Step-by-step explanation:
Weight of the puppy at 4 weeks old:
pounds = pounds
This weight is 3/5th times of the weight of puppy in 16 weeks. Let's assume the weight of puppy in 16 weeks be x. Then, 3/5th of x is 45/4 pounds.
Inequationform,
Multiplying 5/3 both sides to isolate x on LHS,
pounds
The equation used for finding the weight of puppy is 3x/5 = 45/4. And Jayden's puppy weighed 18.75 pounds in 16 weeks.
For the function f defined by f(x) = 2x^2 – 3x, evaluate: f(x+3)
Answer:
2x² + 9x + 9
Step-by-step explanation:
To evaluate f(x + 3) substitute x = x + 3 into f(x), that is
f(x + 3) = 2(x + 3)² - 3(x + 3) ← expand (x + 3)² using FOIL
= 2(x² + 6x + 9) - 3(x + 3) ← distribute both parenthesis
= 2x² + 12x + 18 - 3x - 9 ← collect like terms
= 2x² + 9x + 9
Answer:
0.9533
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Probability that a randomly selected woman's height is less than 65 inches:
Using the z-score formula:
�
=
�
−
�
�
Z=
σ
X−μ
Where:
�
X = 65 inches
�
μ = 64.3 inches
�
σ = 2.7 inches
�
=
65
−
64.3
2.7
≈
0.2593
Z=
2.7
65−64.3
≈0.2593
Now, find the probability associated with this z-score, which is approximately 0.6010 (rounded to four decimal places).
(b) Probability that the mean height of 43 randomly selected women is less than 65 inches:
Using the Central Limit Theorem:
�
μ (mean of the sample means) remains 64.3 inches.
�
sample mean
σ
sample mean
(standard deviation of the sample means) is calculated as
2.7
43
≈
0.4115
43
2.7
≈0.4115.
Now, find the z-score for a sample mean of 65 inches:
�
=
65
−
64.3
0.4115
≈
1.6924
Z=
0.4115
65−64.3
≈1.6924
The probability associated with this z-score is approximately 0.9533 (rounded to four decimal places).
Answer: The manager is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation: 500,000 nails/500 nails = 1,000 nails. If a survery of 500 nails finds 4 misshapen ones, we must multiply 4 by 1,000 because multiplying 500 by 1,000 gives us 500,000. 4x1,000+4,000. 4,000 does not equal 1,500, so the manager is incorrect.
Factor by grouping: 6x2 + 3x + 20x + 10.
This is a polynomial written with four terms that don't have a single common factor among them. However, the first two terms have a common factor (3x), and the last two terms have a common factor (10). This situation doesn't answer all of our wildest factoring dreams, but we'll take it.
By pulling out the common factors for each pair of terms, we can rewrite the original polynomial like this:
3x(2x + 1) + 10(2x + 1)
These two terms now have a common factor of (2x + 1). Seems like we should be able to do something with that information, don't you think? In fact, we can pull out this common factor and rewrite the polynomial again:
(3x + 10)(2x + 1)
The value of WZ in the given similar polygons, is 72
When polygons are similar their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional.
Given that, quadrilateral ABCD and quadrilateral WXYZ are similar,
The order of the proportionality statement tells us which angles and sides are corresponding.
To solve, set up a proportion.
AD/WZ = DC/ZY
12/WZ = 6/36
Cross multiply.
6(WZ) = 12x36
6(WZ) = 432
Divide both sides by 6
WZ = 72
Hence, the value of WZ is 72
Learn more about similar polygons click;
#SPJ2
Answer: C. 72
Step-by-step explanation: