Establishing Fort Gibson and Fort Towson in the Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) was a complex decision with mixed consequences.
At the time (early 19th century), the forts were intended to control Native American tribes, facilitate trade, and protect settlers moving westward. However, these forts also played a role in the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, as seen in the Trail of Tears. While they provided some security and infrastructure, their establishment was part of a larger policy that led to significant suffering for Native populations, making it a questionable move for both the United States and the Indian Territory.While the forts might have provided immediate benefits such as protection and trade facilitation, their existence was intertwined with a larger policy that resulted in profound human rights violations and long-lasting trauma for Native populations. In hindsight, the establishment of these forts can be seen as part of a broader strategy that prioritized the expansion of American territory and control over indigenous peoples, at the expense of their well-being and sovereignty. Therefore, whether the establishment of Fort Gibson and Fort Towson was a good idea depends on whether one views the short-term benefits of security and trade as outweighing the long-term consequences of displacement and suffering inflicted upon the Native American communities in the region.
To know more about Territory:
#SPJ3
Answer:
The establishment of Fort Gibson and Fort Towson benefited the United States. For example, the US government established Fort Gibson to maintain peace between the Osage and the Cherokee tribes. Peace between these tribes was a good idea since the United States had plans to move even more Native Americans to this area in the future. And once those relocations started, following the passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830, the forts protected Native American tribes that the government moved to Indian Territory. The government built roads and provided provisions to the people who immigrated there. Fort Towson served to protect the southern border of the United States, and it was also a stop for settlers who were heading into Texas. Both forts helped the area stay safe and stable.
Explanation:
bec its the answer
B) bay of pigs
C) battle of stalingrad
D) none of the above
b. False
A war between citizens of the same country that takes place within the country is indeed known to be civil war. The usual objective of one side is to be able to take control of the country or a particular region in the state.
This statement is true. A civil war, also known as the interstate war, is a war between organized groups within the state or country. These are usually groups that follow different political, religious, economic ideas, where one of the groups through the civil war wants to take control of the entire state and thus change the policy of the government. Such a war is a conflict of high intensity in which there are no specific strategic rules, or rules at all, and can cause great human casualties.
The U.S. Coast Guard and Army combined to establish firm border security.
Congress passed five neutrality laws in order to stay out of any conflicts.
The United States failed to pay its dues to the League of Nations.
Answer:
'Congress passed five neutrality laws in order to stay out of any conflicts
Explanation:
THAT IS THE ANSWER JUST TOOK THE FINAL TEST
Answer:
alexandria should be your answer :)
Explanation:
have a nice day :)