on the other side in both wars (with the Axis Powers). Sweden was consistently neutral/not a big player in the wars (although it was invaded in ww2, it tried to stay neutral). Hope this was helpful!

What was a result of the bisbee deportation?

Answers

A presidential commission found it illegal.

~Hope this helped~

Other Questions

Based on your knowledge of Oklahoma and US history, was establishing Fort Gibson and Fort Towson a good idea for the United States and for the Indian Territory? Why or why not? Think about the context of what was going on at the time, as well as anticipating future events in US history. You might need to do some short, additional research on the Internet to help you answer this question fully. Your answer should be 75–100 words and should include your reasoning to justify your argument.

Why did the British surrender at the revolutionary war in Yorktown?

What was the most likely result of the voting rights act of 1965?

Which two revolutions inspired Latin American countries to declare their independence from Spain?The Chinese Revolution The American Revolution The African Revolution The French Revolution